Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is evolutions primary mechanism mutation ?
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 80 of 141 (266767)
12-08-2005 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by Carico
12-08-2005 9:30 AM


Why do I bother....
Carico writes:
Not only that, but evolutionists are asking us to believe that this perfect random mutation happened over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over again to develop the cognition, bi-pedal qualities, the ability to form concepts and analyses and the ability to rule over the animals that the human being posseses. This then makes the odds of evolution so astronimoical as to be impossible.
Not perfect mutation, random mutation. The "perfection", if that's what you want to call it, comes from natural selection.
Creationists ALWAYS neglect to consider natural selection.
Evolutionists are also asking us to believe the an ape and a "common ancestor" mated to produce a mutant who then found another mutant with the exact same mutation and they bred an offspring who found another mutant who then bred offspring with another mutant whose genes had added another superior trait by accident, and they found another mutant to breed with who also had another superior gene added to his DNA and on and on. This is not only astronomical, but completely bizarre as well.
Evolutionists are not asking you to believe such a caricature.
And all of this to deny that God exists!
For your information, there are a lot of evolutionists who believe in God.
You have a completely misguided idea of what evolution is all about. It has been explained to you many times now, but you simply won't listen.
Could you tell me why I should go on talking to you?
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 08-Dec-2005 02:55 PM

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 9:30 AM Carico has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 89 of 141 (266914)
12-08-2005 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by robinrohan
12-08-2005 12:28 PM


Re: More lies
robinrohan writes:
More lies and misrepresentation on the part of evos. According to the card catalog at my local library, it's 318 pages!
I am afraid your evil subtlety is lost on your average fundamentalist creationist.
Anyway, someone must have torn out some pages from the copy in your local library. I have in my bookcase, on the evolution shelf (no, really!) a copy that contains 366 pages, that's including the pages with roman numerals. Now, what important information has been removed from the book in your local library, one wonders? And by whom? And why?
I can envision a book: "The Evilution Conspiracy", unfinished manuscript found in the legacy of the late Robin Rohan (murdered by evilutionists), finished and published by Parasomnium (now in coma).
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 08-Dec-2005 09:46 PM
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 08-Dec-2005 10:15 PM

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by robinrohan, posted 12-08-2005 12:28 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by robinrohan, posted 12-08-2005 5:43 PM Parasomnium has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 102 of 141 (267097)
12-09-2005 4:18 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Coragyps
12-08-2005 8:24 PM


The evilutionist conspiracy
I am hot on the trail of the evilutionist conspiracy: if you interpret 366 pages as the number of days in a leap year, and if you realise that the seasons come full circle in a year, 'circle' suggesting that pi is implicated, "150 pages or so" could mean 151 pages, pointing to May 31 in a leap year. Which leap year? Well, if you take 318 pages and multiply that by (3.9245283 + 2), which is the real value of pi - mathematicians are keeping the truth about pi a secret - plus 2, the number of sides in the evo/creo debate, then you get 1884. Now what happened on May 31, 1884? Do I really need to remind you that on that day John Harvey Kellog patented corn flakes?
Now if I could just figure out in what language "corn flakes" means something sinister...
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 09-Dec-2005 10:35 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Coragyps, posted 12-08-2005 8:24 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by robinrohan, posted 12-09-2005 8:09 AM Parasomnium has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 104 of 141 (267124)
12-09-2005 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by robinrohan
12-09-2005 8:09 AM


Re: Does Randman know about this?
This appears to be a wild goose chase by Parasomnium, a typical tactic.
It also a typical tactic to call someone else's argument a "typical tactic". And I can't understand why you think it's a wild goose chase. Everyone knows that there are 366 days in a leap year. And pi does really have something to do with circles. It's all so true. So what's this about a wild goose chase?
On page 28 of Mayr's book (published in 2001), there is a copy of Haeckel's drawings, with a curious little comment in the caption: "Haekel [sic] had fraudulently substituted dog embryos for the human ones, but they were so similar to humans that these (if available)would have made the same point."
It's an ad homonym to call Haccle sick. And you misspell his name too. Heck, you can't even spell sick.
Anyway, I've looked up Haackle's drawings and they look like corn flakes to me. So you are asking me to believe that humans are corn flakes. That's not only perverse, it's also a contradiction. Am I to suppose your mother is a Rice Krispy?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by robinrohan, posted 12-09-2005 8:09 AM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by AdminNWR, posted 12-09-2005 8:54 AM Parasomnium has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 109 of 141 (267143)
12-09-2005 9:27 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by AdminNWR
12-09-2005 8:54 AM


Re: Off topic
AdminNWR writes:
Off topic
Right. I've been studying corn flakes for thirty years, I know what I'm talking about. But I'll shut up now. Nuff said.
Except that I'll bet you come from a box of Frosties.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by AdminNWR, posted 12-09-2005 8:54 AM AdminNWR has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024