Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9214 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Cifa.ac
Post Volume: Total: 920,096 Year: 418/6,935 Month: 418/275 Week: 135/159 Day: 13/33 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why does evolutionary science seem to be
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3974
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001


Message 49 of 107 (84538)
02-08-2004 7:23 PM


Read about the creation, or read the creation?
Well, this topic has been quiet for over a day, so I'm going to bring up the flip side of the title question.
This topic's title, as started in the title, and completed in the first sentence of message 1:
quote:
Why does evolutionary science seem to be (So hell bent on dispelling the reality of a creator?)
I flip that to:
Why does creation science seem to be (So hell bent on dispelling the reality of the creation?)
What are you to believe? What you can see in a book about the creation, or what you can see in the creation?
Or, as JonF (I believe) put it (concerning the earth's geology):
quote:
Man wrote the Bible - God wrote the rocks
The "creation scientists" are either unable or unwilling to read what is contained in the creation.
Moose

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025