Why does evolutionary science seem to be

I think that when you learn and see science, you get to see it only refers to (as MrHambre rightly said) methodological naturalism. I think Asgara babe is just saying that because of this it/there is no opinion of God, because "science" - the subject, is based on evidence.With science, proving/disproving God seems to be impossible because God could literally not take part, or add too much hydrochloric acid .Hope you know what I mean Stephen.
God bless,......Mike.

Hehe, it was just a silly joke. For e.g. There is no experiment to prove/disprove God. Because he could not want us to find him in that kind of way......he could add too much acid if no acid = God.
I'm babbling Stephen.

Fair point. I ofcourse, and you, already believe. Personally, I think believing is more important than proving. Though I do know, as you say - that God is capable of proving himself to the individual, via prayer/recieving e.t.c.I think, like Yeshua said, we should seek the Kingdom first and believe when we pray, that we recieve. You and I know that belief is the key. Scientifically - I personally think God is there to be found. But there is a vail of doubt upon the unbeliever.Nevertheless - I don't think science deals with God or seeks to prove/disprove him. I guess it deals with the "how" not the "why".I also, like Columbo, focus on the little things. I have to tie up those loose ends.[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-03-2004]