I watched the online Online lecture video awhile back and found it had some lame jokes, was unconvincing and he made some math errors IIRC.
But biological evolution within populations is much more akin to the second method
So you say anyway.
(Or, as one creationist posted repeatedly on another website, the odds against evolution are 1 720 against. He couldn't understand why folks didn't take him seriously.)
What does what one creationist supposedly said on another website have anything to do with what what you are saying here? He could have just as easily made a typo, or did not not know about the
sup tag. But you like to capitalize on that and interject it into your discussion every chance you get.
Given this, I tend to doubt those huge scare numbers when they are posted by creationists.
Of course, you are an evolutionist with an axe to grind.
™ Version 4.2