You are wrong once again Percy. The purpose of the appendix has been known for some time. It is a storage area for helpful bacteria in the digestive tract.
Firstly Vestigial does NOT MEAN THAT THAT THING IS TOTALLY USELESS, no vestigial means that the organ/bone in question no longer suits its ORIGINAL PURPOSE.
The purpose of the appendix has been known for some time. It is a storage area for helpful bacteria in the digestive tract.
Secondly if humans dint invent medicine and learned how to remove apenidcses the apendics would have been bread out why well ask yourself why do surgeoons rutinely remove a helathy appendix if they happen to be preforming surgery in the abdominal aerea. To anwser your question is because you dont really need it and it is a grater risk to your health if you do have it.
ou also don't know that science still does not have a shred of evidence to support your speculation that small random mutations can add up in complexity to form larger functioning systems
Well actualy we do have tons of evidence Evolution is as close to a fact as a fact can get.
on a side note to your referal to randomness
Genetic mutations <--- for.
The only thing scientific about your theory is that it can't be demonstrated or verified scientifically.
There are 2 possibilities to what happens to theories that are not supported by evidence or are contradicted by evidence
1. the theory hasto be revised (changed) to acomodate the contradictive evidence or the lack of evidence
2. The theory lands in the bin,trash.
This has not happened to evolution because THERE IS NO CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE AND THERE IS TONNES UPON TONES OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT, AND NEW EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT ARIVES FROM NEARLY EVERY FIELD OF CIENCE EVERY DAY!!!!!!!!!!!
The theory of creation is different because it does not play by scientist rules. Option one to what happens to theories is out of the question because your bronze age text cant be changed cause god is always right or theres no reason to believe in him or thats how your logic works anyway.
And option 2 is out of the question because that leaves you without a theory and you need one to support your silly beliefs. So what did you go and do you went against the scientific method the method that enabled you to write to me instantly from another part of the world, the method that provided your home with light ........ YOU SAID OUR THEORY IS TRUE THE FACTS ARE WRONG ALL GAZILLION OF THEM ARE WRONG AND OUR BRONZE AGED BOOK IS RIGHT. That is not science that is ANTI-SCIENCE. And that is why your theory is not a scientific theory but mumbo jumbo designed to keep people going to curch and donating loads of cash to the needy preachers.
™ Version 4.2