Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution and Probability
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 91 of 104 (64895)
11-07-2003 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by Dinker
11-03-2003 5:13 PM


Re: You seem to leap to conclusions without watching your step...
A dog cannot grasp our nature or moral code by it's own means. However we manage to impart on dogs not to bark loud, to roll over, to pee outside, to be 'good' and not to be 'bad'. How is it that an entity to which we are ineffable has grasped a basic moral structure from us and is obeying them?
You cannot train a dog not to bark; it is not possible. Dogs have a complex social structure of their own, all we do is replace the 'top dog' figure and use our influence to effect their behaviour. We do not, and can not, embue an unintelligable moral code on them. In other words you can only teach a dog to do things that are intelligable on their own terms. Dogs have a natural understanding of territory; pack, friend and not-shitting-where-you-sleep. They have a natural understanding of hierachical command (don't believe me? Do some research into how Arctic Wolves hunt), which in certain breeds (e.g. Border Collies) has been bred to an extrordinary degree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Dinker, posted 11-03-2003 5:13 PM Dinker has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024