Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Modern Cell Biology doesn't support Darwinism"
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3671 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 59 of 87 (286354)
02-14-2006 4:21 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by randman
02-14-2006 1:23 AM


Re: well, a third party corroborates
quote:
I will state categorically that the audio tape of the interview 100% supports Gillian Brown’s contention that Dawkins couldn’t answer the question
Of course he couln't... one would have to have a thorough definition of "information content of the genome" to proceed. First, it must be established what is meant by information (a point that has been firmly stressed to Garrett in this thread).
Not all questions are well defined, and as such they cannot receive answers that are both concise and truthful.
To claim that Dawkins was "stumped" is pure dishonesty and utterly ridiculous. I myself would have made a good attempt at discussing the question, and I have .0001% of the knowledge of Dawkins in this area.
There is only one thing I hate more than Dawkins' evangelical atheism and that is the blatent dishonesty displayed in such creationist propaganda, especially when in the same article, the honesty of Christians is stressed. I am ashamed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by randman, posted 02-14-2006 1:23 AM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by AdminWounded, posted 02-14-2006 5:29 AM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024