If I roll 100 dice and keep all the 1’s, remove all dice with 6’s, and re-roll all the other dice over and over again, eventually I will have a table with some amount of dice that all have 1’s on them.
You will not have 1's on them. You somehow forgot to re-roll 1's. 1's are not immortal. They have to produce offsprings. You have to re-roll them, Catholic scientist.
This is a decent analogy to evolving although it is limited.
More than limited. It is valueless.
(It doesn't take into consideration genes pleiotropy and epistatic interactions etc... It doesn't take into consideration many other allele-frequency dependancies).
RM is the rolling of the dice. NS is the “rules”, which are keep 1’s, remove 6’s and re-roll all others.
You have to re-roll 1's. If you remove 6's and 1's would have chance to fall 99% after many rollings your generation of dice will die out anyway.
111 222 333 444 555 666
111 111 111 111 116
111 111 111 114 16
111 111 111 111 6
.
.
.
1
1
6
end of story
Your dices need to proliferate themselves, you know.
(The same for that curious example of apes writing a Shakespeare's play where Natural selection copy succesfull papers and put them into typewriters again and again. Inventors of this story somehow forgotten sexual proliferation where papers from different typewriters are mixed and crossing-overed together every next generation).