Yes, if niche/hab controls macro diversity. But (speculatively) if genes can be attributed to modifying habitats for increasing biodiversity, then maybe I can assume that macro diversity is at least partly driven my genetic variation. No?
I don't know what you mean when you say "genes can be attributed to modifying habitats ...".
Maybe all we need in a "law of macro diversity" is already accounted for by ecological theory.
Yes, I think so. That is what others mean by "ad-hoc" I think. It is contingent on the environmental conditions. Obviously some environments will allow for a wider diversity to develop and others will not. I don't see that it is any big deal at all.
BTW, I think those using 'ad-hoc' should be using the word contingent.
maybe I can assume that macro diversity is at least partly driven my genetic variation. No?
I must not understand this. It is so obvious that it seems odd to say it. Diversity obviously stems from genetic variation. Mutation (and other) generates diversity at the genetic level. Whether such diversity makes it into surviving phenotypes is dependent on the environment.