Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   where was the transition within fossil record?? [Stalled: randman]
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 77 of 304 (252809)
10-18-2005 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by randman
10-18-2005 2:58 PM


Negative falsification.
randman writes:
So from a layman's perspective, it appears to me that since the fossil record now negatively falsifies ToE that evos claim it was never important in the first place.
I am glad that you at least agree that the fossil record does not positively falsify the theory of evolution.
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 18-Oct-2005 08:49 PM

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by randman, posted 10-18-2005 2:58 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by randman, posted 10-18-2005 4:00 PM Parasomnium has not replied

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 96 of 304 (252982)
10-19-2005 9:13 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Admin
10-19-2005 8:59 AM


Re: Do it yourself!
Admin writes:
Threads in which productive discussion is being stymied will be designated as nonsense threads
Percy,
Don't you think that, by designating it a 'nonsense' thread, you might create the impression that you are taking sides? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use some other indication that the thread isn't moving much?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Admin, posted 10-19-2005 8:59 AM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Yaro, posted 10-19-2005 9:16 AM Parasomnium has not replied

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 165 of 304 (253798)
10-21-2005 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by Chiroptera
10-21-2005 5:23 PM


Re: I like this language.
Ha! You beat me to it to comment on the sub-topic title. I wish people paid more attention to using it well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by Chiroptera, posted 10-21-2005 5:23 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 171 of 304 (253812)
10-21-2005 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by IrishRockhound
10-21-2005 5:43 PM


Mindset
IrishRockhound writes:
You are the one claiming it may support ID. You are the one saying the evidence shows something other than the currently accepted view. Therefore the onus is on you to present your ideas, and show us how the evidence fits ID better than the ToE. Recall that I said science is not in the business of proving a negative; we will not try to disprove your hypothesis. You must either support what you say or accept that it will be disregarded.
It's no use, Rockhound. You forget that Randman is a descendant(!) of the kind of people who used to say: "Although we say that you are a witch, to avoid the stake you must prove that you're not."
That's the mindset you're fighting.

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by IrishRockhound, posted 10-21-2005 5:43 PM IrishRockhound has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by IrishRockhound, posted 10-22-2005 5:41 AM Parasomnium has not replied

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 173 of 304 (253817)
10-21-2005 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by randman
10-21-2005 5:41 PM


Distortion
randman writes:
But hey, facts and logic don't matter here it seems to evos.
On the contrary, they're the only things that matter here to evolutionists.
A fully land mammal, hooved, not aquatic or semi-aquatic in the slightest is, by golly, a whale, because we say so!
No, because you say we say so. But we don't. You are doing what all creationists do, you distort what we say.
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 21-Oct-2005 11:02 PM

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by randman, posted 10-21-2005 5:41 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024