Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   where was the transition within fossil record?? [Stalled: randman]
michah
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 304 (244776)
09-19-2005 1:24 AM


Hi, all...
Before we get started on this newer forum, I would like to state my beliefs and presuppositions as to allow yourselves to fully understand where I am coming from.
* I am a devout Christian who believes the Bible to be 100% accurate
* I believe in micro- but not macro- evolution
* I am interested in recieving information which might serve to either prove or disprove evolution on the topic being presented.
---Now that that's all over, to the question. I understand that there are several other strands and forums discussing relatively the same topic, however, upon review of such forums, have become frustrated due to the elusions of the persons involved to procure any substantial evidence beyond that which they heard from somebody who was quoting someone else at the time. I understand that at times generalizations of such topics are required, but come on people!! Present at least a few decent facts or links to factual, studied evidence before pouring out your heart into an area you haven't even taken to research for yourself...
Anyways, I present this question to any interested in reading and replying to my forum... If, as "assumed" by evolutionary scientists, the world is some billion years old and we, as non-designated species are in constant transition, with projected THOUSANDS of stages within our develpement, with a fossil record beyond belief to "supposedly" support such and ideal, are we unable, or incapable of presenting ANY SIGNIFICANT finds which would SCIENTIFICALLY prove that belief? And even if we do have a few scraps, why, if we are in constant transition, including the staggering collection of fossils stated earlier, are there so few in contrast? Shouldn't there be THOUSANDS of such fossils, just, if not better preserved than their respective ancestors and decendants?
-I am avidly awaiting responses from ANY view-points, not simply limited to a biased view of either solely evolutionist or creationist (although stating your position in the beginning would be deeply helpful in allowing a more informed interpretation of what you might state).
Thanks again,
Michah
This message has been edited by michah, 09-19-2005 10:50 PM
This message has been edited by Admin, 10-20-2005 07:39 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 09-19-2005 8:59 AM michah has replied
 Message 5 by Yaro, posted 09-20-2005 10:31 AM michah has not replied
 Message 6 by Chiroptera, posted 09-20-2005 11:05 AM michah has not replied
 Message 8 by Modulous, posted 09-20-2005 12:50 PM michah has not replied

michah
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 304 (245050)
09-19-2005 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
09-19-2005 8:59 AM


is that acceptable?
I aim to please...if there are other problems, just let me know and they will be promptly addressed. Thanks for the time...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 09-19-2005 8:59 AM Admin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024