Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   where was the transition within fossil record?? [Stalled: randman]
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 304 (254168)
10-23-2005 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Yaro
09-20-2005 10:31 AM


Majority Accomodates Themselves
Michah:
quote:
I believe in micro- but not macro- evolution
Yaro:
quote:
No such thing. What creationists call 'micro' and 'macro' are the same thing. Biologists make no such distinction.
Logically, micro and macro makes sense. There needs to be some term for designating between intra-species adjustments and bonafide transitional evolutionary progress. Why doesn't micro/macro fit this ticket?
It seems to me that the majority scientific view eliminates these provocative terms to weasle out of the debates these terms propose.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Yaro, posted 09-20-2005 10:31 AM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by mike the wiz, posted 10-23-2005 10:37 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 195 by NosyNed, posted 10-23-2005 10:38 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 196 by crashfrog, posted 10-23-2005 10:47 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 197 by halucigenia, posted 10-23-2005 10:52 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 198 by Yaro, posted 10-23-2005 10:54 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 200 by mark24, posted 10-23-2005 12:28 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 215 by coffee_addict, posted 10-23-2005 5:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024