natural selection is wrong

When in doubt, spout gibberish, name drop authors you have never read, and insult everyone. It is a recipe similar to Hungarian goulasch except that it does not taste as good and takes less time to make (not to mention that it is calory free).

Dan and Mammuthus walk into a bar full of good looking women..of course they all are identical since

quote:

---

comparisons don't actually occur in nature

---

...Mammuthus says "I'm bailing since I have no chance against Greek God Stud Dan" even though Mammuthus and Dan are identical since

quote:

---

comparisons don't actually occur in nature

---

Dan slips Mammuthus 5 bucks and whispers his thanks that he got his line right.

I will if you will

quote:

---

See how easy this is?

---

It's even easier than that. We can simplfy the world by denying that there are any genetic or phenotypic differences among individuals of a species. Thus Dan and I are both Greek God Sex studs (and I want my 5 bucks back!). And since there are no differences among individuals, those that are sterile due to mutation reproduce at a rate of 1 and those that are are fertile reproduce at a rate of 1. And when you put a check next to each individual that reproduces, you can under no circumstances indicate to which individual the offspring belong. One might inadvertantly identify a trait that favors reproduction over other variants and then we would be stuck again in this comparison thingy that we must avoid lest reality intrude in our dillusional world.

quote:

---

I would like to ask a moderator to reject your post on account of avoidance of argumentation offered several times before. I think that is the only way this discussion can progress to a conclusion, with an impartial moderator arbritating points like that.

---

Why not ask Percy/Admin to allow you and Wounded King to start a thread in the "Great Debate" Forum? This would provide you with exactly what you are asking for. And even better for you, nobody but Wounded King and yourself would be allowed to post.

It could be worse...at least instead of calling all scientists nazi's, Sy now calls us all Newtonian

quote:

---

The point is that your 'individual theory' doesn't explain anything, it is simply looking whether one specific organism reproduces or not, you don't even seem interested in how many offspring it has in case it leads to invidious comparisons

---

It is the Syamsu wash-rinse-repeat strategywash: make an inane claim (evolution can be measured looking at a single individual)-rinse: provide no evidence, ignore all counter evidence, demand references and then not read them, quote out of context or misquote completely, whine like a smacked puppy that nobody takes you seriously-repeat: After a set number of posts, just start restating the same inane claims that were at the beginning of the thread.You may want to consider WK that you are in a protracted argument with an internet troll who will not be bothered to clarify or support what he is saying because 1) he does not understand (and is not interested in) biology or genetics 2) seems to feel he somehow increases his importance by posting here..who knows, maybe EvC helps him with the ladies in Nganjuk.

quote:

---

You're welcome to contribute. Of course the rule is that you should have something new argument, or at least a new way of expressing the arguments.

---

Funny that you exclude yourself from this "rule"