TheDarin writes:
In message #47
A simple "Yes, I believe mutations created the human reproductive system 100% without a doubt" would do as a response if that's what you believe - I'm just trying to find out if the common EVO really believes that unintelligent random mutations created EYELIDS and the perfectly compatible male and female organs NECESSARY for human reproduction by sheer blobby gooey dribble that just happened to get lucky enough to create the system required to create eyelids and conceive and birth another human; without telling the other blobby gooey dribble what it needed to look like in order participate in the process.
What are "unintelligent random mutations"? Are you implying that there is an intelligence factor to mutations?
Is your definition of evolution "a sheer blobby gooey dribble talking to other sheer blobby gooey dribbles"? What do sheer blobby gooey dribbles have to do with the development of eyelids or human reproductive systems? Maybe you are referring to semen.
I assume that you are describing
your erroneous definition of the evolutionary process in the most disgusting way you can think of as a way to prove some point. It does not. It just makes you sound ignorant.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley
™ Version 4.2