Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Eyelids Evolve?
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 41 of 117 (446544)
01-06-2008 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by TheDarin
01-06-2008 3:37 PM


I suggest you quit stalling.
Rahvin's question is perfectly reasonable.
Prove god.
Think of a word right now. Got it? OK, now prove to me that you thought that word. Wouldn't it be frustrating for someone to tell you that you did not have that thought in your head. You KNOW you did. But science has no instrument to prove such a thing existed.
Wrong. It is very easy, as a matter of fact. An fMRI would show the appropriate area of the brain lighting up in response to the thought.
Since I don't expect you to know what an fMRI is:
"Functional magnetic resonance imaging". It is a neuroimaging technique used to study activity in the brain. It shows which structures are active during particular mental operations.
Now. Will you please answer Rahvin's question?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 3:37 PM TheDarin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 4:29 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 42 of 117 (446548)
01-06-2008 3:51 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by TheDarin
01-06-2008 3:25 PM


Re: limbs, organs, and bilateral symmetry
I want you to think...really think...could random mutations that have zero intelligence create the human sexual reproductive system?????????????
Ah. The mark of a truly rational debate. 13 question marks.
Please stick to the topic.
You have been asked repeatedly to discuss eyelids.
No limbs. No sexual reproduction. No organs. Eyelids.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 3:25 PM TheDarin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 4:49 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 49 of 117 (446599)
01-06-2008 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by TheDarin
01-06-2008 5:10 PM


Re: Think of a Word
I could not observe the exact word in your thoughts.
Don't get too cocky.
We're getting closer.
An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words
Brain and Language
Volume 93, Issue 1, April 2005, Pages 20-31
Comparison of rhyming and word generation with fMRI
Human Brain Mapping
Volume 10, Issue 3 , Pages 99 - 106
Processing Words with Emotional Connotation:
An fMRI Study of Time Course and Laterality in Rostral Frontal and Retrosplenial Cortices
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
2004, 16:167-177.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 5:10 PM TheDarin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 6:24 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 52 of 117 (446631)
01-06-2008 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by TheDarin
01-06-2008 6:24 PM


Re: Think of a Word
Please do not respond to this thread unless you have something to add about eyelids. Your post had nothing to do with eyelids.
I dearly hope this means you've decided to abide by Forum Guidelines.
Which would mean no more OT business about words/sexual reproduction/limbs/organs.
In Message 13, you abandoned discussion of eyelids.
I'll move on with a "hmmmm" but the symmetry and order we see simply does not compute with randomness. May I move on since I've found someone that responds with words rather than attitude???
Since you've finally decided to return the discussion to eyelids, will you please do Rahvin the courtesy of responding to his post in Message 12?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 6:24 PM TheDarin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 8:10 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 58 of 117 (446651)
01-06-2008 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by TheDarin
01-06-2008 8:10 PM


Re: Think of a Word
Again. Message 12.
Rahvin took the trouble to carefully rebut your assertions.
Please specifically address the points he made.
"Huh-uh" is simply not enough.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 8:10 PM TheDarin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by TheDarin, posted 01-06-2008 8:38 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 91 of 117 (448685)
01-14-2008 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Aladon
01-14-2008 7:23 PM


Re: denial?
You're off to a roaring start.
Since you are a new member, I would like to remind you of 3 things (tho others have mentioned them previously):
1. This is a science thread. Which means, when discussing a science topic, you are obligated to provide evidence of your assertions.
2. You need to stay on topic.
3. It would do you a world of good to read a thread before responding.
Okay, is there any transitional evidence for the eyelid or any other of modern mans parts or functions?
The transitional "forms" of the eyelid have been covered in detail in this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Aladon, posted 01-14-2008 7:23 PM Aladon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Aladon, posted 01-15-2008 5:31 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 113 of 117 (448868)
01-15-2008 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Aladon
01-15-2008 6:50 AM


Re: Yes, denial
By the way, you're very aggressive.
You haven't seen anything yet. If you've thin skin, this isn't the place for you.
I'd like to add another item to the list I posted previously:
4. This isn't a chat room.
Content free (Message 102, Message 105) and chatty posts are discouraged.
Threads are limited to 300. You are needlessly chewing up bandwidth with your 1 and 2 sentence nonsense.
I suggest you carefully consider your responses and -- since this is a science thread -- keep the Forum Guidelines in mind, particularly Rule 4:
Points should be supported with evidence and/or reasoned argumentation. Address rebuttals through the introduction of additional evidence or by enlarging upon the argument. Do not repeat previous points without further elaboration. Avoid bare assertions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Aladon, posted 01-15-2008 6:50 AM Aladon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Aladon, posted 01-15-2008 6:38 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2669 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 116 of 117 (448956)
01-15-2008 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Aladon
01-15-2008 6:38 PM


Re: Yes, denial
Another content free post.
Please address the topic.
We have a thread for moderation. Message 1. You've already been warned once by a moderator. If you continue with this nonsense, I will post a complaint to the moderation thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Aladon, posted 01-15-2008 6:38 PM Aladon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Aladon, posted 01-15-2008 7:08 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024