Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Eyelids Evolve?
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 67 of 117 (448584)
01-14-2008 4:27 AM


Why do my nictitating membranes feel heavy when I'm tired? If the brain tells me it's time to sleep, when did that connection with the nictitating membrane happen?

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 12:50 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 69 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 12:50 PM Aladon has not replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 70 of 117 (448642)
01-14-2008 5:38 PM


quote:
You may as well ask when the "connection" with the brain for making your heart beat, or making your lungs breathe form. The simple answer is, the "connection" evolved as the structures did. Your lungs are a great example of an autonomous action that is still partially voluntary (you can hold your breath, but you can't stop your heart for a few seconds, for example).
All you are doing is explaining a few of the body's basic functions, but you replace 'God created it that way', with - 'it evolved'.
You are not really answering the question.

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 5:54 PM Aladon has not replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 72 of 117 (448644)
01-14-2008 6:08 PM


Excuse me, evolution has no mechanism. Evolution is only a theory, has only ever been a theory and scientifically is being dismantled year on year. Trying to explain it is such a problem that mainstream scientific literature even considers the possibility of life dropping in from outer space, called the theory of "panspermia"
"God did it" does in actual fact have a mechanism. God making it happen is a mechanism is it not? What you are doing is merely disposing of the 'God did it' theory because you have prepositioned yourself as an atheist or agnostic. You are not really examining the facts in a scholarly manner. Richard Dawkins does exactly the same thing.
If we are to really discover truth, we must examine.

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 6:20 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 74 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 6:25 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 81 by subbie, posted 01-14-2008 7:11 PM Aladon has not replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 75 of 117 (448651)
01-14-2008 6:39 PM


Replying to Rahvin
Oh dear. You've obviously never read the The Origin of Species then? Evolution may not be coined as a word, but the book covers the theory extensively.
Also, you are quite mistaken on a theological front here also. People are not born as Christians, they are born as sinners. They need to make a rational decision at some point in their life to accept Jesus as Lord and Saviour and move from darkness into light. From death to life, so to speak.
So, for the first 25 years of your life you may have had a belief in God. Not the same.
Edited by Aladon, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:22 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 76 of 117 (448652)
01-14-2008 6:42 PM


quote:
"Christians support evolution unless they are set on denying God and passing on a culture of ignorance to their children."
Utter rubbish. Not responding to that.
Edited by Aladon, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Chiroptera, posted 01-14-2008 6:48 PM Aladon has replied
 Message 78 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 6:48 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 79 of 117 (448655)
01-14-2008 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Chiroptera
01-14-2008 6:48 PM


Thanks, wasn't used to this interface.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Chiroptera, posted 01-14-2008 6:48 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 80 of 117 (448658)
01-14-2008 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by jar
01-14-2008 6:48 PM


Re: denial?
With respect, I neither read letters from so called Saints or letters from Clergy. There were Anglican Bishops of the 1960's declaring that God was dead. A Christian youth movement responded in song with the words, "God is Not Dead."
I read the Bible and the works of Scholars who do not 'interpret' God's Word, but divide it and examine it correctly. I also read scientific works if they are written honestly.
What about you? I've read some of your remarks elsewhere and it's obvious you have never really studied the Bible? What gives you the right to comment on it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 6:48 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 7:14 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 84 of 117 (448669)
01-14-2008 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by jar
01-14-2008 7:14 PM


Re: denial?
Is that the royal 'we', who will examine what I write?
A Christian for over 60 years? You don't know how many humans were on the ark or that Noah would have taken food on the ark with him. Ever took an animal on a trip before?
Anyway, you are correct on one thing, we are discussing eyelids, biology and the likes.
Okay, is there any transitional evidence for the eyelid or any other of modern mans parts or functions?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 7:14 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by jar, posted 01-14-2008 7:30 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 90 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:40 PM Aladon has replied
 Message 91 by molbiogirl, posted 01-14-2008 7:46 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 85 of 117 (448671)
01-14-2008 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Rahvin
01-14-2008 7:22 PM


Re: Replying to Rahvin
quote:
Ah, the No True Scotsman fallacy. Have to love that one. I clearly cannot have been a real Christian, or really have accepted Jesus, because I later became an Atheist.
Almost true, but you must be reading between the lines because that is not what I suggested.
Evolutionary theory may have progressed, but it's still a theory.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:22 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:32 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 88 of 117 (448678)
01-14-2008 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Rahvin
01-14-2008 7:32 PM


Re: Replying to Rahvin
Hilarious. Gravity is a provable theory. I refer you to Isaac Newton.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:32 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by subbie, posted 01-14-2008 7:37 PM Aladon has not replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 92 of 117 (448689)
01-14-2008 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Rahvin
01-14-2008 7:40 PM


Re: denial?
quote:
in other words, they were herbivores and could eat things like grass
Well Adam would have been a herbivore as you call it. Thats why God gave him that organ.
AS for Coccyx, it is just the end of the vertebral column that supports the head at its beginning and it must end somewhere. Wherever it ends, evolutionists will be sure to call it a vestigial tail.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 7:40 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 8:04 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 95 by Quetzal, posted 01-14-2008 8:31 PM Aladon has not replied
 Message 96 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 8:34 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 97 of 117 (448765)
01-15-2008 5:31 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by molbiogirl
01-14-2008 7:46 PM


Re: denial?
You didn't notice the reason why we went off topic? As is normally the case in such discussions, evolutionists make sweeping scientific claims with NO evidence whatsoever. I was challenging that.
I refer you to 'God did it', not being a mechanism, etc.
Sorry for breathing - it's an involuntary function. Some kind of deal between my brain and my lungs apparently.
Edited by Aladon, : missed a bit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by molbiogirl, posted 01-14-2008 7:46 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Vacate, posted 01-15-2008 6:19 AM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 98 of 117 (448767)
01-15-2008 6:13 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Rahvin
01-14-2008 8:34 PM


Re: denial?
Let's bring things back on topic then. As posted earlier in this thread, humans have a vestigial remnant of the nictitating membrane and some of the musculature that it would use were it still present. This is a vestigial feature, and nictitating membranes are a similar structure to eyelids. Note, however, that some creatures (like cats) have both - eyelids did not arise from nictitating membranes, but it would appear that, in some species (like us) eyelids have replaced them.
Neither of your comments addressed that.
Can we look at why evolutionists are clutching at this word - Vestigial.
Vestigial = Relating to a body part that has become small and lost its use because of evolutionary change. The American Heritage Science Dictionary
I cannot discuss eyelids without first discussing this word and it's misuse. Is that permitted on this thread or must we start another and come back here once we have established some rules on the use of language?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Rahvin, posted 01-14-2008 8:34 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Rahvin, posted 01-15-2008 10:37 AM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 100 of 117 (448770)
01-15-2008 6:50 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by Vacate
01-15-2008 6:19 AM


Re: Yes, denial
Yet another 'off topic' post about off topic posts.
Yes, have a go at my lack of knowledge.(your opinion) I didn't know I was in the company of such brilliant scholars. By the way, you're very aggressive.
Okay, so we cant make challenges if we fall below a certain bar of learning. Okay - noted.
Any threads on Sesame Street?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Vacate, posted 01-15-2008 6:19 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-15-2008 7:19 AM Aladon has replied
 Message 103 by Vacate, posted 01-15-2008 8:58 AM Aladon has replied
 Message 113 by molbiogirl, posted 01-15-2008 3:06 PM Aladon has replied

  
Aladon
Junior Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 22
From: Scotland
Joined: 01-14-2008


Message 102 of 117 (448776)
01-15-2008 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by Archer Opteryx
01-15-2008 7:19 AM


Re: Yes, denial
Thanks for the welcome.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-15-2008 7:19 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024