Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5051 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 49 of 317 (21018)
10-29-2002 11:21 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Mammuthus
10-29-2002 10:09 AM
|
|
My understanding is that the "morphogenetic field" as some Ho etc embryology may suggest IS NOT the same thing as Sheldrake's "morphic resonance" which rather appears to make a monkey out of Mammuthus's word program use etc but this as far as have been able to ascetain if anything would have to have been an insectivore and not a primate but what do i know?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by Mammuthus, posted 10-29-2002 10:09 AM | | Mammuthus has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 54 by Mammuthus, posted 10-30-2002 4:47 AM | | Brad McFall has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2