Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   molecular genetic evidence for a multipurpose genome
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 317 (20966)
10-28-2002 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Mammuthus
10-28-2002 4:23 AM


Mammuthus & Peter
I recently read a population genetics article where the researcher pointed out that, without exception, their field of study related to microevolution. Yes, just as Erwin did (I feel like Brad dropping names wihtout refs like that) this researcher used the dirty micro word.
I am happy to call it evolution but I can understand creationists who don't want to call it that. In any case it has almost nothing to do with macroevolution.
Citing allelic frequency changes, and allelic mutations, as evidence for macroevolution is extremely misleading.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 10-28-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Mammuthus, posted 10-28-2002 4:23 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Quetzal, posted 10-29-2002 2:02 AM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 45 by Mammuthus, posted 10-29-2002 3:33 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024