Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,849 Year: 4,106/9,624 Month: 977/974 Week: 304/286 Day: 25/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Marsupial evolution
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2134 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 55 of 91 (472005)
06-19-2008 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by randman
06-19-2008 10:19 PM


Re: placental vs. marsupial
But you list no facts except the classifications by evos. You offer no real comprehensive data or even much data at all.
As opposed to the classifications of creationists? That "kinds" nonsense? What a joke!
It's a big internet; perhaps you could take a look around and see if you could find some of this information for yourself. But you have to get away from the creationist websites. They have a tendency to lie about science.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by randman, posted 06-19-2008 10:19 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by randman, posted 06-19-2008 10:29 PM Coyote has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2134 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 58 of 91 (472017)
06-19-2008 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by randman
06-19-2008 10:29 PM


Re: real science
Let's see if, for example, human beings and placental mice are indeed more similar than marsupial and placental mice, or any of these claims hold true. Just presenting a few traits and comparing them, cherry-picking the data, is not vigorously testing the concept.
"Real science" is not conducted in internet chatrooms, nor do those creationists who deny the scientific method have any role in it.
All of the questions you are asking will be addressed in the scientific literature. What we say here is not going to affect the course of science a whit, nor are the little "victories" or "defeats" of any substance.
If you really want the answers to your questions, a bit of research will find them for you. If all you want to do is tilt against big science, because it comes up with answers inconvenient to a particular religious belief, that seems such a waste of time.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by randman, posted 06-19-2008 10:29 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by randman, posted 06-20-2008 1:29 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024