Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Sequence comparisons (Bioinformatics?)
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 1 of 42 (215440)
06-08-2005 6:45 PM


In the thread "Is convergent evolution evidence against common descent?" the topic of comparing genetic and protein sequences came up:
(Message 138)
This is, of course, relevent to that topic but it turns out there is enough information and resources on the web to have some fun with this. This topic is to spin off this area alone from the convergent topic.
The ClustalW form at http://align.genome.jp/ , allows for comparisons to be made.
I would like this topic to contain explanations (in considerable detail) of what is done by the program at that site and more on how to use it.
We can also offer up questions about and examples of sequence comparisons here.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by NosyNed, posted 06-08-2005 8:28 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 4 by MangyTiger, posted 06-08-2005 11:17 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 5 by MangyTiger, posted 06-08-2005 11:31 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 16 by Entomologista, posted 06-11-2005 12:13 AM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 41 by Brad McFall, posted 07-10-2005 6:45 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 3 of 42 (215478)
06-08-2005 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by NosyNed
06-08-2005 6:45 PM


An explanation
I have a rough idea of what is going on with the CLUSTALW program but I would like a 3 or 4 paragraphs explanation if WK (or someone could give that). The help is obviously aimed only at those "in the business" and is heavily jargon loaded.
I presume that the program attempts to "line up" the input sequences as best as it can. It then calculates a percentage of match. (The PIM "percentage identity matrix").
Correct?
I would like some hint of what it means, how it may be correctly used and how it may be incorrectly used. What anomolies might one create?
Why is the percentage called a percentage identity matrix?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by NosyNed, posted 06-08-2005 6:45 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by zyncod, posted 06-09-2005 1:52 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 30 of 42 (216383)
06-12-2005 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by randman
06-11-2005 5:24 PM


Nearly?
74 and 76 are nearly identical in some respects.
What are those respects? What does having similar percentages mean? What is "too close"? What is not close enough?
Are these not all relative numbers to position animals relative to each other?
There are some proteins that are identical across a wide range of animals are there not? If we picked those would a series of 100's result? Would that matter or be meaningful? In what way?
(I'm not called NOSY for nuttin' you know. )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by randman, posted 06-11-2005 5:24 PM randman has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 33 of 42 (216471)
06-12-2005 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by mark24
06-12-2005 3:58 PM


Other than percentages??
It's the type & location of differences that are informative in deriving trees, not the just the percentile number of differences.
In what way are all these used to determine a tree? Is there somewhere explaining it in some detail?
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by mark24, posted 06-12-2005 3:58 PM mark24 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by mark24, posted 06-13-2005 3:44 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024