Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,519 Year: 3,776/9,624 Month: 647/974 Week: 260/276 Day: 32/68 Hour: 1/12


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are mutations enough to explain natural selection?
John
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 95 (28346)
01-03-2003 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Eximius
01-02-2003 11:28 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Eximius:
How does natural selection favour a mutation that, while advantageous, is not likely to increase the carriers chance of survival or reproduction.
How do you define 'advantageous' if not in terms of survival? What you seem to be asking is "How does NS favor a mutation that is advantageous -- contributing to survival and reproduction -- yet does not contribute to survival and reproduction?" Something is amiss.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Eximius, posted 01-02-2003 11:28 PM Eximius has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024