Expectations For The New Obama Democrat Government

Piss for brains (cavediver) writes: Buz, dont bother, your trying to reason with puke bag liberals and we know that what is right or wrong is never an issue with liberals, its always about thier agendas. We also know that liberalism is a mental disorder and the ones you are trying to reason with are classic examples, dont waste your time.Buzz dont worry about the terroist's, these liberals will destroy your country from within, or they will slowly give it away one "right" at a time. I have two bumper stickers on the back of my car, one reads. "Atheism, Evolution and Humanism, AKA, Willful Stupidity", the other one says, Liberals and Criminals are birds of a feather and both are your REAL threat to National Security"Your wasing your time Buz but have fun anyway.D BertotEdited by Bertot, : No reason given.

Bertot writes: Huntard writes:I wonder, do you happen to see how Cavediver treats people in his responses? Do you give him the same repremands that you do me and others, for off comments or sarcasm? Or is it just the fellas you disagree with? Since I was not talking to you but that "bucket mouth" form the UK, you should not be offended in any respect, correct? 1. Really, exacally what kind of liberal are you?2. Anyone who ignores simple principles of common sense to advance an agenda.3. Would not anyone who ignores basic principles of common sense and rational need professional help? Trust me there is no goal here to piss people off. All anyone has to do with you fellas to get you torked off is simple disagree with you or have a different opinion about an issue and that sets you fellas running. Really Huntard you should not take responses to others so personal. The one I wrote it to probably understood its content and its sarcasm. Hes a bombastic clown that needs to be called on the carpet from time to time, or are you just ignoring his posts?D BertotD Bertot

CDYou really are blind to your bombastic stupidity arent you? Being a part of the mainstream that refuse to acknowledge your arrogance as intelligence, is indeed an honor. Oh yeah thats right, none of this really exists anyway, Im just imagining it correct? Do you mean that type of intelligence. Give me a break clown.D Bertot

In the News. "Vatican forgives John Lennon for his Jesus comment". Wonderful. Hey cavediver I wrote some new lyrics just for you."Imagine theres no John Lennon, its easy if you try. Hey guess what theres not, hes dead"Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

The H man writes: The Bertot writes: If you can tolerate Cavedivers abuse mine should serve as no real problem. Apologies are not necessary with me, I expect such behavior from yourself and the other nutty liberals here, ha ha. Huntard writes: Yes what? you do agree Cavediver is an abusive putz "Not bound by authority", pretty much describes why liberals are tantamount to criminals for all intents and purposes. Thanks for the dictionary definition to cooroborate my point. Take a close look at it again. No. just anyone who refuses to adhere to authority as is indicated by the definition. Anyone who ignores rational sane behavior in place of anarchyD BertotEdited by Bertot, : No reason given.

DA writes:While I liked some of his music and the beatles are my favorite group.I pretty much thought he was a nut when he was alive as well. So to be totally consistent I made fun of him when he was abusive twords Christianity as well.The Bertot--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

DA writesActually most if not all of these examples are anrchy and liberalism. The results which came about may be more benificial than the previous condition, but the end does not justify the means. In the instances where there is obvious physical abuse and death, for no obvious or justified reason, the government is not acting in a sane manner, so a person has a given right to protect and defend themselves, or have others protect them. Otherwise it should be non violent change that brigs about change in policies.While protest is a given right, it should not result in violence, which is characteristic of so many groups on both sides, neither of which is sane and both are anrchist. Tryanny in whatever form is not justified, even if you want to start another country. While England (no doubt one of Cavedivers realatives, ha ha) were tyranical, no amount of violence is justified to affect change. Thats assuming morality is not subjective and there is a definate right and wrong. But then this is where the discussion starts all over again, around and around we go."Render unto Ceaser those things that are Ceasers and unto God the things that are Gods". "We must obey God rather than man", "Submit to them that have the rule over you". "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers for they are ordained of God" etc, etc. Yes even the ones that go astray as did the great king Saul. Yet David would not bring an accusation against Gods annointed or lift a hand to harm him. Michael would not do this either against Lucifer, he only carried out Gods orders to cast him out.Christ only advocated non adherence when it was in conflict with Gods commands or wishes. Yet he never advocated violene or change that resulted in mental, physical abuse or loss of life.However, if one does not recognize even a standard of morality then it becomes a free for all.BertotEdited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

DA writes:Really. I did not know I was doing this? Am I getting paid for it, because I could use the money. What prison are you refering to?As I suspected, I thought you were oblivious to cavedivers obvious abuse. How in the world could you ever be objective?D Bertot

DA writes: Most if not all activist liberals advocate anarchy through thier actions. For example when Onfrie and others openly admit that they smoke pot and take ILLEGAL drugs they are involving themselves in ANRCHY against the law. If they are not then please tell me what they are doing. Are they simply advocating thier liberalism? Oh, only if this were practiced it would be a wonderful world. Freedom is not freedom to do anything you want but freedom with in the law. Equal rights are not the right to violate the law in practice or intention.I certainly do not agree with such things as property tax or inheritence tax, but I am required to follow the law regardless of my personal convictions as to why I dont like it or think it is wrong. Basically?While I am an American citizen and proud of my country. The colonists were anarchist no matter how you twist it. The other examples you provided do not fall within this category because one nation defending itself against another is defense not anarchy. One nation is independant of anothers laws and rules.I can say this to you because I am not a Squid or anchor clanker as yourself but was a member of a real service The Air Force, ha ha. But swabbies have thier functions as well I suppose, Ha ah again. A persons life is not decided in a single action or even several. The colonists were an anrchists. What they were for thier whole life as relates to God is a different story. Situation ethics is a myth and in violation to Gods will. If I lie aboout someone in a closet because someone will kill them if I tell, its still a lie. My favorite Old Testament character Abraham lied to Pharoah about his wife to protect her and keep her, but it was lie nonetheless. Except for insolated icesodents, he was overall faithful to God and called the Father of the faithful. You say YOUR war. Do you not agree that we should defend ourselves or others that need assistance from AGGRESSORS? Cavediver would be a prisoner now if it were not for my relatives taking a stance against the Nazis and he would not be able to bore me with his Vacuous speeches, ha ha. Ha ha againD BertotEdited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.