Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Saddam's Execution could become a reality?
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 30 (238099)
08-28-2005 8:16 PM


The reason that Saddam being executed comes into the picture is from an article from yahoo.com, that I just read.
http://news.yahoo.com/..._afp/iraqexecutesaddam_050828185600
But if this is a real prospect, the Iraqi president has bravely taken a stance that a lot of America may be against unfortunately. He says in the article:
quote:
Should a death sentence be issued against the former dictator, "I will not sign it," he said.
"I am a man of principles. I cannot forego my principles for the sake of my post. If there is a clash between the post and the principles, I will give up the post and keep the principles," Talabani said in a snippet aired in advance of the full interview broadcast.
This article leaves me with a question, about Jalal Talabani.
Was he put in office through USA intervention?

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 08-29-2005 9:28 PM joshua221 has replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 30 (238400)
08-29-2005 8:56 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 30 (238410)
08-29-2005 9:07 PM


Does anyone know about Talibani?
That statement makes me think that he is a great leader, but he could be a US forced president, which would most likely make me think otherwise.

porteus@gmail.com

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 4 of 30 (238419)
08-29-2005 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by joshua221
08-28-2005 8:16 PM


Was he put in office through USA intervention?
More or less. He was appointed by the US as the head of the Interim Iraq Governing Council. He was elected as President of Iraq by the National Assembly following that body's reformation during Iraq's most recent elections.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by joshua221, posted 08-28-2005 8:16 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by joshua221, posted 08-29-2005 9:47 PM crashfrog has not replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 30 (238426)
08-29-2005 9:47 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by crashfrog
08-29-2005 9:28 PM


quote:
More or less. He was appointed by the US as the head of the Interim Iraq Governing Council. He was elected as President of Iraq by the National Assembly following that body's reformation during Iraq's most recent elections.
Oh man that ruins everything. Automatically now I don't trust him even with such a sweet quote. Could be another Ngo Dinh Diem.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by crashfrog, posted 08-29-2005 9:28 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 8:51 AM joshua221 has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5698 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 6 of 30 (238542)
08-30-2005 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by joshua221
08-29-2005 9:47 PM


You don't trust him because he was put on the IIG (Iraqi Interim Government) council by the CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority)?
Do you not trust anyone that was put on the IIG council by the CPA?
If not, how would you have selcted individuals to run the IIG?
This message has been edited by Tal, 08-30-2005 08:51 AM

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by joshua221, posted 08-29-2005 9:47 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 08-30-2005 8:59 AM Tal has replied
 Message 9 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:17 PM Tal has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 7 of 30 (238545)
08-30-2005 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Tal
08-30-2005 8:51 AM


What happened to the Mayor of baghdad? I heard that he was kicked out office by Gunmen?
But I cannot find any follow-up stories?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Aug-2005 09:00 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 8:51 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 9:17 AM CK has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5698 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 8 of 30 (238547)
08-30-2005 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by CK
08-30-2005 8:59 AM


Full Story Here
I found this quote noteworthy.
"Elected officials are just removed by force. We live in a militia state even with American troops here. Imagine when they leave. It will be worse than Saddam Hussein's time."
The old mayor is currently living with US forces.
"This is terrible for Iraq. It means any future elections will mean nothing because gunmen can just walk into any office and remove and install whoever they want."
/agree
Let's see how this plays out. I'm sure this is high on the state department's list of things to do lately.

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by CK, posted 08-30-2005 8:59 AM CK has not replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 30 (238601)
08-30-2005 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Tal
08-30-2005 8:51 AM


The thing is that we use the
quote:
IIG (Iraqi Interim Government) council by the CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority)
to do things for us, and for the benefit of the USA, sometimes hardly taking into consideration the lives of those under the authorities. Consider the self-immolations in Vietnam under a ruler of South Vietname who we put on top with Catholic wishes, the people protested his rule with self-immolations, and various other protests until the people staged a coup and killed him. Our fight against supposed communism made life for those in South Vietnam horrible.
That's why I stopped trusting our government with putting leaders in other countries to power.
This message has been edited by prophex, 08-30-2005 01:20 PM

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 8:51 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 1:31 PM joshua221 has replied
 Message 21 by coffee_addict, posted 08-31-2005 4:04 AM joshua221 has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5698 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 10 of 30 (238607)
08-30-2005 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by joshua221
08-30-2005 1:17 PM


The thing is that we use the (IIG)to do things for us, and for the benefit of the USA, sometimes hardly taking into consideration the lives of those under the authorities.
I didn't ask for your opinion on whether or not the US "controls" the IIG. But since you bring this up, they don't. I've seen it first hand.
Now, answer my question.
How would you go about setting up the new government?
That's why I stopped trusting our government with putting leaders in other countries to power.
You do know it is an INTERIM government right? They will eventually elect their own leaders.
*EDIT*
And what is with the photo? I promise I can post more graphic ones. Here is a suicide bomber that didn't quite make it to his target.
*REEDIT*
Don't want to scare anyone with the pic, so I'll just link it.
Inside the Green Zone
This message has been edited by Tal, 08-30-2005 01:40 PM
This message has been edited by Tal, 08-30-2005 01:41 PM

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:17 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:42 PM Tal has replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 30 (238613)
08-30-2005 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tal
08-30-2005 1:31 PM


quote:
I didn't ask for your opinion on whether or not the US "controls" the IIG. But since you bring this up, they don't. I've seen it first hand.
Tell me about your first hand experience. It was created by the U.S. We put leaders into office there.
quote:
How would you go about setting up the new government?
I can see you were in the Army, what gives you the right to kill people, change their way of life, and destroy their culture, to fit it the way you want it, or the way we have it?
Empathy is non-existant as we reign terror on others. - A line from a song I wrote.
This message has been edited by prophex, 08-30-2005 01:43 PM

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 1:31 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 1:48 PM joshua221 has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5698 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 12 of 30 (238615)
08-30-2005 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by joshua221
08-30-2005 1:42 PM


I can see you were in the Army, what gives you the right to kill people, change their way of life, and destroy their culture, to fit it the way you want it, or the way we have it?
You are avoiding the question...again.
How would you set up the new government?
what gives you the right to kill people, change their way of life, and destroy their culture, to fit it the way you want it, or the way we have it?
Didn't some middle eastern gentlement try this on Sept 11?

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:42 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:57 PM Tal has replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 30 (238618)
08-30-2005 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Tal
08-30-2005 1:48 PM


quote:
what gives you the right to kill people, change their way of life, and destroy their culture, to fit it the way you want it, or the way we have it?
quote:
Didn't some middle eastern gentlement try this on Sept 11?
No, they were fighting against your occupation in their holy cities for oil... Hey, you were in the army, maybe I should blame you for 9/11.
quote:
How would you set up the new government?
I already told you, I don't screw with other peoples cultures/economy/gov't.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 1:48 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 2:38 PM joshua221 has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5698 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 14 of 30 (238625)
08-30-2005 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by joshua221
08-30-2005 1:57 PM


No, they were fighting against your occupation in their holy cities for oil... Hey, you were in the army, maybe I should blame you for 9/11.
Really? What cities were we occupying for oil?
I already told you, I don't screw with other peoples cultures/economy/gov't.
So you aren't interested in debating any points and have no ideas of your own. You just want to whine.
But to answer your original question:
All Iraqi politicians are in office "through USA intervetion."
More specifically, he was named as President of Iraq by the 275 member Iraqi National Assembly.
This message has been edited by Tal, 08-30-2005 02:51 PM

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:57 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 8:50 PM Tal has replied

joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 30 (238683)
08-30-2005 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Tal
08-30-2005 2:38 PM


quote:
But to answer your original question:
All Iraqi politicians are in office "through USA intervetion."
More specifically, he was named as President of Iraq by the 275 member Iraqi National Assembly.
Wow, takes a while with you eh?
I would hate to have another country essentially in control of my homeland. I'm sure you have no problem with that, as long as our occupation doesn't effect you, like most Americans. But these people have suffered through our interventions throughout the world, namely Iraq, Vietnam, Israel help... And the list goes on, you seem to be oblivious to our long history of realism.
quote:
So you aren't interested in debating any points and have no ideas of your own. You just want to whine.
Um, exuse me but aren't you the one with exactly the same views to the majority of America? You are the one with no ideas of your own, and even worse, you ignore historical facts, because they make you feel uncomfortable. Well tell that to the families of those who have died in Iraq defending their country from foriegn and unilateral intervention. You don't even feel for them, step out of your skin for a while, experience the pain that these people feel. You know they are being bombed while us Americans are sitting down watching it all happen on CNN. Bin Laden exploited people's feelings of their human rights being breached by the USA on 9/11. Bin Laden is no hero, but for those that hijacked the planes that day, they can rightly be called freedom fighters. U.S. troops stationed in Saudi Arabia angered Islamic terrorists, claiming that the 2 most important holy cities are occupied, Mecca and Medina. The backing of Israel, supplying weapons, and supporting financially the death of possibly thousands of Palestinians, and the outpost of what they call western imperialism in Jeruselum the 3rd most important city to Islam.
From a website I found when I was at Vassar for a summer scholars group, http://www.islamfortoday.com. Not as biased as the title might tell you.
quote:
In 1953 a CIA coup replaced the democratic government of Muhammad Mossadeq in Iran with a monarchy so that Iran could become a client serving US interests in the Middle East. In Algeria the west financed and legitimized a military coup that prevented Islamists from coming to power after winning an election. In the 1960s, and again in the 1990s Turkey forced Islamists out of power, even after they had won popular mandates, with the tacit support from the U.S. Even now all that American establishment can think of, as an alternate to the Taliban in Afghanistan is the reinstatement of a senile monarch, not the establishment of democracy.
So now what we are involved in, the war on terror, has been started with our actions of greed in the Middle East. You have heard the cliche, "we gave the terrorists the weapons", thats not even half of it.
The death of thousands of Americans on September 11th was inhumane, unIslamic, and horrible. But as Americans, we must see that these attacks were because of our policies in the Middle East, and are easily justifiable by the numbers of deaths that we can be attributed to there.
quote:
Really? What cities were we occupying for oil?
Mecca, Medina. These cities are precious to people who believe in Islam.
From Wikipedia:
quote:
America's presence in Middle-Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia has been one source of discontent that has served as an excuse to Islamic fundamentalists to commit acts of violence. Even as the U.S. downscales its presence and existing bases (e.g. Saudi Arabia), it is not clear that the U.S. presence in Iraq will be anything but de-stabilising because many in the Muslim world resent the "infidel" presence in the Middle East, using this as a means of inciting the disenfranchised in their populations to violence. On the other hand, a stable democracy in Iraq could have a stabilising influence. Clearly, there was a gamble there, and only the post-war period will prove which viewpiont was correct.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 2:38 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Tal, posted 08-30-2005 9:25 PM joshua221 has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024