Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,837 Year: 4,094/9,624 Month: 965/974 Week: 292/286 Day: 13/40 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Oh my how things have changed!!!
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 21 of 125 (347838)
09-09-2006 6:32 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by riVeRraT
09-09-2006 10:11 AM


quote:
Well these days are gone. The woman (both parents) almost has to work now, just so we can survive. That's what pisses me off.I wish I could stay home and raise my kids, and so does my wife.
Well, then, lobby for the ERA.
That way employers would be legally required to pay women equal pay for equal work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by riVeRraT, posted 09-09-2006 10:11 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by kuresu, posted 09-09-2006 7:55 PM nator has not replied
 Message 31 by riVeRraT, posted 09-11-2006 7:07 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 24 of 125 (347850)
09-09-2006 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by GDR
09-09-2006 6:31 PM


Re: Are we better off?
quote:
If a kid had been abducted 50 years ago it would have been all over the papers. It might have taken an additional day to get into them, but it would have been a much bigger story because it was so rare.
Well, I think I'd like to compare some statistics from the 50's and now. Do you have any?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by GDR, posted 09-09-2006 6:31 PM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 09-09-2006 7:54 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 125 (348105)
09-11-2006 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by riVeRraT
09-11-2006 7:06 AM


quote:
Since we decided to insert our "secular" constitution into our Christian morality.
How are Christian marriages affected if gay marriages are recognized by the government?
Nobody is forcing Christians to change their morality.
It is Christians that are forcing their morality onto civil marriage by discriminating against ga marriage.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends! Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!"
- Ned Flanders
"Question with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." - Thomas Jefferson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by riVeRraT, posted 09-11-2006 7:06 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by riVeRraT, posted 09-11-2006 5:59 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 45 of 125 (348319)
09-12-2006 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by 1.61803
09-11-2006 4:57 PM


quote:
Men are superfulous today. Woman lead men in education and college enrollment.
But they are being kept from advancing to the highest levels of power and influence in their professions, including, but not limited to, academia.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by 1.61803, posted 09-11-2006 4:57 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 125 (348321)
09-12-2006 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by riVeRraT
09-11-2006 5:59 PM


I wrote:
How are Christian marriages affected if gay marriages are recognized by the government?
quote:
That has nothing to do with what I said or this thread, stop it.
kuresu wrote:
and that amendment is so much more worthwhile than one on marriage.
since when did we decide we should insert christian morality into a secular constitution?
...to which you replied:
quote:
Since we decided to insert our "secular" constitution into our Christian morality.
I'm sorry if I thought you were responding to kuresu's comment regarding the Christian-led ban on gay marriage, considering that's exactly what you did.
Then I wrote:
Nobody is forcing Christians to change their morality.
quote:
When did I say they were? Also off-topic
You said it here:
quote:
Since we decided to insert our "secular" constitution into our Christian morality.
quote:
Marriage has traditionally been between a man and a woman for a very long time. Change does not come easy. Although I have decided to live and let live, I think others need convincing that people are genetically gay, and deserve the same rights based on something they cannot change about themselves.
It doesn't matter if they are "genetically gay" or not.
quote:
I also wouldn't use the term Christians, and would use the term people. Since we cannot determine what a true Christian is, and that there are Christians who are fine with it, then you have to stop discrimination, and lumoing all Christians into a category, it's called predjudice.
I'll use the word "homophobe".
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by riVeRraT, posted 09-11-2006 5:59 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by riVeRraT, posted 09-12-2006 9:49 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 50 of 125 (349007)
09-14-2006 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by riVeRraT
09-12-2006 9:42 PM


quote:
If they just like being gay, then it's just a choice, and we all know how gay people feel about it being called a choice.
I actually don't know how gay people feel about that.
Do you?
quote:
Plus then we would have to marry everyone based on what they like.
Currently, we allow two consenting heterosexual adults to marry based upon what they like.
What problems do you forsee if we allow any two consenting adults, regardless of gender, to marry?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by riVeRraT, posted 09-12-2006 9:42 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Taz, posted 09-14-2006 12:36 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 51 of 125 (349009)
09-14-2006 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by riVeRraT
09-12-2006 9:49 PM


quote:
Most people are not afraid of gays, they just don't like them, don't agree with it, do not understand it, hate it, etc.
LOL!
People who don't like, don't agree with, do not understand, or hate something do so out of fear, rat.
Fear is at the heart of that entire list.
quote:
Homophobe is another aggresive term used by you, to do nothing more than start trouble between two groups of people. Grow up.
I use the term because it is accurate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by riVeRraT, posted 09-12-2006 9:49 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 7:24 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 54 of 125 (349016)
09-14-2006 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 7:24 AM


Fear is at the heart of that entire list.
quote:
Bullshit.
How so?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 7:24 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 6:36 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 67 of 125 (349155)
09-14-2006 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 6:36 PM


Re: The possible
quote:
Isn't it perfectly possible that someone could not fear gay people, yet not agree with it?
Yes.
But most of the time, I believe, it is fear that is the motivator of anti-homosexual beliefs in people.
Also, you said:
quote:
Most people are not afraid of gays, they just don't like them, don't agree with it, do not understand it, hate it, etc.
Hate is almost always fear-based.
Dislike is almost always fear-based.
If people don't understand others' behavior, they often fear it.
quote:
To be fair, I will note that people do have those things stemming from fear, I amnot saying you are totally wrong, just that you are categorizing people, and name calling with only one piece of evidence. I find that just as disturbing as racism. It stems from the same relm of thinking.
It's not "only one piece of evidence", rat.
The reason Bush and the Republicans won the last election is because many of the people who voted for them were terrified that gay people might be given equal rights to marry the person of their choice in America.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 6:36 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 9:12 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 68 of 125 (349156)
09-14-2006 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 6:52 PM


quote:
I am just as afraid of the current status of marraige, as I am of the unkown status of same sex marraige, and where this is all going to lead us.
I asked the following in a previous message.
What problems do you forsee if we allow any two consenting adults, regardless of gender, to marry?
What are you worried about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 6:52 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 69 of 125 (349158)
09-14-2006 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 7:05 PM


gasby wrote:
Very recently, he has admitted that he could no longer pass such judgement on the issue but would still teach his children that it's wrong. He even went as far as saying that he would not tolerate it if one of his kids is gay.
quote:
Until you start paying my bills around here, then I will continue to teach my kids those things, and why. You make it out to be something wrong, and it's not.
It is wrong to teach your children to be homophobic.
If you have a gay child, they will suffer because you are prejudiced against people of a different sexual preference that you.
You do know that the suicide rate of gay teenagers is quite high, don't you?
quote:
I can raise my kids how ever I choose. Once they are on their own, then they can live however they choose. That's life.
And we can disapprove all we want if you choose to tell us about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 7:05 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 70 of 125 (349159)
09-14-2006 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 7:05 PM


quote:
Ask the pentagon. They have listed homosexuality as a mental disorder. Aren't there cures for disorders?
Why should we listen to the pentagon regarding psychology?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 7:05 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 73 of 125 (349179)
09-14-2006 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by riVeRraT
09-14-2006 9:12 PM


Re: The possible
quote:
Being terrified of gay marrying, and being terrified of gay people are, to me, two different things.
The former is a subset of the latter.
If they weren't homophobic, they wouldn't have a problem with gays marrying.
quote:
If you don't see black as being white, then fear has nothing to do with it.
Thais makes no sense to me.
quote:
Some people feel that gays have as much right to marry as 2 monkeys.
Doesn't mean they are afraid of it.
Of course they fear it.
They fear that heterosexual marriage will somehow be destroyed is gays are permitted to marry.
...just like many people used to (and many still do) fear that the purity of the white race will be diluted if blacks and whites are allowed to marry.
What are you worried about?
quote:
The subtly of the gradual.
This sentence no verb.
Sorry, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
What, specifically, do you think will happen to damage heterosexual marriage if gays are allowed to marry?
quote:
I am not teaching them to be homophobic, I am not predjudice,
Yes, you are, if you teach that you think it is wrong, and that it is going against God. This is similar to how people pass on racism to their children.
Parents don't have to wear white hoods or use the word "nigger" to make it clear to their children that blacks as a group are not good people. Likewise, parents don't have to carry "God Hates Fags" posters at funerals for them to convey the message to their children that being gay is wrong and shameful.
It is certainly your right to teach such things, but I wish you would just be honest and admit that this is what you are doing.
quote:
and the suicide rate of all teenagers is quite high, because parents just don't care enough.
The attempted suicide rate for gay teens is four times higher than that of hetero teens. We don't have a good idea of the completed suicide rate because they don't ask about sexual orientation on the death certificate.
link
Did you know that according to the Center for Disease Control/Massachusetts Department of Education Youth Risk Behavior Survey (1999), 33% of gay youth will attempt suicide? In fact, gay teen suicide attempts are four times that of heterosexual youth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by riVeRraT, posted 09-14-2006 9:12 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-15-2006 9:51 AM nator has replied
 Message 93 by riVeRraT, posted 09-16-2006 7:34 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 74 of 125 (349180)
09-14-2006 9:39 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by riVeRraT
09-11-2006 7:07 AM


Well, then, lobby for the ERA.
That way employers would be legally required to pay women equal pay for equal work.
quote:
How ignorant of you to think I don't.
You do?
What have you done?
quote:
I don't have a problem with anyone getting paid what they deserve.
Good.
Does that mean that you would be willing to take a pay cut?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by riVeRraT, posted 09-11-2006 7:07 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 91 of 125 (349421)
09-15-2006 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by New Cat's Eye
09-15-2006 9:51 AM


Re: The possible
quote:
They don't have to have a fear of people being gay to think that liberalizing marriage will have negetive affects.
True.
But I think that denying people equal rights because something bad might happen is unacceptable in our secular constitutional democracy.
And I've really never been able to get anybody to elaborate upon what those "negative effects" will be.
quote:
I think its more of a worry about marriage, in general, which I guess is heterosexual, in general, but its not neccessarily about the heterosexual part specifically.
OK, so do you think they are they afraid that hetero marrige will be destroyed or not, because your statement is very murky.
quote:
I think he means that the liberal changes to marriage are gradual and the results are subtle. These are changes that I would prefer to not be made, too.
WHAT changes?
Be specific.
quote:
I think its the fear of change, or the desire for conservation that is at the heart of it, not a hate of gay people.
What it does in practice, though, is deny equal rights to homosexuals.
quote:
I don't see why specific damages need to be listed, especially when some of them might not be able to be foreseen. Its more of a conservative vs liberal approach, IMHO.
If you say "it will be bad if gays marry" am I just supposed to say "Oh, well, if you say it's going to be bad, then it must be true."?
If you make the claim that allowing gays to marry will result in bad things, you should be able to elaborate upon what those bad things are if you want anyone to believe you.
Otherwise, you're just Chicken Little.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-15-2006 9:51 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by New Cat's Eye, posted 09-18-2006 1:24 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024