Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Terri Schiavo and the separation of powers
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 48 (193253)
03-22-2005 7:07 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Silent H
03-21-2005 3:03 PM


Re: Bush rushes to save a life!
quote:
If it is really true that Bush signed a law allowing hospitals to unhook patients over the wishes of relatives, in order to save money, why is no one hammering on this in the media?
Because your media is compliant and toothless, and merely reports government statements rather than questioning them.
quote:
This would be a great way to stick it to Bush.
And why would they want to do that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Silent H, posted 03-21-2005 3:03 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Silent H, posted 03-22-2005 8:06 AM contracycle has replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 48 (193622)
03-23-2005 5:26 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Silent H
03-22-2005 8:06 AM


Re: Bush rushes to save a life!
quote:
Contra, why on earth are you trying to start an argument?
Why do you construe a direct answer to your question as a desire to start an argument?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Silent H, posted 03-22-2005 8:06 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Silent H, posted 03-23-2005 5:50 AM contracycle has replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 48 (193636)
03-23-2005 7:16 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Silent H
03-23-2005 5:50 AM


Re: Bush rushes to save a life!
quote:
Because it was not a direct answer, it was simply a slam job.
No, it was a direct answer.
quote:
Have you been seeing this getting broadcast in England or any other Euro news?
Not specifically, probably because Bush cannot be any further discredited.
This sort of proposition does have cogent arguments in its favour, of the accounting variety. The answer to the question as to why this was not used to attack Bush is that US media has no interest in doing so. They do not question, they merely report.
quote:
Instead of finding an excuse to inject diatribe, why not come up with a serious answer, especially when you feel compelled to answer a rhetorical question?
Why don't you accept an honest answer when you get one?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Silent H, posted 03-23-2005 5:50 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Silent H, posted 03-23-2005 7:32 AM contracycle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024