Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 0/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On feeling sorry for people
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 271 of 300 (342949)
08-24-2006 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by jar
08-24-2006 10:26 AM


Re: Question for Jar
In that quote from you you pull the same stunt. What did my "pictures of birds and flowers" have to do with morality?
That's not what I said nor what I meant. Your pictures of birds and flowers had nothing to do with morality and neither did my description of the Veterans.
The responses of other posters to my description turned it into a moral matter. Your response was mild compared to some of them. If you look at the OP, you will see that I referred to those reactions that called my feeling "dehumanizing" to the Vets. That's particularly what I was responding to.
When we got to this new thread, you responded to it less mildly, but perhaps you were just irritated that I brought the subject up again. Since you responded, I responded to you, although you were not one of the posters whose comments were extreme.
So it was not a moral matter with me originally--neither your pictures nor my description of the Vets.
But my overall point was to suggest that this negative reaction for my feeling sorry for the vets was a PC concept. Creavolution, I think, agreed that it was a PERVERSION of a PC concept.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 10:26 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 11:16 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 272 of 300 (342950)
08-24-2006 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 270 by jar
08-24-2006 10:40 AM


Re: still playing games.
You still seem to be playing games robin. You provide a quote, do not tell us who said it and provide no link back to the original so that we can see it is context and relation to earlier posts. You don't even bother to tell us which thread it was from or the message number.
Discreet Lebel, #260, "Boasts of Atheists."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 10:40 AM jar has not replied

NeuroCycle
Inactive Member


Message 273 of 300 (342952)
08-24-2006 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 261 by jar
08-23-2006 8:28 PM


Re: Question for Jar
You just plain missed an golden opportunity. That's all, You blew a chance. Whether it is moral or not has nothing to do with it just as my not eating pudding is neither moral or immoral.
My version
and eating pudding can't be moral or immoral so that is a bad example.[AbE]nevermind the last bit there
Edited by NeuroCycle, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by jar, posted 08-23-2006 8:28 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 11:09 AM NeuroCycle has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 274 of 300 (342953)
08-24-2006 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 273 by NeuroCycle
08-24-2006 11:07 AM


Re: Question for Jar
'scuse me?
I've been saying all along that robins example was not a morality tale.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-24-2006 11:07 AM NeuroCycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-24-2006 11:15 AM jar has not replied

NeuroCycle
Inactive Member


Message 275 of 300 (342954)
08-24-2006 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 274 by jar
08-24-2006 11:09 AM


Re: Question for Jar
I editted my post above before I saw your reply
Edited by NeuroCycle, : expansion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 11:09 AM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 276 of 300 (342955)
08-24-2006 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 271 by robinrohan
08-24-2006 10:56 AM


Re: Question for Jar
I'm just a poor little petunia
in an onion patch.
An onion patch,
an onion patch.
I'm just a poor little petunia
in an onion patch,
and nobody plays with me?
If you like I will also sing "In San Francisco Bay" for you too.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 271 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 10:56 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 12:07 PM jar has replied

Tusko
Member (Idle past 123 days)
Posts: 615
From: London, UK
Joined: 10-01-2004


Message 277 of 300 (342964)
08-24-2006 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by ringo
08-23-2006 3:44 PM


Its weird - I get the feeling we're just talking at cross porpoises. I feel a bit silly. It feels like you really don't think my point of view is reasonable, and so I'm prompted to write lengthier and lengthier defences of it. To be honest, I don't really care that much about the issue - I just want to see if I can get some acknowledgment, somehow. One last go!
I think I see your point of view. Is it best crystalised thus?
Ringo writes:
"there's a fellow human being. The natural thing to do is acknowledge his existence."
That seems perfectly reasonable. I do that most of the time. ( I happen to be one of those people who really likes getting strangers to smile back at them on the bus by smiling at them.) Of course, there are times when I don't do this. I might be in a bad mood. I might be in a hurry. For other people, they might be inhibited by any nomber of factors, either short- or long-term.
Ringo writes:
(I'm baffled by how defensive you guys are about that.)
Maybe you come from a small town - but I don't believe that you are physically capable of acknowledging every human you come near. Sometimes this isn't possible, or desirable, or appropriate. There are all kinds of circumstances that might prevent you from tipping your ten gallon hat to a passer-by. There are so many.
I'm imagining that you see your position as common sense, humane etc.. etc.. But I was prompted to write because it seemed like everyone was being uneccessarily hard on Robin. To pass a judgement on him, as some people seemed to, or even with a shake of a metaphorical head to say "you have perhaps missed out on a wonderful conversation" seemed to be a little presumptuous. That's all - that's my only point! I think its presumptuous because there could be any number of reasons that prevented him from talking. We weren't there: we don't know.
Notice - he didn't say "when I see old veterans from wars, I pity them." He was instead refering to a specific situation and the feelings he felt at that time. It would be pretty offensive to sweepingly dismiss all vets as objects of pity out of hand. But he didn't do that.
Even if you want to, sometimes you can't speak to the people that break your heart to look at - but I was really suprised that when he offered this moment up he got the reception he did. Like I said, we don't know what meant that he didn't speak at this time - but to assume that the failure to speak/smile/whatever indicates some kind of character flaw seems weird [italic]when none of us are able to be like this 100% of the time[/italic]
I was asking for evidence not to try to undermine your argument necessarily, but because I'm having real trouble understanding your position and I need help.
Whoops! Got to go. Cheers, hope you are doing okay today. I can't wait to get out of work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by ringo, posted 08-23-2006 3:44 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by ringo, posted 08-24-2006 12:13 PM Tusko has not replied
 Message 284 by ReverendDG, posted 08-25-2006 1:11 AM Tusko has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 278 of 300 (342973)
08-24-2006 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by jar
08-24-2006 11:16 AM


Re: Question for Jar
I'm just a poor little petunia
in an onion patch.
An onion patch,
an onion patch.
I'm just a poor little petunia
in an onion patch,
and nobody plays with me?
If you like I will also sing "In San Francisco Bay" for you too.
What is this supposed to mean?
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 11:16 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 12:09 PM robinrohan has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 279 of 300 (342974)
08-24-2006 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 278 by robinrohan
08-24-2006 12:07 PM


Re: Question for Jar
Gee, I thought it was perfectly clear. I will be happy to sing another song for you if you wish.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 278 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 12:07 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 280 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 12:13 PM jar has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 280 of 300 (342975)
08-24-2006 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by jar
08-24-2006 12:09 PM


Re: Question for Jar
Gee, I thought it was perfectly clear. I will be happy to sing another song for you if you wish.
It might be better if you just tell me what the song was supposed to mean. I'm not musically minded.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 12:09 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 282 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 12:31 PM robinrohan has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 281 of 300 (342976)
08-24-2006 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by Tusko
08-24-2006 11:45 AM


Tusko writes:
Maybe you come from a small town - but I don't believe that you are physically capable of acknowledging every human you come near.
But I am quite capable of acknowledging all of them.
Every person I pass on the street, I look them in the eye. (Women in particular like being looked in the eye rather than the chest.)
They don't all make eye contact. Some of them avoid it. Many of them don't react at all. Some smile, some say "Hi." Some return my smile, some return my "Hi."
On rare occaisions, we both stop and have a conversation.
It sounds to me that you're doing exactly the same thing, but you seem to feel the need to diminish the value of those "baby steps".
To pass a judgement on him, as some people seemed to, or even with a shake of a metaphorical head to say "you have perhaps missed out on a wonderful conversation" seemed to be a little presumptuous... because there could be any number of reasons that prevented him from talking.
If it's presumptuous, it's presumptuous. Boo hoo. Don't waste posts on it.
to assume that the failure to speak/smile/whatever indicates some kind of character flaw seems weird....
I wish you would point out where I said anything about "character flaws".
Read my lips: I said he missed an oppurtunity. That's all.
I'll say again: I don't know why all the shrinking violets are getting into such a snit about it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Tusko, posted 08-24-2006 11:45 AM Tusko has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 282 of 300 (342983)
08-24-2006 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 280 by robinrohan
08-24-2006 12:13 PM


Re: Question for Jar
Nah, folk learn best by working things out for themselves. I will not diminish you or the pleasure you will get from figuring it out on your own.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 280 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 12:13 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 283 by robinrohan, posted 08-24-2006 12:41 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 283 of 300 (342985)
08-24-2006 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 282 by jar
08-24-2006 12:31 PM


Re: Question for Jar
Nah, folk learn best by working things out for themselves. I will not diminish you or the pleasure you will get from figuring it out on your own.
This strikes me as mere petty rudeness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 282 by jar, posted 08-24-2006 12:31 PM jar has not replied

ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4132 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 284 of 300 (343180)
08-25-2006 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 277 by Tusko
08-24-2006 11:45 AM


Its weird - I get the feeling we're just talking at cross porpoises
is that when dolphins sonar messes up and they crash into each other?
*squeek* *squeek*
sorry couldn't resist
Edited by ReverendDG, : No reason given.
Edited by ReverendDG, : darn quotes

FAITH, n.
Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel. - the devil's dictonary

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Tusko, posted 08-24-2006 11:45 AM Tusko has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 285 by ringo, posted 08-25-2006 1:53 AM ReverendDG has not replied
 Message 286 by Tusko, posted 08-25-2006 9:54 AM ReverendDG has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 285 of 300 (343196)
08-25-2006 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 284 by ReverendDG
08-25-2006 1:11 AM


quoting Tusko, ReverendDG writes:
... we're just talking at cross porpoises
I can't believe I missed that.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 284 by ReverendDG, posted 08-25-2006 1:11 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024