Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Haggard Scandal
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 151 of 302 (361661)
11-04-2006 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Archer Opteryx
11-04-2006 9:45 AM


Re: a study in contrasts
You are a god, archer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-04-2006 9:45 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-05-2006 12:11 AM nator has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 152 of 302 (361662)
11-04-2006 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by MangyTiger
11-04-2006 8:25 PM


Re: How messed up are they?
It's almost like they are drawn to fight against something they recognise is within themselves.
Are you saying that human beings should obey their desires and not try to control them?
It's an interesting idea really. Let's just be who we really are! Is that how we determine what is real?

"God must know, better than anyone, how unfulfilling it is to be right, until it can be shared, with a community willing to accept it, and enjoy the glory of it."(Rob Lockett)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by MangyTiger, posted 11-04-2006 8:25 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 153 of 302 (361664)
11-04-2006 8:57 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Archer Opteryx
11-04-2006 9:45 AM


Re: a study in contrasts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Billy Graham was once cornered by a tenatious reporter who asked him his thoughts on the Jim Baker scandal... It was imparted to me that Billy does not like to participate in such discourse as this. But the reporter had him pinned.
He responded, (and I paraphrase) "There are thousands of airplanes, some big, some small. They fly thousands of miles and perform all kinds of functions flawlessly, some mundane, others grand... But let one grand jumbo jet crash, and the whole world is gawking at the casualties."

"God must know, better than anyone, how unfulfilling it is to be right, until it can be shared, with a community willing to accept it, and enjoy the glory of it."(Rob Lockett)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-04-2006 9:45 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-04-2006 11:48 PM Rob has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 154 of 302 (361667)
11-04-2006 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Hyroglyphx
11-04-2006 10:34 AM


Re: Drugs
The thing is, I'm not judging you by MY moral standards, but by that of the Religious Right's.
quote:
I don't really know what the Religious Right means. I assume it to mean those like Falwell who politicize their religion. I would say, who cares what they say.
And Dobson, and Robertson, and the like.
Who cares what they say? Millions of Americans, President Bush, and Carl Rove, and the NeoCon Leadership, that's who.
You lot are the ones telling me and my gay friends how we should live according to your own moral standards as put forth by your religious and political leaders, enforced by law if possible.
quote:
Shraf, give me a break. I don't tell you "turn or burn, you and your homo friends!"
So, you're a vocal opponent of any of the religious social conservatives who are in power, and always vote against them when they propose passing laws restricting activities which go against their and your religious convictions?
Somehow, I don't think you voted for Gore last time.
quote:
All that you and I have ever done is have discussions about our personal beliefs. My beliefs include what Yahweh says. Aside from arguing my points about theology and philosophy, I don't think I've done anything so egregious to where I'm demanding that you believe what I believe.
I know you can't demand that I believe what you do, but you can support people who would pass laws to force me to live according to your rules.
If you voted for the NeoCons it means that you support the passing of laws that would restrict others' ability to live their lives in the way they see fit on the basis of your personal religious beliefs.
Look, you can gush all you want in the public square about your past, but I'm not going to join in, thanks.
quote:
If you aren't comfortable sharing that much information with almost perfect strangers, that's fine. It does offer a catharsis though.
Sharing it with strangers would not be cathartic for me.
Sharing it with a close friend or family member would be, though.
quote:
Also, if you think that people are going to use that against you some time down the line, I can assure you that I would never do that to you.
I'm not worried about that. There are just limits upon what I will put on this internet forum, which is a completely public place that can be viewed by anyone with a computer and an internet connection.
quote:
I can't speak for everyone else, but that is off-limits for me. I would be too honored that you shared something so personal. Betrayal of that confidence would be unacceptable for me.
That's very good of you, thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:34 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:26 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 155 of 302 (361669)
11-04-2006 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by jar
11-04-2006 10:55 AM


Re: nemesis_juggernaut's moral standard refuted by Haggard ... et al
quote:
Meth is illegal, even in Denver.
So is prostitution. In Denver.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by jar, posted 11-04-2006 10:55 AM jar has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 156 of 302 (361673)
11-04-2006 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 150 by MangyTiger
11-04-2006 8:25 PM


Re: How messed up are they?
quote:
It's almost like they are drawn to fight against something they recognise is within themselves. You almost wonder if they think that if they can 'destroy' homosexuality in the wider world it will solve their internal problems. Some psychiatrist should write a book about it.
It's called "projection".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by MangyTiger, posted 11-04-2006 8:25 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 157 of 302 (361676)
11-04-2006 9:41 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by MangyTiger
11-04-2006 6:40 PM


Yeah it's mostly the name that conjures Irishman, but there was also that he reminded me of an enormous Leprechaun beaming down at me when we met. The facial features. I don't know how tall he was but he must have been quite tall. Of course I might have been stoned myself, having an Alice moment.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by MangyTiger, posted 11-04-2006 6:40 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 158 of 302 (361689)
11-04-2006 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by nator
11-03-2006 7:23 PM


The thing that made me sick
Schrafinator writes:
why did Rev Haggerd "confess" only when he was forced to?
Why do these "confessions" only come out when they are caught, not before?
  • I was not surprised by the fact that Ted Haggard may have had gay sex and paid for it.
  • I was not surprised that Ted Haggard bought meth and that he probably used it.
    What sickened me and continues to hurt me is the fact that this leader of a church of 15,000 can't even tell the truth about it all.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 15 by nator, posted 11-03-2006 7:23 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 199 by nator, posted 11-05-2006 6:28 AM Phat has not replied

    Hyroglyphx
    Inactive Member


    Message 159 of 302 (361692)
    11-04-2006 10:26 PM
    Reply to: Message 154 by nator
    11-04-2006 9:06 PM


    Re: Drugs
    And Dobson, and Robertson, and the like.
    I can see how Robertson fits in that criteria, but I've never really understood why Dobson is so despised by the irreligious.
    Who cares what they say? Millions of Americans, President Bush, and Carl Rove, and the NeoCon Leadership, that's who.
    And to think, they should be listening to the tirades of Michael Moore.
    So, you're a vocal opponent of any of the religious social conservatives who are in power, and always vote against them when they propose passing laws restricting activities which go against their and your religious convictions?
    I vote for who I think will perform the best job and a sound ethical standard. All that I said was I have objections to politicizing Jesus. I don;t how that turned into what you described.
    Somehow, I don't think you voted for Gore last time.
    Kerry was last one. I voted for neither. But I did have the fortune of meeting John Kerry and telling him that he and his running mate had better hair than his opposition. He was visibly irritated and walked away from me to shake the hands of his supporters.
    I know you can't demand that I believe what you do, but you can support people who would pass laws to force me to live according to your rules.
    Nothing forces you to live as I do. But if that really were the case, wouldn't that imposition be the same for me?
    If you voted for the NeoCons it means that you support the passing of laws that would restrict others' ability to live their lives in the way they see fit on the basis of your personal religious beliefs.
    I see it as them trying to pass laws that protect its citizens. Even the most liberal of Democrats wants that. We just differ in our opinion of what we best support and defend its citizens.
    Sharing it with strangers would not be cathartic for me. Sharing it with a close friend or family member would be, though.
    Fair enough.
    quote:
    I can't speak for everyone else, but that is off-limits for me. I would be too honored that you shared something so personal. Betrayal of that confidence would be unacceptable for me.
    That's very good of you, thanks.
    Not a problem.

    "The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2nd Corinthians 10:4-5

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 154 by nator, posted 11-04-2006 9:06 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 160 by jar, posted 11-04-2006 10:29 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
     Message 200 by nator, posted 11-05-2006 6:49 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
     Message 275 by RAZD, posted 11-05-2006 7:26 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

    jar
    Member (Idle past 415 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 160 of 302 (361695)
    11-04-2006 10:29 PM
    Reply to: Message 159 by Hyroglyphx
    11-04-2006 10:26 PM


    Re: Drugs
    I can see how Robertson fits in that criteria, but I've never really understood why Dobson is so despised by the irreligious.
    Dobson is a joke to the religious as well. He is an embarrassment to Christianity.

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 159 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:26 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 161 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:33 PM jar has replied

    Hyroglyphx
    Inactive Member


    Message 161 of 302 (361697)
    11-04-2006 10:33 PM
    Reply to: Message 160 by jar
    11-04-2006 10:29 PM


    Re: Drugs
    Dobson is a joke to the religious as well. He is an embarrassment to Christianity.
    Okay, but why do you think so? What does he do that's so awful?

    "The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2nd Corinthians 10:4-5

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 160 by jar, posted 11-04-2006 10:29 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 163 by jar, posted 11-04-2006 10:42 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

    ringo
    Member (Idle past 433 days)
    Posts: 20940
    From: frozen wasteland
    Joined: 03-23-2005


    Message 162 of 302 (361698)
    11-04-2006 10:34 PM
    Reply to: Message 147 by Rob
    11-04-2006 7:46 PM


    Rob writes:
    ... the laws of morality demonstrate how the universe works in terms of relationships.
    There are no "laws of morality".
    A lot of this stuff isn't found by thinking so much as you think Ringo. Thinking is what enables us to deny certain 'real' stuff (like morality) with more and more magical manuevering.
    You have it backwards. It's your "magical maneuvering" that enables you to avoid thinking.

    Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
    Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 147 by Rob, posted 11-04-2006 7:46 PM Rob has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 164 by Rob, posted 11-04-2006 11:46 PM ringo has replied

    jar
    Member (Idle past 415 days)
    Posts: 34026
    From: Texas!!
    Joined: 04-20-2004


    Message 163 of 302 (361700)
    11-04-2006 10:42 PM
    Reply to: Message 161 by Hyroglyphx
    11-04-2006 10:33 PM


    Mainly just a bigot
    Focus on the Family. A most frightening organization.

    Aslan is not a Tame Lion

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 161 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:33 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 183 by iceage, posted 11-05-2006 1:39 AM jar has replied

    Rob 
    Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
    Posts: 2297
    Joined: 06-01-2006


    Message 164 of 302 (361705)
    11-04-2006 11:46 PM
    Reply to: Message 162 by ringo
    11-04-2006 10:34 PM


    There are no "laws of morality".
    Disclaimer: I only offer the following, as a means of explaining something irrefutable. I am also not attempting to insult your intelligence. Furthermore, it is not an attempt by me to be right. I cannot be right. Neither can you. This argument is not just mine; it is yours also. It is the basis of all 'logic'; The law of non-contradiction. It is right, and we both use it. It holds that a contradictory statement cannot be true (unless it is qualified in some manner). You just used the law of non-contradiction by making an affirmation. The only reason yours failed, was because of the attempt to affirm a negative.
    Other absolute negations include:
    1. There is no truth.
    2. There is no God.
    3. There are no blue stones with black dots in the universe.
    To make the point clearer... you are positing an absolute, while denying that absolutes exist. As such, I must ask a very important question:
    Is it wrong for me to say that there are laws of morality? And I mean for everybody...
    Please answer carefully...
    You have it backwards. It's your "magical maneuvering" that enables you to avoid thinking
    If you are right, then you prove the law of non-contradiction by inferring that I am wrong and you are right. That is the law of non-contradiction. We cannot both be right!
    But you are not right, because you are using the law of non-contradiction against itself, and that is pure nonsense.
    A house divided against itself cannot stand! It rests on sand.
    But a house built on the rock, can endure the storm.
    Thinking is very shallow and simple. It is basic, and base. It is academic. It is careful. It is sound.
    And it is despised... because the devil is in the details, and he cannot hide from those who can see. God didn't make fig leaves big enough to drown out the light of reason.
    "In coming to understand anything we are rejecting the facts as they are for us, in favour of the facts as they are."
    (Lewis of course)
    Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

    "God must know, better than anyone, how unfulfilling it is to be right, until it can be shared, with a community willing to accept it, and enjoy the glory of it."(Rob Lockett)

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 162 by ringo, posted 11-04-2006 10:34 PM ringo has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 167 by ringo, posted 11-05-2006 12:10 AM Rob has replied

    Archer Opteryx
    Member (Idle past 3619 days)
    Posts: 1811
    From: East Asia
    Joined: 08-16-2006


    Message 165 of 302 (361706)
    11-04-2006 11:48 PM
    Reply to: Message 153 by Rob
    11-04-2006 8:57 PM


    Fly the Fundie Skies
    [Billy Graham] responded, (and I paraphrase) "There are thousands of airplanes, some big, some small. They fly thousands of miles and perform all kinds of functions flawlessly, some mundane, others grand... But let one grand jumbo jet crash, and the whole world is gawking at the casualties."
    Interesting analogy.
    What we have, though, is more like ten jets crashing---all operated by the same airline. The airline has been reprimanded frequently by the FAA for hiring unqualified personnel, using substandard equipment and ignoring even the most basic safety standards. The airline's ads routinely make extravagant claims but is has always been plagued by lawsuits and audits and its shares occupy the cellar on the stock market. The planes themselves are known to have abyssmal safety records. Each downed jet was shown after its accident to have been held together with spit and Scotch tape. Yet airline executives repeatedly sidestep questions and have yet to make any changes.
    People do ask questions after accidents like these. Why? Because investigations are proper in such situations. The priority is not revenge or morbid curiosity. The issue is how innocent people may be protected from abuse and exploitation by those charged with ensuring their safety.
    Airline execs like Mr Graham dislike being summoned as part of the inquiry. But to avoid the subject is a criminal act of neglect when the airline, as he noted, daily puts more passengers in the air.
    ______
    Edited by Archer Opterix, : HTML.
    Edited by Archer Opterix, : Typo.
    Edited by Archer Opterix, : Typo.

    Archer
    All species are transitional.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 153 by Rob, posted 11-04-2006 8:57 PM Rob has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 166 by Rob, posted 11-05-2006 12:01 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied
     Message 168 by Rob, posted 11-05-2006 12:11 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024