Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,484 Year: 3,741/9,624 Month: 612/974 Week: 225/276 Day: 1/64 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Howard Dean was right!
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 106 of 190 (216765)
06-14-2005 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by berberry
06-14-2005 7:47 AM


quote:
The thing that gets me is that so many republicans are full of advice about how the democrats can reclaim the White House and Congress. The advice always seems to include the admonition to "keep your mouths shut". As I mentioned earlier, the democrats are NOT losing elections because they won't keep their mouths shut.
Exactly.
The fact that Dean is getting under the skin of many Republicans is, in my mind, a very good sign.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 7:47 AM berberry has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 107 of 190 (216770)
06-14-2005 8:49 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by berberry
06-14-2005 7:47 AM


Democrats are not going to regain any power by presenting themselves as republican-lite. They'd be fools to try to go after part of the republican vote rather than trying to energize their liberal base. We need more, much more, of what Howard Dean is doing.
Ok then we agree, Howard's rhetoric is a good plan, he should keep talking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 7:47 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 9:05 AM Monk has replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 108 of 190 (216771)
06-14-2005 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by nator
06-14-2005 8:18 AM


It's because he's part of the TEAM, holmes!
If I'm part of a TEAM, then you are part of the opposition TEAM.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by nator, posted 06-14-2005 8:18 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by nator, posted 06-14-2005 2:47 PM Monk has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 109 of 190 (216773)
06-14-2005 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Monk
06-14-2005 8:49 AM


Monk writes me:
quote:
Ok then we agree, Howard's rhetoric is a good plan, he should keep talking.
Finally! Took you long enough.

"I think younger workers first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." George W. Bush, May 4, 2005

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 8:49 AM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 9:12 AM berberry has replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 110 of 190 (216775)
06-14-2005 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by berberry
06-14-2005 9:05 AM


Finally! Took you long enough.
What are you talking about? I've been consistant throughout this thread. Howard should keep talking, it's good for Republicans.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 9:05 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 9:15 AM Monk has not replied
 Message 112 by Silent H, posted 06-14-2005 11:30 AM Monk has not replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 190 (216776)
06-14-2005 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by Monk
06-14-2005 9:12 AM


Monk writes me:
quote:
...it's good for Republicans.
If you say so.

"I think younger workers first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." George W. Bush, May 4, 2005

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 9:12 AM Monk has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 112 of 190 (216792)
06-14-2005 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by Monk
06-14-2005 9:12 AM


Howard should keep talking, it's good for Republicans.
By which logic I can take it that the Republicans are supporting Bolton because he's good for Al Queda. At least now we know what side Reps are on.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 9:12 AM Monk has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Tal, posted 06-14-2005 11:49 AM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 113 of 190 (216793)
06-14-2005 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by berberry
06-14-2005 7:47 AM


The thing that gets me is that so many republicans are full of advice about how the democrats can reclaim the White House and Congress.
Yeah, that's really one of the more intellectually insulting parts of this whole debate.
Whatever they say Dems should do is pointless, they'd never vote for a Dem because they are purely partisan and have no principles. You could run a Jefferson/Washington Dem ticket with Lincoln as the head of the DNC and Reps would be hooting and howling about how stupid and unamerican they are, while voting for some neocon.
Democrats are not going to regain any power by presenting themselves as republican-lite. They'd be fools to try to go after part of the republican vote rather than trying to energize their liberal base. We need more, much more, of what Howard Dean is doing.
Agreed, of course not in the way Monk is meaning it.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by berberry, posted 06-14-2005 7:47 AM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 12:10 PM Silent H has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5699 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 114 of 190 (216797)
06-14-2005 11:49 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by Silent H
06-14-2005 11:30 AM


By which logic I can take it that the Republicans are supporting Bolton because he's good for Al Queda. At least now we know what side Reps are on.
That comparison makes about as much sense as a football bat.
Republicans like Dean because he speaks what democrats think. Most democrats won't voice what they think because if they do, they know they will lose elections (much as they have been). Democrats simply haven't been honest about who they are. Dean is. And we appreciate him for that.
He may appeal to the really far lefties with his statements, but the average person is finally getting to see what Dems are all about. They can't compete in the arena of ideas, and Dean amplifies that.
How does that compare to the Republicans and Bolton?

"A good plan executed today is better than a perfect plan executed at some indefinite point in the future."
- General George Patton Jr
No webpage found at provided URL: www.1st-vets.us

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Silent H, posted 06-14-2005 11:30 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Silent H, posted 06-14-2005 2:00 PM Tal has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 115 of 190 (216800)
06-14-2005 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Silent H
06-14-2005 11:36 AM


Holmes writes:
Whatever they say Dems should do is pointless, they'd never vote for a Dem because they are purely partisan and have no principles. You could run a Jefferson/Washington Dem ticket with Lincoln as the head of the DNC and Reps would be hooting and howling about how stupid and unamerican they are, while voting for some neocon.
Whatever they say Reps should do is pointless, they'd never vote for a Rep because they are purely partisan and have no principles. You could run a JFK/Hillary Rep ticket with Teddy Kennedy as the head of the RNC and Dems would be hooting and howling about how stupid and unamerican they are, while voting for some socialist liberal.
This message has been edited by Monk, Tue, 06-14-2005 12:36 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Silent H, posted 06-14-2005 11:36 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Chiroptera, posted 06-14-2005 1:26 PM Monk has replied
 Message 119 by Silent H, posted 06-14-2005 2:12 PM Monk has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 190 (216810)
06-14-2005 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Monk
06-14-2005 12:10 PM


Are you implying that JFK/Hillary/Ted Kennedy are on the same level as Jefferson/Washington/Lincoln? Or are you seriously implying that Democrats think that JFK/Hillary/Ted Kennedy are on the same level as Jefferson/Washington/Lincoln?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 12:10 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 1:37 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3946 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 117 of 190 (216813)
06-14-2005 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by Chiroptera
06-14-2005 1:26 PM


No

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Chiroptera, posted 06-14-2005 1:26 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 118 of 190 (216815)
06-14-2005 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Tal
06-14-2005 11:49 AM


How does that compare to the Republicans and Bolton?
I thought I made this clear, but perhaps it was too complex. Lets try it again.
Monk was stating that Reps like him are for Dean because his statements will not appeal to Reps (for whatever reason) and so lose support for the Dems.
I was making a connection between Dean and Bolton because their hyperbolic commentary is the same. I would guess that it could be said that Bolton says what Reps think but are afraid to say, because if they do there'd be international outrage and lose world support (much as they have been doing).
Republicans simply haven't been honest about who they are. Bolton is.
The difference is that while Reps will say this is true for Dean... his hyperbole will affect the standing or gaining support for a cause... they argue the opposite in the case of Bolton saying his hyperbolic commentary can do no such thing.
There is also a difference in that the Dems do not believe the US should be portrayed as believing what Bolton and neocons believe. Thus they are extra shocked that he;d be considered because they don't want to see the US weakened any further, and thus aid our enemies.
I might also add that even nonDems (like myself) can see that same issue in Bolton. I have already agreed with Monk's general position that Dean's commentary can't help the Dems win support from Reps. The problem is you and he can't stay consistent and approach the Bolton issue with the same reasoning.
Hyperbolic commentary is either useful or its not. Make up your mind.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Tal, posted 06-14-2005 11:49 AM Tal has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 119 of 190 (216816)
06-14-2005 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Monk
06-14-2005 12:10 PM


Whatever they say Reps should do is pointless, they'd never vote for a Rep because they are purely partisan and have no principles.
For some that may be true, but the 04 election showed that it is certainly true for most Reps.
There is no way Bush should have been victorious if the members of the Republican party voted along traditional Republican principles... and that means stated by Reps as their "traditional principles" as late as the 2000 election.
From an outsiders perspective it was quite illuminating, even if depressing. I loathed the Dem candidate in 2000 and was more or less supportive (certainly more than Gore) of Bush do to much of his stated platform. The same man ran in 2004 but with a diametrically opposed platform and (what's worse) job performance.
There were a few Reps who admitted this and left the party. Most however, like McCain, cried like a bitch, then shut up to rally around the Republican Party (planning a fight over what principles would reign AFTER the election).
I mean what was it, a month, maybe two after the election that McCain returned to criticizing policy and stating that most Reps had left the party's principles behind? If only that guy had a real pair of balls DURING the election.
Reps have criticized Dems for playing partisan politics for a very long time, but recent history has showed it up to be mass projection. Sure many Dems are partisan, but not as bad as the Reps.
That's from an OUTSIDER'S perspective who dislikes both sides. I'm still hoping for a turnaround within the Rep party, and a return to principles.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 12:10 PM Monk has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 120 of 190 (216822)
06-14-2005 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Monk
06-14-2005 8:52 AM


quote:
If I'm part of a TEAM, then you are part of the opposition TEAM.
No, there's a big difference between you and me.
I am an equal opportunity criticizer.
I have publically criticized Clinton, I criticized Kerry, I criticized stupid Democrats and Democratic and liberal programs and have for years. I see through spin, I read and listen to conservative sources of info, I try to get a broad spectrum of news sources.
You, on the other hand, seem to support Republicans no matter what they do, even when they completely reject traditional conservative values.
That's why I asked you to list 10 Republican policies or elected officials you are critical of.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 8:52 AM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Jazzns, posted 06-14-2005 3:08 PM nator has not replied
 Message 122 by Jazzns, posted 06-14-2005 3:20 PM nator has not replied
 Message 123 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 3:24 PM nator has not replied
 Message 127 by Monk, posted 06-14-2005 11:05 PM nator has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024