Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,844 Year: 4,101/9,624 Month: 972/974 Week: 299/286 Day: 20/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The boasts of atheists (Atheist self-deception)
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 96 of 304 (330408)
07-10-2006 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by robinrohan
07-10-2006 1:24 PM


There is a tendency among non-believers, in their eagerness to prove to believers that one can be very happy, fulfilled, and of high moral character without any religious belief, to exaggerate their qualities and the qualities of their experiences--thus the boasting.
I agree with you that there is a desire among some atheists to prove happiness, fulfillment, etc. I'm sure I'm guilty of this myself. Yet, how can you possibly know that these people you speak of are exaggerating?
Ned in another thread spoke approvingly of a "healthy ego," but I do not find a sentimental view of oneself and of life to be healthy. I think it very unhealthy.
So what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 1:24 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 1:57 PM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 112 of 304 (330462)
07-10-2006 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by robinrohan
07-10-2006 2:42 PM


Constant robust enthusiasm for the wonder of life is more than human.
Did anyone actually claim a constant robust enthusiasm of life? What I've seen is a, "I'm happier about life more often than not," kind-of boast.
Exemplary moral character is more than human, unless you're some kind of saint.
Here you are confusing because this means either human saints are more than human or that exemplary moral character is not more than human since human saints can exhibit such behavior, rare as it may be.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 2:42 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 3:04 PM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 131 of 304 (330510)
07-10-2006 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by robinrohan
07-10-2006 4:09 PM


Re: Really? It is?
Oh, ok. I have lived many years in this world, and I have never known anyone with an exemplary moral character. They all had flaws, many of them serious.
But maybe I ran with the wrong crowd.
Maybe you're too high up on your own moral pedestal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 4:09 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 4:34 PM docpotato has replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 142 of 304 (330551)
07-10-2006 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by robinrohan
07-10-2006 4:34 PM


Re: Really? It is?
Maybe so. It's hard to know oneself.
Agreed.
But I don't think I'm on a moral pedestal here, unless being annoyed by boasts is being on a moral pedestal.
I dunno. Probably not. This seems to be a case where you're disgusted by what you perceive to be bad manners. That you felt the need to tell the whole forum about it and that you were so perscriptive in your language ("If one is an atheist one should never speak this way. One should say...") annoys my sense of good taste, and thus I feel wrankled and participate. It doesn't help that you called out the group with which I identify in your perscription.
Anyway, in asking if you were up on your own moral pedestal, I was referring to your comment about never meeting anyone with exemplary morals. I thought it was funny; it shows that you're certainly not below casting aspertions at other people's morals (OPM). The question is if you feel yourself on equal footing as them or above them. From what you said above and in the past, I'd wager equal footing. but it's off topic and not important. Carry on.
Edited by docpotato, : for fun.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 4:34 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by robinrohan, posted 07-10-2006 5:52 PM docpotato has not replied
 Message 149 by Phat, posted 07-10-2006 6:02 PM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 205 of 304 (330816)
07-11-2006 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by robinrohan
07-11-2006 1:02 PM


Re: Boasting
One has a skewed vision of oneself and of life.
I don't know how you can possibly claim this with any degree of certainty. You aren't allowing for the possibility that you are the one who's got the skewed vision about yourself and life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2006 1:02 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2006 1:15 PM docpotato has replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 211 of 304 (330824)
07-11-2006 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by robinrohan
07-11-2006 1:15 PM


Re: Boasting
Of course that's always possible.
Is it also possible that the people making these statements aren't exaggerating?
(though I do agree with you that stating that one has an exemplary moral character is useless at best since it is unverifable on an internet forum [and by whose morals is one exemplary? and probably everywhere else])

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2006 1:15 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2006 1:28 PM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 232 of 304 (330895)
07-11-2006 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by robinrohan
07-11-2006 4:56 PM


Re: Boasting
No no. It's, "The horror. The horror."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2006 4:56 PM robinrohan has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 261 of 304 (330985)
07-11-2006 11:56 PM


I'm just glad that, through all this, I've been able to maintain my exemplary moral character.
And my overall happiness about the meaningless nature of human existence.

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by Nighttrain, posted 07-12-2006 2:39 AM docpotato has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 270 of 304 (331004)
07-12-2006 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by Faith
07-12-2006 12:46 AM


Re: Boasting
I believe the point is:
One doesn't know they are suffering.
One assumes they are suffering.
One then feels something based on one's (possibly faulty) assumption.
I think, then, that this feeling has absolutely zero to do with the reality of who these people actually are and everything to do with the baggage the person having the feeling carries with them.
I do think that it is sensible at times to make such assumptions. It makes life easier to sort through. But I also believe that it is folly to cling to them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Faith, posted 07-12-2006 12:46 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by Faith, posted 07-12-2006 3:08 AM docpotato has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024