I seem to recall that I asked you to respond with something more than just, "Nuh uh!" You didn't. I tell you now that if in the future you cannot find a way to put something of substance in your relpies, I shall have no further reason to communicate with you on this topic.
My friend did take advice from a drunk person and, if I can take the word of a person who sometimes drinks as true, our talk did in fact help him.
Unfortunately, you're wrong subbie. Just because you recognized a friend's needs once does not mean much.
You really must tell me whence you acquired this remarkable ability to know more about what has happened to me than I do. It's fascinating.
In fact, what it does mean is that you were completely, utterly and famously wrong when you said that drug use renders one unable to tend to another's needs. What's more, this was not an isolated incident. During the score or more poker nights that I have attended, dozens of problems have come up, some less important than others, some more. In each case, the game took a back seat to tending to a friend's problem.
Your ability to recognize the needs of your friends has decreased.
Ah, now you're changing your tune. Has my ability
decreased? Probably somewhat. But it never disappeared as you initially claimed. I'm glad to see you've recognized the error of your ways.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat