However, none of us know the circumstances behind that boy's killing.
I'm sure there is, in fact, a perfectly reasonable set of circumstances that make it okay to kill a young boy, who is clutching a white surrender flag in his hands.
Who took the picture?
Dahr Jamail.
Who is claiming the boy was surrendering?
A white flag is a fairly universal symbol. It is, at the very least, known to the US Army.
Of course Al Jazzera (sp?) wouldn't skew or manufacture news to support their view, would they?
I have no idea if they would or not. But Jamail doesn't work for Al Jazeera, so I'm not sure what the relevance is.
The photos to which I linked, however, were taken under the supervision of the US military.
I'm sure that detailed forensic analysis of each of those "murders" would point directly to a brutal jack-booted American soldier who intentionally set out to kill innocent people because they are Muslims.(sarcasm)
No, I'm sure the boy was a total fucker.
It just seemed to me that you were using the shock value of those bloody corpses to imply that whatever the protesters do, it is really all the fault of the Americans.
Okay. I just said, in my last post, that it wasn't my intent, but whatever.
"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird