Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,803 Year: 4,060/9,624 Month: 931/974 Week: 258/286 Day: 19/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Message from the future
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 53 of 90 (247742)
09-30-2005 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Parasomnium
09-30-2005 3:02 PM


Re: Circular causality
Kant
quote:
My knowledge, then, is to be verified by itself, which is far from being sufficient for truth. For as the object is external to me, and the knowledge is in me, I can only judge whether my knowledge of the object agrees with my knowledge of the object. Such a circle in explanation was called by the ancients Diallelos.
You already judged the figure's form. Will your sensibility to move through your ego instead.
quote:
And the logicians were accused of this fallacy by the sceptics, who remarked that this account of truth was as if a man before a judicial tribunal should make a statement, and appeal in support of it to a witness whom no one knows, but who defends his own credibility by saying that the man who had called him as a witness is an honourable man. The charge was certainly well-founded.Only the solution of the problem referred to is absolutely impossible for any man.
It is not however impossible for you to think that gravity waves resonate within your twistor branes by a Keynesian synthetic adaptation of bonded range changes, only that as such is soooo within the circle, if it exists. Since you are inside the perimeter, you reason that A, B, and C are outside and thus if you know you exist so such even if you did not know, if or how to get there, there-where the domain crossed the range nonethenever the less was. This is not a simple matter of writing out ones disagreement vs. using the verbal shortcut. It seems that Bertrand Russel wrote on many non- logical topics such as to significantly void this charge. The sceptic however is not the creationist this time but the evolutionist.
p40-1.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Parasomnium, posted 09-30-2005 3:02 PM Parasomnium has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 70 of 90 (248015)
10-01-2005 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Parasomnium
09-29-2005 9:26 AM


Re: Message from the future (updated)
This might help you in not omitting what I had said. These are some notes for a paper in English class I am next to write. In the end I will to think that I can show within Kant's use of "spirit" how databasenormalization does ply the four figure subtility FROM any list of a fish, an amphibian, a reptile and a bird/mammal. That is rather ambitious and I have not it writtenyet but I think& in the future etc I will make it through all the Swift hoops looped I hope in the process of the same pattern I have always made here on EvC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Parasomnium, posted 09-29-2005 9:26 AM Parasomnium has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024