Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolutionary science is fraudulent and/or inaccurate?
nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 1 of 5 (231072)
08-08-2005 3:05 PM


Randman, in keeping with a long tradition of Creationists to visit EvC, has repeatedly claimed that the findings of Evolutionary Biology are fraudulent. IOW, that Biologists are knowingly lying to the entire scientific community as well as to the public.
When confronted with a request to provide evidence of this fraud, randman has instead attemted to equate "fraud" with "inaccuracy".
Furthermore, when asked to provide evidence for this "fraud" and/or "inaccuracy". he will make additional vague claims regarding some finding that he will not support with any kind of reference or citation.
So, I thought it would be useful to create a thread for randman or any Creationist to list and link to specific Evolutionary Biology, Genetics, Biochemistry, Zoology, Palontology, etc., papers from the professional literature which show evidence of containing false, inaccurate data, or poor methodology.
Such examples should be explained in some detail as to why the papers' conclusions or findings should be considered untrustworthy and the result of fraud.
Likewise, it would be very useful for there to be an accompanying discussion of how this rather widespread fraud and/or imcompetence and sloppy science has impacted the application of Biology to medicine, agriculture, ecology, and other fields.
Should this go in the Misc. topics in Evolution forum?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 08-09-2005 10:33 AM nator has replied
 Message 4 by nator, posted 08-09-2005 3:57 PM nator has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 2 of 5 (231309)
08-09-2005 10:33 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
08-08-2005 3:05 PM


Could you take a stab at a more objective and less personal OP? Is It Science? seems the right forum.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 08-08-2005 3:05 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nator, posted 08-09-2005 3:56 PM Admin has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 3 of 5 (231490)
08-09-2005 3:56 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
08-09-2005 10:33 AM


sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 08-09-2005 10:33 AM Admin has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2201 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 4 of 5 (231491)
08-09-2005 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
08-08-2005 3:05 PM


I thought it would be useful to create a thread for any Creationist to list and link to specific Evolutionary Biology, Genetics, Biochemistry, Zoology, Palontology, etc., papers from the professional literature which show evidence of containing false, inaccurate data, or poor methodology.
Such examples should be explained in some detail as to why the papers' conclusions or findings should be considered untrustworthy and the result of fraud.
Likewise, it would be very useful for there to be an accompanying discussion of how this rather widespread fraud and/or imcompetence and sloppy science has impacted the application of Biology to medicine, agriculture, ecology, and other fields.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 08-08-2005 3:05 PM nator has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 5 of 5 (231670)
08-09-2005 9:42 PM


Released to [forum=-11].

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024