Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God exists: the moral argument from evil.
iano
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 1 of 7 (327120)
06-28-2006 10:20 AM


quote:
1. If God does not exist, trancendant, objective values of good and evil do not exist
2. Evil does exist
3. Therefore objective values exist and some things are really, basically, fundamentally bad.
4 Therefore God exists
Discuss.
{For the record, this is from here, where it was off-topic. - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-28-2006 10:49 AM iano has replied
 Message 4 by AdminPD, posted 06-28-2006 2:00 PM iano has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 7 (327130)
06-28-2006 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
06-28-2006 10:20 AM


I'm not going to give this one an easy pass
1. If God does not exist, trancendant, objective values of good and evil do not exist.
I'm not "Mr. Logic", but the structure of "If a negative, then a negative" seems like a strange way to start a chain of reasonings.
Might that #1 be better phrased: "If trancendant, objective values of good and evil do exist, then God exists"? And then take it from there.
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit: Please submit a revised opening message as a new message in THIS topic. If and when promoted, that individual message can become the new message 1.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], [thread=-19,-337], [thread=-14,-1073]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 06-28-2006 10:20 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by iano, posted 06-28-2006 11:35 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 3 of 7 (327151)
06-28-2006 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
06-28-2006 10:49 AM


Re: I'm not going to give this one an easy pass
"If I don't go to work then I will not be paid" is negative logic - but perfect for all that.
If there is something wrong with the then which follows from the if I'm sure that will come up in discussion. Indeed it is the point of the discussion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-28-2006 10:49 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by AdminPD, posted 07-08-2006 8:08 AM iano has replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 4 of 7 (327217)
06-28-2006 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
06-28-2006 10:20 AM


quote:
1. If God does not exist, trancendant, objective values of good and evil do not exist
2. Evil does exist
3. Therefore objective values exist and some things are really, basically, fundamentally bad.
4 Therefore God exists
Just something I noticed.
1. If God does not exist then you say that transcendent, objective values of good and evil do not exist. You might want to clarify how you are using transcendent.
transcedent - 1. surpassing, excelling or the theological meaning 2. existing apart from the material universe.
2. Evil does exist. Above you mentioned transcendent, objective values of good and evil. Wouldn't it be more precise to say that the value of evil exists and more specifically the transcendent value depending on how you are using it?
3. Same here. Wouldn't you need to say that transcendent, objective values exist?
Even in logic statements, don't you need to keep the terms the same?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 06-28-2006 10:20 AM iano has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 5 of 7 (329816)
07-08-2006 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by iano
06-28-2006 11:35 AM


Review
Hey iano,
Do you still wish to pursue this topic? If yes, please respond to my questions in previous message.
If no, then let me know and I'll close this proposal.
Thanks
AdminPD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by iano, posted 06-28-2006 11:35 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by iano, posted 07-11-2006 5:58 AM AdminPD has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 6 of 7 (330716)
07-11-2006 5:58 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by AdminPD
07-08-2006 8:08 AM


Re: Review
Hi PD.
Sorry, forgot this one. I'm off on holidays for a week or so at the end of this week and won't get time to deal with it. If you can leave it I'll come back to it then. Otherwise you can close it.
Thanks for the comments - it needs tidying alright
ian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by AdminPD, posted 07-08-2006 8:08 AM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by AdminPD, posted 07-11-2006 7:53 AM iano has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 7 of 7 (330736)
07-11-2006 7:53 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by iano
07-11-2006 5:58 AM


Re: Review
I'll hold it open. Let me know when you're ready for the revised version to be reviewed.
Enjoy your week.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by iano, posted 07-11-2006 5:58 AM iano has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024