quote:
1. If God does not exist, trancendant, objective values of good and evil do not exist
2. Evil does exist
3. Therefore objective values exist and some things are really, basically, fundamentally bad.
4 Therefore God exists
Just something I noticed.
1. If God does not exist then you say that
transcendent, objective values of good and evil do not exist. You might want to clarify how you are using transcendent.
transcedent - 1. surpassing, excelling or the theological meaning 2. existing apart from the material universe.
2. Evil does exist. Above you mentioned transcendent, objective values of good and evil. Wouldn't it be more precise to say that the value of evil exists and more specifically the transcendent value depending on how you are using it?
3. Same here. Wouldn't you need to say that transcendent, objective values exist?
Even in logic statements, don't you need to keep the terms the same?