|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Are there any "problems" with the ToE that are generally not addressed? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: I didn't know Germans were famous for their fine china. Sorry, couldn't help it.
quote: So the problem is that Robert doesn't believe it so therefore it didn't happen. That is a pretty poor way to frame and argument. Why don't you show us evidence of deep sea environments only emerging in the last few thousand years. If not, then I will go with the evidence that shows a static environment for millions of years.
quote: In the case of deep sea environments, the writing is in the rocks.
quote: If it's possible what is your proble? Where is the problem for ToE? This message has been edited by Loudmouth, 09-24-2004 11:41 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1534 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
Loudmouth writes: Hee hee hee. this is funny!!!
I didn't know Germans were famous for their fine china.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
WT writes: Message 134http://www.jqjacobs.net/anthro/paleo/scavenging.html "Fossils, though few and rare, are by for the most important evidence we have of hominid evolution." Darwins Terrier writes: http://< !--UB EvC Forum: Some Evidence Against Evolution -->http://EvC Forum: Some Evidence Against Evolution -->EvC Forum: Some Evidence Against Evolution< !--UE--> Next, it would hardly be a surprise if "a smart scientist from another discipline" would think there's little to go on. There really isn't a vast quantity of hominin fossils by volume -- which is no surprise either; it's due to the taphonomic conditions where these things are found. You could fit the entire hominin fossil record in the boot of, well maybe a large estate. (No, I won’t translate; Americans never bother!) But the question is, so what? It is not sheer quantity that matters, but what a highly experienced anatomist and palaeontologist can tell from what there is. My original point remains unscathed: Evolutionists have admittedly pronounced as fact based upon a scant paucity of disputed evidence. Your halloween movie prop picture can be and is asserted to be whatever you evos say it is. Its age is arbitrarily changed annually. Common sense says nobody can objectively determine that a said object is millions of years old - that is a dead give away of bullshit. Evos cannot even recognize Biblical evidence in the thousands of years in age yet they suddenly can matter of factly determine bits of bones to be in the millions. Yet we have a physical structure in Egypt which decimates the atheist worldview (Great Pyramid) and its Divine intelligent design confirming the written word is winked at. But you evos can declare as fact things to be thus and such millions of years old but the voluminous irrefutable physical see for yourself evidence of the GP is completely ignored. Hominind evolution is based upon virtually nothing. What we have is pure verified inconsistency: Any paucity of evidence within the sweetheart realm of evolutionary myths is not a problem but the evidence of ancient Israel is treated differently. The only evidence I need for the Exodus is the book of Exodus.
Exodus 32:4 and fashioned it with a graving tool, after he had made it a molten calf: and they said, These be thy gods The authors of the Bible are honest reporters whereas the wizards of evolution are a ghoulish patchwork glueing together scraps of bones. The evo god is quadrupeds/created things which is sin like the Exodus text above says. And we know from other passages that Satan incites sin/molten calfs/quadrupeds/animals.
Romans 1: Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. That word "image" in the greek is the same word which we get "icon" from, hence the verse pinpoints the "icons of evolution"/corruptible anthropon (fossils), birds, quadrupeds, creeping things (animals). How many evos have an avatar of an animal ? "these be your gods O' Darwinists" The above was written 2000 years ago. Darwinism fulfilled this prophecy. The "irony" of the text is inescapable - Divinely inescapable.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rei Member (Idle past 7043 days) Posts: 1546 From: Iowa City, IA Joined: |
quote: How many times do I have to ask you whether you consider more than 500 neanderthal individuals' remains, a fair number of them complete, to be such "a scant paucity". And please state what is disputed about them. And this is just neanderthals alone - do we need to get into some of the other 30+ fossil hominid species? Yes, about half of those species only have a few fossils. Many, however, have a large number of fossils.
quote: Cite a single case of two scientists that believe in evolution who have stated that it is something different from what the other scientist says. Just one case. As a note, I will hound you on this one until you either cite such a case, or publicly drop the claim.
quote: Cite a single case of its estimated age changing by any relevant amount. Just one case. As a note, I will hound you on this one until you either cite such a case, or publicly drop the claim.
quote: You know, I don't give a flying flip about your "argument from personal incredulity". Either address the techniques involved in dating it, or publicly drop the claim.
quote: Funny, because you can't seem to present any. Arachnophilia presented you with a simple challenge: He shows you a fossil hominid (something from a population several million years ago which evolved in places that we have to guess at to find) for every hebrew artifact from the Exodus (something from a huge number of people supposedly a few thousand years ago) that you present. You haven't presented a single one. Now, why is that? Please answer.
quote: Once again: Address the techniques in the proper thread, or publicly concede the point.
quote: Go back to your pyramidology thread; you have about a dozen points that are open that you need to challenge.
quote: Yeah, if you call "virtually nothing" several hundred thousand man hours and tens of thousands of bones of thousands of individuals. You have an interesting concept of "virtually nothing", you know that?
quote: When are you going to present what this "paucity of evidence is"? Willowtree, I grow weary of your vagueness. This is, again, another direct challenge: Put Up Or Shut Up.
quote: That explains an awful lot.
quote: When did you meet them to assess their credibility? If you want to assess their credibility based on evidence, you need to present the evidence, something you keep refusing to do.
quote: When did you meet them to assess their credibility? If you want to assess their credibility based on evidence, you need to present the evidence, something you keep refusing to do.
quote: No, the god of the vast majority of believers of evolution in the US is YHVH.
quote: Oh really? "I proved the existence of God. I am probably the only person in the history of the Internet to incorporate all the evidence and their correct explanations in proving the existence of God." This message has been edited by Rei, 09-24-2004 02:55 PM "Illuminant light, illuminate me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
I am ignoring the content of your post because you ignored the content of my post.
Anyone can produce a long word packed post just to distance themself from the original post and its uncomfortable arguments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1497 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Anyone can produce a long word packed post just to distance themself from the original post When did "I can't read" become a legitimate rebuttal to arguments? Just curious.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: And that creature is creationism. They think themselves wise enough to tell God how he created instead of letting God's creation tell them how He created. They worship the Bible above all else, even God himself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rei Member (Idle past 7043 days) Posts: 1546 From: Iowa City, IA Joined: |
I responded to almost everything in your post - I even put your words in quote boxes. Now, respond to my post.
"Illuminant light, illuminate me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
You responded to chopped up quotes and evaded my points especially the initial quotes.
Anyone with a lick of God sense knows man could not evolved, that the pseudo evidence is the result of God senseless persons creating and manufacturing evidence because the alternative is not an option - God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13046 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 2.7 |
Those who choose to engage WillowTree are advised to stay on topic and to scrupulously follow the forum guidelines.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13046 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 2.7 |
Engage the discussion or stop posting to this thread.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rei Member (Idle past 7043 days) Posts: 1546 From: Iowa City, IA Joined: |
Either cite *specifically* how I was misrepresenting you, or respond to my post. I'm not going to let you get away with what you keep on doing here by refusing to present specifics despite repeated attempts for them; I mean, for god's sake, you're even refusing to present specifics in your explanation for why you're not responding to my post asking for specifics!
"Illuminant light, illuminate me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
You had to summon Admin to bail you out.
I began this exchange with two quotes from evos. Message 153 Rei has evaded the quotes - fine. That has been my only point - that and the facts in the quotes that admit a paucity of hominid fossil evidence. Answer my points or snivel to Admin to further rescue you. This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 09-24-2004 04:15 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
I am leaving but when I come back I will decimate your dating nonsense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rei Member (Idle past 7043 days) Posts: 1546 From: Iowa City, IA Joined: |
1. I did not summon the admin; they came on their own, and quite justly.
2. The first quote that you cited was already debunked by Arachnophilia in message 135. You only responded to his debunking with a non sequitur. How dare you bring the quote back up without addressing his debunking, and then refuse to answer my entire post because I didn't basically repeat what he said again? The second quote was from an evc poster who isn't here to debate. That evc poster didn't provide a reference either. What, do you want me to argue with a wall? Is that your only excuse for not responding to my post? That I didn't cover every single line of your post? You're covering zero lines of my post!. *And*, you complained about my post being too long as it is! I want a response to my post. This message has been edited by Rei, 09-24-2004 04:37 PM "Illuminant light, illuminate me."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024