Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reciprocal Prayer - For Mike and Buz
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4579 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 31 of 69 (66460)
11-14-2003 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Zealot
11-14-2003 8:49 AM


So, did you miss the part where the killer was described as "crazy mad" by a barmaid, and had previously mentioned the possibility of killing the guy whom he in fact killed?
The relevant distincion Dan has been trying to make is between the lowering of inhibitions toward acts of violence, and the creation of a novel impulse in the mind of someone otherwise uninclined thereto. This story doesn't score any points against his premise.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Zealot, posted 11-14-2003 8:49 AM Zealot has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 32 of 69 (66461)
11-14-2003 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Zealot
11-14-2003 8:49 AM


Sounds like he was pretty Psycho already to me. And I suspect the Cider had more to do with it than the Canabis. I've known people get violent on Alcohol before, but never once on Hashish.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Zealot, posted 11-14-2003 8:49 AM Zealot has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 9:21 AM Dr Jack has replied
 Message 40 by Coragyps, posted 11-14-2003 10:12 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 69 (66462)
11-14-2003 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Zealot
11-14-2003 8:49 AM


Zephyr and Jack pretty much cover it. It says in the article that the guy was already nuts.
Besides that... lager and cannabis? Beer and weed?
Next thing you know we'll be arguing whether caffiene causes people to go apeshit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Zealot, posted 11-14-2003 8:49 AM Zealot has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 69 (66463)
11-14-2003 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Dr Jack
11-14-2003 9:09 AM


quote:
I've known people get violent on Alcohol before, but never once on Hashish.
Might not even have been hash. Canabis? Could have been marijuana.
On that note, my man Bill Hicks strikes again:
I have never seen two people on pot get in a fight because it is fucking IMPOSSIBLE.
"Hey, buddy!"
"Hey, what?"
"Ummmmmmm...."
End of argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 11-14-2003 9:09 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Dr Jack, posted 11-14-2003 9:30 AM Dan Carroll has replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 35 of 69 (66465)
11-14-2003 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Dan Carroll
11-14-2003 9:21 AM


I though hashish, Canabis and marijuana were synonyms?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 9:21 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 9:38 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 69 (66466)
11-14-2003 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Dr Jack
11-14-2003 9:30 AM


Hash can be any number of things. I think it mainly depends on the lingo of your area.
Last time someone offered me hash, it was the resin they had collected off the leaves of marijuana while drying their home-grown.
Another time someone offered me hash, and it was a block of unidentified smokeable hallucinogen. (I turned 'em down. I make it a point never to smoke anything where the guy offering it to me can't even quite tell what it is.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Dr Jack, posted 11-14-2003 9:30 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-14-2003 9:59 AM Dan Carroll has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 37 of 69 (66467)
11-14-2003 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Dan Carroll
11-14-2003 9:38 AM


Just say 'whoa"
Time to put the brakes on the drug tangent.
I'll try to track down that drug topic that the non-admin mode started.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 9:38 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 10:01 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 69 (66468)
11-14-2003 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Adminnemooseus
11-14-2003 9:59 AM


Re: Just say 'whoa
Narc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-14-2003 9:59 AM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-14-2003 10:07 AM Dan Carroll has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 39 of 69 (66472)
11-14-2003 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Dan Carroll
11-14-2003 10:01 AM


Re: Just say 'whoa'
"Just say 'thanks'" - Ken Kesey (I think)
Now back to the topic that got the "POTM" nomination.
AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 10:01 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 10:34 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 40 of 69 (66473)
11-14-2003 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Dr Jack
11-14-2003 9:09 AM


Except that the word "assassin" comes from the same root as "hashish" - some Middle Eastern bunch back in Crusades days would get wrecked on hash (the resin-off-pot-flowers sort) and then go do battle.
It must have worked differently back then.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Dr Jack, posted 11-14-2003 9:09 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 69 (66475)
11-14-2003 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by Adminnemooseus
11-14-2003 10:07 AM


Re: Just say 'whoa'
All right, all right. I'm all for continuing drug talk in the other thread.
Anyone else have an intense prayer/meditation/other experience?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-14-2003 10:07 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by zephyr, posted 11-14-2003 10:45 AM Dan Carroll has not replied
 Message 45 by :æ:, posted 11-14-2003 4:14 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4579 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 42 of 69 (66478)
11-14-2003 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Dan Carroll
11-14-2003 10:34 AM


Re: Just say 'whoa'
Once, after a moderate helping of morning glory seeds, I sat outside and felt physically connected to everything I could see... could feel the life in the huge tree in my backyard, even the grass.
Occasionally, when I prayed as a Christian, I felt what I believed were responses from God. In retrospect, I think Augustine was right when he said that people construct the expected response themselves - I never heard anything that my subconscious (or even conscious) mind could not have manufactured from my knowledge of my own belief system. In other words, no surprises, no new insight or revelation, merely an inference from what I was taught that the answer was obvious. Occam would be proud, don't you think?
In my recent experiences (hallucinogens included) I've never felt like anyone or anything was communicating with me. I was definitely aware that all the insights were my own, even if some surprised me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 10:34 AM Dan Carroll has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Zealot, posted 11-14-2003 3:30 PM zephyr has replied

  
Zealot
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 69 (66503)
11-14-2003 3:30 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by zephyr
11-14-2003 10:45 AM


Re: Just say 'whoa'
Occasionally, when I prayed as a Christian, I felt what I believed were responses from God. In retrospect, I think Augustine was right when he said that people construct the expected response themselves - I never heard anything that my subconscious (or even conscious) mind could not have manufactured from my knowledge of my own belief system. In other words, no surprises, no new insight or revelation, merely an inference from what I was taught that the answer was obvious. Occam would be proud, don't you think?
If you did see God. Do you think you would know if it was him ?
Also, do you think anyone would believe you, or would it be a product of your subconscious ? For instance, as time goes by, would you dismiss any experiences you had as coincidental ?
cheers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by zephyr, posted 11-14-2003 10:45 AM zephyr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 3:35 PM Zealot has not replied
 Message 55 by zephyr, posted 11-16-2003 1:16 PM Zealot has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 69 (66504)
11-14-2003 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Zealot
11-14-2003 3:30 PM


Re: Just say 'whoa'
quote:
If you did see God. Do you think you would know if it was him ?
If God was trying to make his presence known, you'd think he'd be a little more direct. I mean... why respond at all if he's not going to let you know he's doing so?
And if he's just going to respond by supplying a coincidence, then how could he possibly blame anyone for calling it a coincidence?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Zealot, posted 11-14-2003 3:30 PM Zealot has not replied

  
:æ: 
Suspended Member (Idle past 7214 days)
Posts: 423
Joined: 07-23-2003


Message 45 of 69 (66507)
11-14-2003 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Dan Carroll
11-14-2003 10:34 AM


I have like experiences all the time when I meditate. I don't have what you would call 'conversations' with myself, but instead I regularly sense an inflow of 'unofficial' information about the universe. Its not the type that contains factual info about external reality, but it supplies a sort of deeper intuitive understanding of the factual world. It's not like I can tell you what the final score of tonight's Laker game will be, but more like the final score will make more sense when I observe it since it will be couched in a richer experiential context.
My favorite experiences, however, have been in dreaming. I'm always working towards greater lucidity in my dreams, and I've even had a few instances in which I've held two dreams simultaneously. THAT is a difficult experience to describe. If you can imagine being in two places at once you might approach it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Dan Carroll, posted 11-14-2003 10:34 AM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024