originquestor
Guest
|
|
Message 1 of 27 (15635)
08-18-2002 10:28 PM
|
|
|
Intelligent design as described in the writings of Wm A Dembski seems to be a valid and useful way to look at the biological realm. First, I was awed by the descriptions of some living beings and their amazingly arrayed technology. In one paper, Dembski describes the operation of a bacterial flagellum which is used to propel the bacteria through the water. The Falgellum rotates @ about 10,000 rpm, can change direction in 1/4 of a turn, has O rings, and a motor. Dembski states that this is flagellum represents Intelligent Design as measured by his criteria. He then claims that evolution could not produce such a mechanism given the operational features of selection, genetic development and so on. He challenges evolutionist to describe and demonstrate some path by which this flagellum could be developed, stating that it’s not enough to presume evolution can make it happen, or to extrapolate from a single factor (eg., one common gene in two bacteria out of 50 needed form the flagellum to work). Hand-waving and stories are not enough. Invoking the operation of chance, Invoking partial operation of known or unknown genetic processes don’t cut the mustard. Stories, scenarios and interpretion/extrapolation of geological processes won’t do either.
|