I tried to search, but couldn't find what I was looking for. I'm sure it's out there somewhere, but incase it's not, I thought I would ask.
I once heard the "But where did THAT come from argument?". You can argue speciation and macroevolution all you want, but if you can't give a valid explanation of where the original being came from, than you don't have much of an argument. I believe much of evolution is correct, but that it does have a few flaws.
If you throw out creation, and try to run with evolution, how do you explain where the first proton came from? It seems to me like much of the theory of evolution is starting in the middle. Evolutionists are showing how things can change, on the micro and macro levels, but I've never heard a good argument for how the whole process started. The big bang can't even account for the beginning, since it's assuming something was there to blow up. Is all of evolution simply starting in the middle?
Jeremy
This message has been edited by Waddell1, 01-17-2005 12:45 AM
™ Version 4.2