Please continue the debate, keeping rule #3 firmly in your mind.
quote:
Its a common courtesy, in debate, to answer the point your opponent proposes. Seeing as that is not noccurring, there cannot said to be a debate.
Call it what you want, but keep rule #3 in mind in all of your interactions with other posters here. Here is rule #3 again:
3. Respect for others is the rule here. Argue the position, not the person. The Britannica says, "Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach."
It is my estimation that your choice to insult another poster and to use all-caps was a clear violation of rule #3.
If you wish to have another Admin judge your post, then please let me know.
here goes Contracycle into wacko mode again.
quote:
Is tyhat within the bounds of tghe rules of debate? Am I allowed to respond "fuck of Schraf", or is personal abuse another admin privilege? It seems whats good for goose is not good for the gander - yet again.
You know, you are completely correct.
In my non-admin mode, I apologize for my disrespectful behavior.
™ Version 4.2
