Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Were The Prophets/Messiahs Jesus and Mohammed Inspired By The Same God?
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 61 of 299 (272141)
12-23-2005 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
12-23-2005 10:00 AM


Re: It doesn't matter
I forgot to clarify the intent of my statement. The point that I meant to make is that in most of these translations there is the modern English JEHOVAH several times,
ok, fine. i'll play. here's the first place the word "jehovah" appears in the english kjv.
quote:
Exd 6:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by [the name of] God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
and here's the list of other versions, same source as before.
quote:
NLT - Exd 6:3 - I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Almighty, though I did not reveal my name, the LORD, to them.
Footnote:
a) Hebrew El Shaddai.
b) Hebrew Yahweh; traditionally rendered Jehovah.
New Living Translation © 1996 Tyndale Charitable Trust
NKJV - Exd 6:3 - I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by My name Lord I was not known to them.
New King James Version © 1982 Thomas Nelson
NASB - Exd 6:3 - and I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as God Almighty, but {by} My name, LORD, I did not make Myself known to them.
New American Standard Bible © 1995 Lockman Foundation
RSV - Exd 6:3 - I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.
Revised Standard Version © 1947, 1952.
Webster - Exd 6:3 - And I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, by [the name of] God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
Noah Webster Version 1833 Info
Young - Exd 6:3 - and I appear unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as God Almighty; as to My name Jehovah, I have not been known to them;
Robert Young Literal Translation 1862, 1887, 1898 Info
Darby - Exd 6:3 - And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as the Almighty God; but by my name Jehovah I was not made known to them.
J.N.Darby Translation 1890 Info
ASV - Exd 6:3 - and I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as God Almighty; but by my name Jehovah I was not known to them.
American Standard Version 1901 Info
HNV - Exd 6:3 - and I appeared to Avraham, to Yitzchak, and to Ya`akov, as El Shaddai; but by my name the LORD I was not known to them.
Hebrew Names Version 2000 Info
Vulgate - Exd 6:3 - qui apparui Abraham Isaac et Iacob in Deo omnipotente et nomen meum Adonai non indicavi eis
Jerome's Latin Vulgate 405 A.D. Info
i'm sorry, this "most translations" thing doesn't cut it. we're seeing it in a FEW late 19th century translations, and the kjv. those are not MODERN english translations.
the point being that these linguists do recognize that when properly translated, the JEHOVAH as being the ligitimate proper name of the Biblical God, i.e. YHWH/JEHOVAH.
"jehovah" is meaningless gobledygook in hebrew. i'm sorry, but it is. it's not a real word. yahweh, on the other, IS a real word. it means "he that is."
but as Purpledawn points out the only reason it is substituted LORD, (Hebrew=ADONAI) is to evade the YHWH, due to later OT superstitious ideas about usage of the proper name of God. The RECEIVED text/manuscrips, from which the KJV was taken DOES HAVE YHWH in it thousands of times.
and the question was, if i recall, does the tendency to translate yahweh as "LORD" have anything do with the word "adonay."
and yes, it does. it has to do with that superstition. the aditions of the vowel points for adonay has to do with that superstition. it is utterly incorrect to read them as part of the real hebrew word. and i've pointed out, it doesn't even make sense in hebrew spelling.
. Thus the more literal 1901 American Standard Version, my favorite and the most accurately literal translation existing, imo (ASV) uses it (Jehovah) properly thousands of times.
there is no proper use of "jehovah." it is not a real word, and it is not god's name. it's a made up acronym.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 10:00 AM Buzsaw has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 62 of 299 (272144)
12-23-2005 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by purpledawn
12-23-2005 7:57 AM


Re: YHWH
I had understood that YHWH was rendered LORD (adonai) when reading the text so as not to say the proper name of God.
yes, it is. i was just trying to walk buzsaw through logic one step at a time. the hebrews have a practice of not speaking the name of god, and so they substitute the word adonay (among other things) for his name. this particular practice leads to modern english translations redering yhvh as "LORD" in small caps, as well as the masoretes adding the vowel points of the adonay to yhvh.
that, in turn led to the yahweh/jehovah confussion. but people just don't like hearing their traditions are wrong.
I did notice this verse in which the word "lord" is the word adonai and "GOD" is the YHWH. So in this instance YHWH is rendered GOD.
it happens sometimes. word order in biblical hebrew isn't exactly like english, and sometimes things get switched around.
YHWH is supposedly the proper name of the Jewish God though, right or am I missing what you are saying?
yhvh, yes. it was probably said "yahweh" but certainly not "jehovah" which is an anglicized german transliteration of the acronym that appears in the masoretic text. it is NOT god's name.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by purpledawn, posted 12-23-2005 7:57 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by purpledawn, posted 12-23-2005 5:23 PM arachnophilia has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 63 of 299 (272145)
12-23-2005 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Buzsaw
12-22-2005 11:10 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
Thus if you wish to convert to Islam you MUST say ALLAH IS GOD AND MOHAMMED IS HIS PROPHET. Notice that in this sentence you have two words, one a proper name and the other the title, but both with the same meaning!
compare it to "adam" and "Adam" in the hebrew of genesis. the use of names as titles and vice versa is quite common in that area. do you not see how a title can become a name?
look at yahweh. "he that is" is a title, isn't it? and "elohym" was originally a NAME of a specific semitic god, el. so the name ≠ title thing is really bogus. they interchange over time.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Buzsaw, posted 12-22-2005 11:10 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by PaulK, posted 12-23-2005 4:31 PM arachnophilia has not replied
 Message 68 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 6:27 PM arachnophilia has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 64 of 299 (272153)
12-23-2005 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by arachnophilia
12-23-2005 4:19 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
I would add that the declaration is in Arabic and the translation Buz gives is far from the only one.
Here's another:
"There is no god but Allah. Muhammad is the messenger of Allah"
So far as I am aware the point of the declaration is that it is a declaration of monotheism and acceptance of Huhammad as a Prophet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 4:19 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 5:27 PM PaulK has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 65 of 299 (272183)
12-23-2005 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by arachnophilia
12-23-2005 4:15 PM


Re: YHWH
Understood.
Thanks Purple

There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it. -Edith Wharton

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 4:15 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 299 (272188)
12-23-2005 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by PaulK
12-23-2005 4:31 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
PaulK writes:
I would add that the declaration is in Arabic and the translation Buz gives is far from the only one.
Here's another:
"There is no god but Allah. Muhammad is the messenger of Allah"
So far as I am aware the point of the declaration is that it is a declaration of monotheism and acceptance of Huhammad as a Prophet.
Muhammed's family was polytheistic until Muhammed's alleged vision, as I understand, one of the poly-gods being the moon god, Allah, the more supreme of the gods. After his vision, he then set out to and succeeded in establishing Allah as the supreme god and by force, eliminating all other of the 200 plus gods which were worshipped at Mecca. That he made Allah the supreme god does not mean that this god and Jehovah of the Bible are one and the same, even though Muhammed incorporated some aspects of his vague knowledge of Biblical theology into Islam.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by PaulK, posted 12-23-2005 4:31 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by PaulK, posted 12-23-2005 5:47 PM Buzsaw has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 67 of 299 (272196)
12-23-2005 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Buzsaw
12-23-2005 5:27 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
The Quran explcitly states that Allah is the God of Abraham and Moses and Jesus.
You need to deal with that fact - and produce actual evidence rather than opinions.
Page Not Found
(note that this has 3 interleaved translations, each surah is given three times)
2:62
Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.
See also the description of the Exodus starting in 2:47
2:87
We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit
2.136
Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow to Allah (in Islam)."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 5:27 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 9:40 PM PaulK has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 299 (272208)
12-23-2005 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by arachnophilia
12-23-2005 4:19 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
Arach writes:
compare it to "adam" and "Adam" in the hebrew of genesis. the use of names as titles and vice versa is quite common in that area. do you not see how a title can become a name?
I'm not arguing that a title cannot become a name. In Islam it does just that, but not with Yahweh, as I have shown.
Arach writes:
look at yahweh. "he that is" is a title, isn't it? and "elohym" was originally a NAME of a specific semitic god, el. so the name ≠ title thing is really bogus. they interchange over time.
1. "He that is" is not a title. It is the meaning of the proper name, Jehovah. Jehovah is not a "he that is." He is an elohim/a god. "He that is is what his name means/depicts.
2. Adam is a proper name, period. It is neither a title of Adam, the first man nor the meaning of his name.
3. Please document where elohim was ever the proper name of a god.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 4:19 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 6:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 69 of 299 (272214)
12-23-2005 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Buzsaw
12-23-2005 6:27 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
I'm not arguing that a title cannot become a name. In Islam it does just that, but not with Yahweh, as I have shown.
is it not a stretch that a muslims could be using a title like a name, like hebrews do?
1. "He that is" is not a title. It is the meaning of the proper name, Jehovah
no. it is the meaning of yahweh, which is a conjugate of the present tense of hayah. jehovah IS NOT A WORD.
2. Adam is a proper name, period. It is neither a title of Adam, the first man nor the meaning of his name.
perhaps you should look this one up. you see, adam also means "man" as in ha-adam for "the man." but it's also used to mean "mankind" as in genesis 1:26 or so, when god creates adam in his own image.
3. Please document where elohim was ever the proper name of a god.
el was a god in just about every semetic and mesopatamian culture. "elohym" appears to the hebrew version of the ugaritic name of el's court.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Buzsaw, posted 12-23-2005 6:27 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 6:50 PM arachnophilia has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 70 of 299 (272218)
12-23-2005 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by arachnophilia
12-23-2005 6:41 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
I'm not arguing that a title cannot become a name. In Islam it does just that, but not with Yahweh, as I have shown.
quote:
is it not a stretch that a muslims could be using a title like a name, like hebrews do?
Even if they were, what possible difference could it make to this topic? Yahweh is the name God gave for Himself, title, name, it doesn't matter, it does not mean merely "god" and it does NOT mean what "Allah" means, title, name, whatever
3. Please document where elohim was ever the proper name of a god.
quote:
el was a god in just about every semetic and mesopatamian culture. "elohym" appears to the hebrew version of the ugaritic name of el's court.
SO WHAT? Even if Allah WERE derived from "el" or "elohim" that is NOT the derivation of Jehovah/Yahweh/YHWH/Hebrew tetragrammaton.
Sheesh.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 6:41 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 9:23 PM Faith has replied

Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4024 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 71 of 299 (272241)
12-23-2005 8:15 PM


Yahweh is 'Elyon
Just to throw another spanner in the works. Salibi on mistranslations (I can`t do the accents so they are missing) :
”The traditional reading of Genesis 14:22 has long assumed that Abram the Hebrew, in an oath, identifies his own god, Yahweh, with the El ”Elyon of the king of ”Salem’. The Hebrew text of Abram`s oath, (hrmty ydy ”l yhwh ”l ”lywn), has normally been taken to mean ” I have sworn (literally, raised my hand) to Yahweh El ”Elyon (in RSV, ”to the Lord God Most High). Actually, the Hebrew yhwh here (as in examples cited earlier) must be read as the archaic imperfect of the verb hyh-”be’. Hence, the oath must be read as: ”I have sworn, El ”Elyon being a god’ or ”I have sworn (as) El ”Elyon is a god (”l yhwh ”l ”lywn)’, the recognition of the divinity of El ”Elyon being presented as testimony to the truth of the oath. In Psalm 7:18, however, ”Elyon is unequivocally mentioned as a name of Yahweh (sm yhwh ”lywn. ”the name of Yahweh is ”Elyon’). Yahweh is also called ”Elyon in Psalm 47:3. Moreover, ”Elyon rather than Yahweh is cited as the name of the God of Israel in more than twenty other passages of Biblical text where it is commonly rendered in translation as ”Most High’. (The Bible came from Arabia - p147)

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 72 of 299 (272262)
12-23-2005 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Faith
12-23-2005 6:50 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
Even if they were, what possible difference could it make to this topic? Yahweh is the name God gave for Himself, title, name, it doesn't matter, it does not mean merely "god" and it does NOT mean what "Allah" means, title, name, whatever
you know how many times i've heard christians talk about the many names of god, only to list a million titles, descriptions, and adjectives? mulsims hold that allah is the same as the god of abraham, and of jesus. want some better proof? find an arabic translation of the jewish bible -- they do exist. and "elohym" becomes "allah."
quote:
Although the usage of the word Allh is traditionally attributed to Muslims, it is not exclusive to Islam; Arab Christians and various Arabic-speaking Jews (including the Teimanim, several Mizrai communities and some Sephardim) also use it to refer to the monotheist deity. Arabic translations of the Bible also employ it, as do Roman Catholics in Malta (who pronounce it as "Alla"), Christians in Indonesia, who say "Allah Bapa" (Allah the Father) and Christians in the Middle East who use the Aramaic "Allha".
Allah - Wikipedia
SO WHAT? Even if Allah WERE derived from "el" or "elohim" that is NOT the derivation of Jehovah/Yahweh/YHWH/Hebrew tetragrammaton.
Sheesh.
what's your point, fiat? it's just different name, and a different tradition. like judaism doesn't call god by a bunch of different names/titles.
you can sit around all day and say "that's not my god!" but they believe it is, just like you believe your god to be the god of the jews.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 6:50 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 9:34 PM arachnophilia has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 73 of 299 (272266)
12-23-2005 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by arachnophilia
12-23-2005 9:23 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
The master of irrelevance, Arach. Have a merry Christmas.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by arachnophilia, posted 12-23-2005 9:23 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by arachnophilia, posted 12-24-2005 4:02 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 82 by Theodoric, posted 12-24-2005 4:05 PM Faith has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 299 (272268)
12-23-2005 9:40 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by PaulK
12-23-2005 5:47 PM


Re: Allah & Elohim
PaulK writes:
The Quran explcitly states that Allah is the God of Abraham and Moses and Jesus.
You need to deal with that fact - and produce actual evidence rather than opinions.
1. Prior to Islam, the family and ancestorage of Muhammed and the other tribes of the region were polyistic pagans, worshipping pagan gods, over 200 of them at Mecca. The chief god of Muhammed's family and ancestors was the moon god, Allah.
2. What Muhammed has done as revealed in your link from the Quran is to replace/substitute the Biblical god, Jehovah with the chief god of his ancestorage, Allah by associating his family chief god with Biblical patriarchs as being also their god and one and the same as Jehovah. That, however does not make their formerly pagan god, Allah one and the same with Jehovah.
3. I finished reading the long link taken from the Quran and see in it a progressive action, beginning with the association of Muhammed's god Allah with the Biblical patriarchs, mainly Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to which he has added Ishmael. This association progressed to the promise of a messenger to come, {Muhammed} who would bring new revelation, requiring the adherance to Islam and the practices and doctrines set forth in order to be of the true faith
Note the following Quranic quotes from your link which follow the quotes associating Allah with the patriarchs:
Quranic Verses writes:
SHAKIR: And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you follow their religion. Say: Surely Allah's guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.
YUSUFALI: "Our Lord! make of us Muslims, bowing to Thy (Will), and of our progeny a people Muslim, bowing to Thy (will); and show us our place for the celebration of (due) rites; and turn unto us (in Mercy); for Thou art the Oft-Returning, Most Merciful.
YUSUFALI: "Our Lord! send amongst them a Messenger of their own, who shall rehearse Thy Signs to them and instruct them in scripture and wisdom, and sanctify them: For Thou art the Exalted in Might, the Wise."
YUSUFALI: And this was the legacy that Abraham left to his sons, and so did Jacob; "Oh my sons! Allah hath chosen the Faith for you; then die not except in the Faith of Islam."
Indeed We see the turning of your face to heaven, so We shall surely turn you to a qiblah which you shall like; turn then your face towards the Sacred Mosque, and wherever you are, turn your face towards it, and those who have been given the Book most surely know that it is the truth from their Lord; and Allah is not at all heedless of what they do.
SHAKIR: And from whatsoever place you come forth, turn your face towards the Sacred Mosque; and wherever you are turn your faces towards it, so that people shall have no accusation against you, except such of them as are unjust; so do not fear them, and fear Me, that I may complete My favor on you and that you may walk on the right course.
YUSUFALI: A similar (favour have ye already received) in that We have sent among you a Messenger of your own, rehearsing to you Our Signs, and sanctifying you, and instructing you in Scripture and Wisdom, and in new knowledge.
This is for those whose household is not in (the precincts of) the Sacred Mosque. And fear Allah, and know that Allah Is strict in punishment.
Ask of the Children of Israel how many a clear revelation We gave them! He who altereth the grace of Allah after it hath come unto him (for him), lo! Allah is severe in punishment.
The Bible has become Muhammed's model which he used to transform his pagan god into the supreme monotheos being so as to be deemed suitable to emerge into becoming the supreme god of all the world. Muhammed declared that Islam was to replace all other gods (and that includes the Judeo-Christian god, Jehovah}, bar none, worldwide. In order to accomplish this he must needs merge the Biblical and the Quranic gods as one god who was to be called by the name of his god. Thus, there no recognition of the proper name, Jehovah by Muhammed, nor has there been since by his devouts and adherants. Preach Jehovah in Islamic theocracies and you die or are oppressed. Preach Allah and you live and get along.....simple as that.
AbE: The first thing Muhammed did after his aleged vision was to begin purging and clearing out all 200 plus gods from Mecca and enforce by the sword the god Allah to become the Islamic monotheist god. From there he and primarily his successors began moving out to conquer the world by the sword for his god Allah and his religion Islam. The ever progressive march as over 30 nations under control and his little religion is now the fastest growing religion on the planet, including the US of A.
THERE'S NOT ROOM ON THIS PLANET FOR TWO MONOTHEOS GODS, SAY BOTH PROPHETS JESUS AND MUHAMMED. THE DECISIVE LAST WAR, ARMAGEDDON WILL DETERMINE WHICH ONE IS THE TRUE GOD AND WHICH PROPHET/MESSIAH IS THE TRUE PROPHET/MESSIAH. JERUSALEM, THE PLACE OF THE SACRED TEMPLE OF JEHOVAH AND THE PLACE OF THE ISLAMIC DOME OF THE ROCK IS WHERE THAT DECISIVE BATTLE WILL END. THUS THE FOCUS OF THE WHOLE WORLD IN THE REGION!
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 12-23-2005 10:04 PM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by PaulK, posted 12-23-2005 5:47 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by PaulK, posted 12-24-2005 3:13 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 299 (272295)
12-23-2005 10:12 PM


Moving On.
Though debate on names is one aspect of this thread topic, I hope to soon move along in other questions stated in the OP. How about some input on item one which, after all, deals more directly with the thread title?
question one writes:
1. Do the lives and practices of these two prophets suggest that the same god inspired them both?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by arachnophilia, posted 12-24-2005 4:01 PM Buzsaw has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024