Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Against the LAW?
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 31 of 130 (356070)
10-12-2006 5:04 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by RAZD
10-11-2006 9:40 PM


Re: does she need sympathy?
Maybe it's about time that Homo sapiens started some system for chosing people to shape the world in a positive manner.
I'd agree with that.

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 10-11-2006 9:40 PM RAZD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Damouse, posted 10-12-2006 11:17 PM Silent H has replied

  
Damouse
Member (Idle past 4936 days)
Posts: 215
From: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Joined: 12-18-2005


Message 32 of 130 (356220)
10-12-2006 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Silent H
10-12-2006 5:04 AM


Re: does she need sympathy?
quote:
Maybe it's about time that Homo sapiens started some system for chosing people to shape the world in a positive manner.
I'd agree with that.
Any suggestions?
Thats the problem with a system, someone can always play it. Closest thing to a static uncorruptable government is a monarchy, and then your ruler and their family might spit out some bad ones.

-I believe in God, I just call it Nature
-One man with an imaginary friend is insane. a Million men with an imaginary friend is a religion.
-People must often be reminded that the bible did not arrive as a fax from heaven; it was written by men.
-Religion is the opiate of the masses

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Silent H, posted 10-12-2006 5:04 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Silent H, posted 10-13-2006 4:46 AM Damouse has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 33 of 130 (356244)
10-13-2006 4:46 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Damouse
10-12-2006 11:17 PM


Re: does she need sympathy?
Any suggestions?
Not in this thread. But at this point I guess I'd add a tongue in cheek swimsuit competition, or maybe even fully nude, to whatever system we have.
I generally don't trust anyone who doesn't have a sense of humor and/or cannot accept the reality of the human body.

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Damouse, posted 10-12-2006 11:17 PM Damouse has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 34 of 130 (356360)
10-13-2006 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
10-09-2006 7:13 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
quote:
Certainly since 1948.
Several Mr. Universe Pagents
Er, those are not shown on prime-time network TV, and neither are they really comparable for what they judge, nor for their influence on the culture.
They have never been even remotely as popular as female pageants.
Pageants for girls and women exist for babies and toddlers all the way up to grandmothers past retirement age. Many, many high schools have some kind of beauty pageant for girls.
Where are the bodybuilding competitions for male toddlers?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 10-09-2006 7:13 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 6:56 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 35 of 130 (356361)
10-13-2006 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Damouse
10-10-2006 12:19 AM


Re: Selection Process
quote:
Why is it bad that women compare themselves to find the one that has the most agreed-upon beauty? This is NOT a bad thing,
It is bad because this very narrow beauty ideal is then pushed quite agressively by many societal factors, causing girls to form, pretty much from the cradle, poor physical self-images if they do not live up to this narrow ideal.
This can lead to all sorts of destructive habits, including eating disorders, compulsive exercising, etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Damouse, posted 10-10-2006 12:19 AM Damouse has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 36 of 130 (356362)
10-13-2006 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Silent H
10-10-2006 6:01 AM


Re: Fanfare for the common woman and man
quote:
I understand that you personally might not like it, but why can't it be just a bit of fun?
They could be, and probably are for some.
They were not for me, and they weren't for quite a few other people, since many women protested them in decades past.
My reality was that no comparable contests existed for men. I never saw them on TV, I never heard any males talking about them, I never had any inkling that any male that I knew was ever interested in them at all, or even knew they existed.
As usual, you are trying to oversimplify a complex social issue.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Silent H, posted 10-10-2006 6:01 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Silent H, posted 10-14-2006 6:04 AM nator has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 37 of 130 (356363)
10-13-2006 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by nator
10-13-2006 6:40 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
I'm not sure it goes all the way down to toddlers, but boys are well represented in kiddie contests. But there are Junior Mr. Universe, Junior Mr. America, Junior Mr. Olympia contests.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 6:40 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:25 PM jar has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 38 of 130 (356369)
10-13-2006 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by jar
10-13-2006 6:56 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
quote:
I'm not sure it goes all the way down to toddlers, but boys are well represented in kiddie contests. But there are Junior Mr. Universe, Junior Mr. America, Junior Mr. Olympia contests.
The thing is, though, the counterpoint to female beauty pageants are not body building contests. The point of body building is to build one's body to be as hugely muscular as possible, not about encompasing some kind of overall male ideal, which is what the female pageants say they attempt to do.
The counterpoint to Mr. Olympia is Ms. Olympia, not Miss America.
What is the male counterpoint for Miss America? Where do the boys and men walk and strut in bathing suits, state/country-themed costumes and sexy evening wear? Where do they sing and dance? Where do they have to answer silly questions about world issues and be judged on the poise and articulateness of their response?
Beauty pageants claim to be judging the ideal all-around woman. No such contests exist for men.
Mr. Olympia is NOT about being the ideal male. It's a sport.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 6:56 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 7:31 PM nator has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 39 of 130 (356373)
10-13-2006 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by nator
10-13-2006 7:25 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
The counter part of Miss America is ...
Da-Da
Mr. America.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:25 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:42 PM jar has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 130 (356377)
10-13-2006 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by jar
10-13-2006 7:31 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
Yes.
Has any man you have ever known done anything other than
1) Look at you blankly when you mentioned the Mr. America pageant, or
2) Sniggered at, made fun of, or put down as probably gay any man who would be in such a pageant?
AbE: Mr. America doesn't exist, apparently. I couldn't find a website. There is a competition called Manhunt that chooses the best male model, but that's not exactly the same. Miss. America is not a competition among models.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 7:31 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 7:52 PM nator has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 41 of 130 (356380)
10-13-2006 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by nator
10-13-2006 7:42 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
Well, frankly I cannot remember talking to anyone about any of the silly pageants whether they involved men or women. I have never watch a Miss America or Miss Universe pageant or a Mr. America or Mr. Universe.
It is funny that anyone would even know about any of them.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 7:42 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 8:31 PM jar has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 42 of 130 (356389)
10-13-2006 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by jar
10-13-2006 7:52 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
quote:
Well, frankly I cannot remember talking to anyone about any of the silly pageants whether they involved men or women. I have never watch a Miss America or Miss Universe pageant or a Mr. America or Mr. Universe.
It is funny that anyone would even know about any of them.
The Miss America pageant (and Miss Universe, when I was a kid) is s on prime time network television, and has been since 1954. In the 60's, it was the highest rated program on television.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 7:52 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 8:54 PM nator has replied
 Message 45 by Silent H, posted 10-14-2006 6:18 AM nator has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 43 of 130 (356392)
10-13-2006 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by nator
10-13-2006 8:31 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
The Miss America pageant (and Miss Universe, when I was a kid) is s on prime time network television, and has been since 1954. In the 60's, it was the highest rated program on television.
May well have been. There is no accounting for taste.
And we get the idea Schraf, you have your panties in a wad. Sorry.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 8:31 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 10-14-2006 3:57 PM jar has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 44 of 130 (356446)
10-14-2006 6:04 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by nator
10-13-2006 6:55 PM


Re: Fanfare for the common woman and man
They were not for me, and they weren't for quite a few other people, since many women protested them in decades past.
I get that they weren't fun for you. I'm not arguing that you or anyone else should like them. What I am challenging is your apparent suggestion of what they are and do.
That other women share your feeling is of no importance. Neither is the fact that women have protested. Xians protest tv programs and even science as being antiXian, that does not make it so.
In stark contrast to your experience, many women have enjoyed both participating in and viewing beauty contests. This is across cultures and time.
If people are having fun, and you don't have to watch or participate if you don't, then what's the problem? You may not like that the people who do are in the majority and in some fashion have their opinions effected by such things, but that doesn't argue against their legitimacy.
My reality was that no comparable contests existed for men. I never saw them on TV, I never heard any males talking about them, I never had any inkling that any male that I knew was ever interested in them at all, or even knew they existed.
I believe I have already granted you that males contests are not as popular as female contests. That does not mean they do not exist, that does not mean the "ideals" as you put it do not exist for men or not enforced through other venues, nor anything about the inherent natures of contests involving women or men.
Clearly if you wanted to see contests involving men, you could have. And by the way some guys do talk about contests, and even where they don't talk about Mr Universe in specific generally do discuss looking good in relation to other competitions. Physical shape is certainly an obsession with guys or you wouldn't find steroid use among them.
My guess on why women's contests are more popular is that we are coming out of a time where men would generally feel less comfortable attending such events (homophobia), while women would not feel the same stigma, that women's sexuality was repressed and it was not thought proper (or even desirable by women) to view such events (but hypocritically boys would). Oh yes this is not to mention that men appear to be more visually inclined.
As it is we have already seen shifts in strip shows and sexually graphic material with the loosening of social mores regarding women's sexuality. Those recently male dominated venues are becoming women focused.
Even mainstream "women's" shows like Oprah have pure beefcake segments. I mean its always interesting to see things like segments on firemen from Alaska or something, and they all look so good. Not one fireman from Alaska is a bit tubby or has a big nose, or balding. Wow.
One might also point to the women's novels sections of bookstores. That's been going on forever and it ain't guys in potbellies pushing those books. In fact so called women's movies are usually about love affairs of some kind, and the guys generally look good don't they? Hmmmmm.
As usual, you are trying to oversimplify a complex social issue.
That people are attracted to other humans based on physical esthetics is a simple fact. That people derive pleasure from doing so is simple. That they might construct contests based on that as they do many other facets is also simple.
However, social issues around beauty or contests regarding beauty, may not be simple. I'm willing to look at this in as complex a way as you want. I'm just not going to accept very simple subjective statements (me and my friends don't like them, or I don't see anything similar for men) as evidence for more complex social realities (specifically techniques of oppression).
I'm more than likely going to be gone for the next 3-4 days, and so not able to respond anyway. Why not think about the issue and construct a solid argument for your position, which not only explains why you don't like it, but why others do like it, and why beauty is handled in different ways for men and women?
And I ask you this. Comb through your posts before posting and remove commentary about what I think, or am trying to do, or am doing. Focus on the evidence or arguments I am presenting.
This is usually where our arguments derail, and I am trying to keep things on the tracks.

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 6:55 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by RAZD, posted 10-14-2006 5:00 PM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 45 of 130 (356447)
10-14-2006 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by nator
10-13-2006 8:31 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
The Miss America pageant (and Miss Universe, when I was a kid) is s on prime time network television, and has been since 1954. In the 60's, it was the highest rated program on television.
All that means is it was thought such a show would bring in the most money, or attract the most attention.
Does it really surprise you that in the 50's and 60's where men tended to have the most cash, and their sexuality was not as oppressed as women's, that a show involving a parade of beautiful women (appealing to the most common concepts at that time) would be thought a money-maker? That it would be an attention getter?
And its not like women had no outlets for oggling men. The movies were generally vehicles for dashing men, who could usually get more naked than women on screen. Sports were displays of guys in relatively great shape and undress.
I might add that even if one were to accept for sake of argument that beauty contests during some period of history and culture were used as a mechanism for socialization (in gender role and identification of beauty), that does not mean that is something inherent to beauty contests.
If you don't like what they once were, or what you feel they are today, does not mean they should be chastised in general. Promote the kinds you would like to see. That is one reason I have already mentioned that there are more than just the few you keep bringing up.
Edited by holmes, : clarity

holmes {in temp decloak from lurker mode}
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by nator, posted 10-13-2006 8:31 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by RAZD, posted 10-14-2006 4:50 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024