the rocks speak

Insecure?(..........Someone hurry and get the ego surgeon, we have a critical case in post 15, we need an emergency self aggrandizement bypass stat......)Most of us "evo's" have trawled through page after page of the mindless pap at AIG and co. fact is we have probably seen more attempts to justify YEC than you have, strangely we are still "evo's", why? Because the "evidence" that we are told refutes "evolutionism" is usually uterly uncompelling, ad hoc, downright lies or any mixture of the above....As for silly questions would that be the requests that you (attempt to) back up any assertions that you make, such as the flowers in Australia example above? Hardly a silly question, and as for "losing arguements".....(....Dammit man we need Dr H.Umility down here straight away, we're losing him, if this man doesn't have his ego deflated to normal levels his head will explode....)As for the rest you have the right to an opinion, the rest of us also have the right to correct you when you bollocks something simple up and point out that maybe, just maybe, if you took a few courses, read a few books, whatever, you might be able to form an educated opinion and not need correcting all the time....[This message has been edited by joz, 05-13-2003][This message has been edited by joz, 05-13-2003]

Actually I'm pretty sure that would be organic/inorganic molecules, as in organic are produced by living creatures (although not exclusively, H₂O an CO₂ for example) or contains a carbon backbone...If it really is matter that you mean could you explain the difference between the quarks and leptons that make up an ant and a pebble? Apart from the nmber and ratio that is, what special properties does the matter of the ant posess that the pebble doesn't?See personally I am interested and I'm sure we could observe these new hadrons and leptons say at CERN were you to give us some account of how they differ from the regular garden variety....[This message has been edited by joz, 05-15-2003]