Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   AdminPD RE: warning
pbee
Member (Idle past 6058 days)
Posts: 339
Joined: 06-20-2007


Message 1 of 3 (421559)
09-13-2007 7:27 AM


This is in reference to: http://EvC Forum: ramifications of omnipotence for God -->EvC Forum: ramifications of omnipotence for God
AdminPD, Have you read or looked at the infamous 93 posts?
The original post raised the question on God's power and capacity as a Creator relative to the first human pair. It put into question their capacity and obedience under the terms of God's arrangement(free will). It raised the question, on whether or not God remained almighty(omnipotent) where His creations stumbled so early on in the arrangement.
Now some stated that the first human pair was incapable or discerning a good choice from a bad one based on the premise that they were innocent or free of sin. This reasoning would imply that God was not almighty, and would of been playing games(manipulating) with His human creations. It also implies that God is somehow not in control as He would be exhibiting human characteristics(panicking) in the face of change or actions outside the parameters of His arrangement.
I think the argument rests precisely in line with the topic. In those so called 90+ posts, I submitted hoards of appropriate information and references to support my arguments. So why a call for mediation? Does the board have a policy against a number of posts from a specific reader under one topic? Or are we seeing the results of specific members crying foul behind the scenes?
It is quite common for communities to run on a body of preferred members. If this is the case, tell me now and I will find another forum to carry out my discussion in.
Also, I don't want to sound like I'm being difficult but your warning is circular, asking for an open explanation then stating that any response will result in a 24 hours timeout.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by RAZD, posted 09-13-2007 7:43 AM pbee has not replied
 Message 3 by AdminModulous, posted 09-13-2007 7:43 AM pbee has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024