Randman, I think Briterican has given you some very reasonable responses, such as the portion below the off-topic quote in
message 78:
Briterican writes:
But to stay on the topic of the OP, I once again state my opinion that "theistic evolutionists" are NOT really ID'ers, and undoubtedly do not subscribe to the concepts put forward by ID'ers.
You can argue semantics and say that "if they believe in a God, then they must consider him intelligent, and so it's intelligent design"... but I am using the term "intelligent design" to refer specifically to the works of the likes of Michael Behe. I think it is misleading to use the term Intelligent Design (especially in caps as the OP did) in reference to anything other than the very specific works to which the term has been associated with.
The OP might as well have said "I think that theistic evolutionists believe in God..." well, of course they do, that's why they are theistic. Does that mean they agree with Michael Behe and irreducible complexity? Probably not.
You responded with:
Randman writes:
Uh huh....so a bunch of evos bash creationism and ID? what else is new?
Things seem to have gone downhill from there.
Closing down in 10 minutes.
Adminnemooseus