Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discerning Which Definition to Use
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 97 of 106 (559627)
05-10-2010 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by purpledawn
05-10-2010 6:56 AM


Re: Hyperbole
purpledawn writes:
Now if heavens and earth symbolize (which is not the definition of the word) something else, then please provide outside scholarly support for that symbolism. As I said in Message 51, symbolism and idioms are cultural and unless explained within the writing can't be determined without knowing the cultural basis.
im not really interested in a scholars opinion on this verse...the writer wasnt a scholar so its not as if only a scholar can understand it.
There are instances in the OT where the heavens refers to ruling governmental powers.
One example is in Isaiah 14:9-14 describes the fall of Nebudcadnezza as one who falls from heaven...the place where he ruled.
"all the goatlike leaders of the earth. It has made all the kings of the nations get up from their thrones....
12O how you have fallen from heaven, you shining one, son of the dawn! How you have been cut down to the earth, you who were disabling the nations! 13As for you, you have said in your heart, ‘To the heavens I shall go up. Above the stars of God I shall lift up my throne, and I shall sit down upon the mountain of meeting, in the remotest parts of the north. 14I shall go up above the high places of the clouds; I shall make myself resemble the Most High
In the NT Paul makes a statment about being situated in 'heavenly places'. It wasnt a vision of the future, it wasnt a prophecy...it was simply a statement where he used a figurative use of the word 'heavens' and applied it to those in union with Christ.
Eph 2:6and he raised us up together and seated us together in the heavenly places in union with Christ Jesus,
Paul, and the other christians he was speaking to, were still very much on earth when he said this. They had not ascended into heaven, yet he says that God had seated them in heavenly places. These are both examples of how the 'heavens' are figuratively used for positions of authority. In a worldly sense, its the ruling governments, in the christian context, its the authority to teach the word of God.
So back to 2 Peter3:10....the 'heavens' will be burned up because God will remove the 'governmental aurthorities' and take over the rulership of mankind. He has done so in the past when he has defeated ruling powers such as Egypt and he will do so again in order to bring about a 'new heavens' (rulership) and a 'new earth' (society of people)
Fire is also symbolic of cleansing & refining in the bible.... so its fitting to say that the 'heavens and earth that are now are stored up for fire' because they are going to be 'cleansed' and 'refined'
Malachi speaks of the priesthood (levites) being cleansed by fire at
Malachi 3:1-3 Look! I am sending my messenger, and he must clear up a way before me....
2But who will be putting up with the day of his coming, and who will be the one standing when he appears? For he will be like the fire of a refiner and like the lye of laundrymen. 3And he must sit as a refiner and cleanser of silver and must cleanse the sons of Le′vi
purpledawn writes:
In 2 Peter 3:10 the author writes: The heavens will disappear with a great noise.
So if this is a hyperbole, disappear with a great noise is the exaggeration. So what does that mean? What will the heavens actually do?
because the heavens (like earth) is figurative, and i've shown that it is figurative for governments and authorities, then the noise they make will likely be their opposition to being removed from their posts. The national rulers will not give up without a fight and they will make a big noise doing so. Revelation 16:14 tells us that the kings of the earth are being gathered together to the war of the great day of God the Almighty.
The only way we can understand these figurative uses of such words is to take other bible passages into consideration. To undertsand a verse on its own is not going to get us very far at all. And while agree that in some cases, scholars can help in our understanding, they do not necessarily provide us with an indepth knowledge of Gods word because undertsanding comes from God alone. jesus proved that when he denounced the scholars of his own time for not understanding the basics of the mosaic laws....Jesus understood better then them becuase God gave him understanding....he didnt need to learn from a scholar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by purpledawn, posted 05-10-2010 6:56 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by purpledawn, posted 05-11-2010 4:31 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 99 of 106 (559692)
05-11-2010 5:04 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by purpledawn
05-11-2010 4:31 AM


Re: Hyperbole
purpledawn writes:
I say that the word earth doesn't just symbolize people because of the verses concerning "new earth". As I said before, I don't think he's talking about new people. With this symbolism he would be referring to a new social order or nation.
a new social order or nation is exactly what he's talking about
the people who make up the 'earth' today will also make up that new nation or social order.
Just as the new 'heavens' will be a new authority/rulership for the people who make up that new nation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by purpledawn, posted 05-11-2010 4:31 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by purpledawn, posted 05-11-2010 8:00 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 101 of 106 (559844)
05-11-2010 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by purpledawn
05-11-2010 8:00 AM


Re: Understanding the Difference
purpledawn writes:
Now you're back to fiction. The author of 2 Peter would have been referring to one nation, not many. I didn't find that the symbolism referred to more than one nation. The author would have been referring to one area. If we carry the statement forward, that means anything outside of that original area today is not included.
which nation and which area?
you are reverting back to literal talk again. Christianity was designed for people from ALL nations to come together to worship God. So Peter is NOT speaking about one nation and one area.... he is saying that the current world society, the sociiety of people who were/are divided culturally and religiously, will become one nation under the new heavenly government
christians are not the only ones who will be brought into that new nation....all the nations from all around the world will become one nation. Then all the 'earth' (people) will become one.
Its the theme of the entire bible right from genesis thru the prophets and into the NT...if you dont read it all and take it all into account, you wont understand what is being said....Look:
Gen 22:16-18"And by means of your seed all nations of the earth will certainly bless themselves due to the fact that you have listened to my voice.
Isaiah 65:17For here I am creating new heavens and a new earth; and the former things will not be called to mind, neither will they come up into the heart"
Acts 3:25 "YOU are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant which God covenanted with YOUR forefathers, saying to Abraham, ‘And in your seed all the families of the earth will be blessed.’
Acts 10:34 "At this Peter opened his mouth and said: For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial, 35but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him"
Reve 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the former heaven and the former earth had passed away, and the sea is no more. 2I saw also the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his peoples. And God himself will be with them
The christians didnt teach anything that the OT writers had not already said... they were simply repeating Gods teaching as they found it in the OT and therefore Peter is speaking about these same things.
But you wouldnt know that if you didnt first know that the OT spoke about....the only way to read the NT is to read the OT.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by purpledawn, posted 05-11-2010 8:00 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by purpledawn, posted 05-12-2010 8:10 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 103 of 106 (560226)
05-13-2010 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by purpledawn
05-12-2010 8:10 AM


Re: Understanding the Difference
purpledawn writes:
Don't change the meaning of their symbol. The word earth in apocalyptic language doesn't symbolize people in general, it symbolizes a nation; which is a specific group of people.
right, so God will only be dealing with one specific nation of people. Ok well so much for Jesus direction to spread christianity around the whole earth to people of all nations and so much for Gods promise that people of ALL nations will benefit from Abrahams seed.
You just cant change the theme of the bible to suit your idea of how you want to read the text and what rules of grammar you want to apply.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by purpledawn, posted 05-12-2010 8:10 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by purpledawn, posted 05-14-2010 4:57 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 105 of 106 (560288)
05-14-2010 6:16 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by purpledawn
05-14-2010 4:57 AM


Re: Understanding the Difference
purpledawn writes:
Do you understand the difference between discerning which definition to use of a word with multiple meanings and understanding a symbolic or idiomatic use of the word?
yes i do, but you dont.
the entire bible must be looked at to understand what someone is saying...you cant ignore everyone else in favor of semantics

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by purpledawn, posted 05-14-2010 4:57 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by purpledawn, posted 05-14-2010 7:32 AM Peg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024