What do you mean?
Everybody seems to be saying "Chomski's this", "No he's this" so on an so forth.
My only pet peeve, and yes this is somewhat ironic considering my post, is when people combines anarchy with anything else. Because anarchy means having no government. Not a minimal, not a partial, but
no government. Anarcho Socialist is wrong, anarcho libertarian is wrong, because a libertarian is not against some government, they just want it to a bare minimum. At least to my understanding. And anarcho-Socialism is actually mob rule, in other words a true democracy. At least to my understanding whenever I hear a person describe it. Which is is not the true meaning of anarchy.
Basically, it just smacks of political trickery. If you rename something you control the debate. like how torture becomes "improved interrogation techniques". It's very disingenuous.
We might as well have an anarcho-capitalist, or an anarcho-president.
™ Version 4.2
