|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Right Wing Cartoonist vs Reality | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4220 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
Generalization involves taking limited information and applying it to an entire group. I agree, but the problem is that those who are not on the loony fringe of the left & right, tend to not do much speaking. The moderate left, center and moderate right just don't say much, thus the impression is that the left is communistic, anti religion, anti capitalistic and the right is fascist, fundamentalist and anti socialistic. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4046 Joined: Member Rating: 8.3 |
I agree, but the problem is that those who are not on the loony fringe of the left & right, tend to not do much speaking. The moderate left, center and moderate right just don't say much, thus the impression is that the left is communistic, anti religion, anti capitalistic and the right is fascist, fundamentalist and anti socialistic. Exactly why generalization is dangerous. Even when the so-called "moderates" of whatever "side" are talking, they're certainly less exciting, less frightening, less ridiculous, and overall less notable than the fringe folks. People are far more likely to notice and remember things that have an emotional impact or confirm a pre-existing belief, regardless of that actual comments and positions in real life. A person could say a hundred perfectly normal and ordinary things, express dozens of perfectly acceptable positions...but if that person then says just one comment that we consider strange or objectionable or extreme, like "It's okay to keep the Gitmo detainees imprisoned indefinitely without charge, trial, or even any presented evidence of any crime, because they're terrorists." Internally, we'd all be marking whether this person is now on our "side" or their "side," and every reasonable comment the person has ever made is forgotten. Our impression of that person is now based on our generalization of the "side" we've placed him/her on. and not any of their own statements...and the outrageous statement by the one person is tallied as another drop of evidence supporting our pre-existing generalization for that "side," regardless of actual accuracy. Polarization is literally built-in to the human brain. Continually escalating tribalism is the natural state of affairs; it takes active effort in the form of education (and sometimes the cognitive pressure point of social pressure to combat an unacceptable result, like how racism is now socially unacceptable in the West) or a greater external enemy to bring disparate groups together. Human psychology makes politics (and sales/marketing, and religion...) downright frightening.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3992 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.5
|
bluescat48 writes: The moderate left, center and moderate right just don't say much... Ah, moderates...God bless 'em and preserve the rest of us.
quote: Phil Ochs, Talking Birmingham Jam Dost thou think, because thou art virtuous, there shall be no more cakes and ale? -Shakespeare Real things always push back.-William James
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined:
|
Um... you guys are committing the fallacy of the middle man.
I've already proven that the majority of conservatives are evil. The fact that they put Boehner in congress, someone who has shamelessly passed out bribe checks from the tobacco companies to other congressmen, is proof of this. You guys keep blaming that the majority of conservatives are moderates, and yet voting results continue to prove you wrong. Let's step back to reality, shall we? I know what you guys are saying are more politically correct, but are you willing to sacrifice reality and truth for the sake of political correctness? PS - Don't be surprised if I don't respond to you in days. I've been practically living in my lab. Edited by Taz, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4046 Joined: Member Rating: 8.3 |
Um... you guys are committing the fallacy of the middle man. ..."you guys?" WHo are you lumping me in with? The irony, it burns. For that matter, how have I committed the GOlden Mean fallacy? I haven't commented on which positions are right, I never once said that moderates have the best ideas, or that the correct course of action lies between the "left" and "right." All of my posts have been about the risks of overgeneralization, because an individual can almost never establish an accurate representative of a group sufficient to predict the beliefs of a self-identified member of that group.
I've already proven that the majority of conservatives are evil. The hell you have - and I say that as a pretty hardcore liberal. I think that many of the positions supported by the official Republican Party are at best misguided or ignorant or stupid and at worst totally unethical. Attempting to restrict abortion, to deny gays the right to marry according to their own wishes, to cut social programs that keep Americans alive instead of cutting the gargantuan military budget...I could go on, and I certainly oppose strongly those positions. Some I would even identify as "evil." But we all know that American voters are very, very often single-issue idiots. There are self-identified conservatives who vote Republican solely for gun rights, but oppose their party on gay rights or the treatment of the Gitmo detainees and who hated Bush the Lesser, for example. Just like how I'm a self-identified liberal, I tend to vote Democrat, and yet by and large I really dislike Obama and the party I vote for because they really don't accurately represent my interests and views - they just do better than the Republicans, and there unfortunately aren't any other viable choices. You can't just sweepingly generalize that "American conservatives are evil." They aren't a single unified group.
The fact that they put Boehner in congress, someone who has shamelessly passed out bribe checks from the tobacco companies to other congressmen, is proof of this. Oh come on. American conservatives in general did not put Boehner into the HOuse - the 8th District of Ohio did. Are you now going to lump in self-identified conservatives from everywhere else in the country with that one district in that one state? How do conservatives from other districts, who had no ability to cast a vote on the matter, bear responsibility for Boehner? Not to mention that we all know American politics is very rarely about choosing someone you want to vote for, and more about keeping the worst guy out of office. Taz, you're very clearly just running with your initial hypothesis that "conservatives are evil" and specifically looking for confirmation of your established belief rather than trying to test it. You see Boehner, you see Bush (come on, somebody finish that joke...), and you see confirmation that conservatives are evil. So how can we test your hypothesis, Taz, rather than looking for more confirmations? You're a scientist, you work in a lab, what evidence would potentially falsify (or at least add weight to alternatives) your generalization that "conservatives are evil?"
You guys keep blaming that the majority of conservatives are moderates, and yet voting results continue to prove you wrong. I didn't claim any such thing - and besides that, most Americans don't even vote. In the 2008 election, the highest turnout since the 60s, we had only a 56.8% voter turnout! Midterm elections typically have voter turnouts in the mid-30% range! We know why voters are apathetic - there are very, very rarely any good choices, the average person's view of even the politician they would vote for is often poor, it feels like a chore rather than self-governance... With such a low voter turnout, how can you honestly say that voting results are indicative of the majorty of a subgroup of Americans? Are the self-identified conservatives who don;t vote now just as responsible for electing specific representatives as those who did vote? I can agree that apathy and failing to vote does affect election results, certainly, but you can't hold the guy who didn't vote equally as responsible for electing (Congressional Bastard) as the guy who actually did vote for him, and you certainly can't say that the apathetic non-voter supported (Congressional Bastard)!
Let's step back to reality, shall we? I know what you guys are saying are more politically correct, but are you willing to sacrifice reality and truth for the sake of political correctness? Taz, I see you making sweeping judgments on a very large, varied group of people based on a tiny amount of information. I see you very obviously falling for the traps of confirmation bias. I'm willing to believe that "all conservative Americans are evil" if sufficient evidence is provided, but you've in absolutely no way shifted that probability by using the election of Boehner by a single district in a single state as indicative of all American conservatives, nor have you proven that Boehner is exceptionally evil amongst his peers. He handed out bribes for tobacco companies? Sure, that's bad. But my understanding is that bribery (whether directly or in the form of influential lobbyists "gifts" and such) is rather the normal state of affairs in Washington. Are so-called liberal Congresscritters actually less guilty of the same evil? Did you even check? Or did you just see "oh, there's a Republican who did something evil, that confirms my hypothesis that he's exceptionally evil and therefore supprots my broader hypothesis that all conservatives are evil, never mind if there are liberals that do the same thing, that would significantly lower the weight of the evidence I prefer so I'm not going to bother looking." If your hypothesis is that conservative politicians like Boehner are more corrupt than liberal politicians, you need to check whether conservative corruption significantly deviates from the rate of corruption among all politicians. If it's close, then observing that Boehner is corrupt is rather like observing that he's in Congress. Let's try this: Obama is a self-identified liberal. He's supported a few traditionally liberal goals, like healthcare, even if he did so rather weakly and I think fudged the job. But he's also not a good guy. His administration defended DOMA for years. His adminsitration made only a halfhearted attempt to close Gitmo, and now is proceeding with military show-trials, and still has taken no steps to grant the detainees basic legal rights like habeas corpus or the right to a lawyer in violation of the Constitution and international law. He's worked hard to retain basically all of the power Bush the Lesser grabbed, including the disgusting PATRIOT Act. Does Obama represent you, as an American liberal? He certainly doesn't represent me. And yet I'm almost certain to vote for him again, simply because the alternatives will represent me less. Is President Obama evil? Am I evil for voting for him, even if I don't support many of his policies? Am I significantly different from a self-identified conservative who had similar feelings about Bush?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4220 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
Does Obama represent you, as an American liberal? He certainly doesn't represent me. And yet I'm almost certain to vote for him again, simply because the alternatives will represent me less. Is President Obama evil? Am I evil for voting for him, even if I don't support many of his policies? Am I significantly different from a self-identified conservative who had similar feelings about Bush? I agree for the same reasons. Elections are normally the lessor of 2 evils. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Rahvin writes:
This line of yours says it all. Why should we even care what all those bastards think if they don't vote? Like their opinion really matter in the debate...
and besides that, most Americans don't even vote. Taz, I see you making sweeping judgments on a very large, varied group of people based on a tiny amount of information. I see you very obviously falling for the traps of confirmation bias.
Where did I say ALL this or that? I said voting and polling results have consistently proven that the conservatives (those who vote anyway) are oppose to progress in regard to human rights. Women's rights, black people's rights, hispanics, etc. all have been opposed by the majority of the right. Are you seriously going to deny this?
I'm willing to believe that "all conservative Americans are evil" He handed out bribes for tobacco companies?
Wait, do you doubt this? All you have to do is google. Boehner admitted this.
Does Obama represent you, as an American liberal?
What are you talking about? I never liked Obama.
Are the self-identified conservatives who don;t vote now just as responsible for electing specific representatives as those who did vote?
Yes, they are directly responsible for all the evil their fellow conservatives have done. They could have stopped them but they didn't. Again, why do their opinions matter if they don't say anything? I don't give a fuck if most conservatives support human rights. If they don't vote, then they don't matter.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5952 Joined: Member Rating: 5.7
|
My friend pointed me here tonight: http://thinkprogress.org/ --
quote: OK, Harty is described as being 90 years old:
quote:With all due respect (meant entirely in the Woody-Allen sense), since at that age I would deservedly be challenged as to my ability to continue driving, I should expect one to be challenged as to one's ability to run a state. For one thing, Hitler never ever decided to send anyone to Siberia, no matter how mentally deficient. No, he (or at least his minions) painted up buses or trucks to depict them as going to really fun places. And they loaded them up with mental deficients to go on really fun excursions to really fun places. And they piped the exhaust of the vehicle into the passenger space in order to kill them by carbon-monoxide poisoning. At 90 years old, Harly should know his history (or rather what to us is history, but to him was current events). You don't ship them out, but rather you kill them right here. My brother-in-law is a life-long Republican and a fundamentalist (of the Chuck Smith variety, quite literally) for the past couple decades. He has since retired, about a decade ago. He really surprised me a few years ago when he said, "I've come to realize that the Republicans are not my friends."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined:
|
dwise1 writes:
If you read one of my earlier posts in this thread, I described this man I know who in the course of only a couple years changed from a hard liner right wing advocate to a liberal commie all because he lost his job and developed a spinal degenerative disease. The only thing holding his family up are the very federal programs he condemned just a couple years ago. And the only thing keeping him from becoming outright a cripple is Obama's healthcare reform, something that he very vocally hated with a passion just a couple years ago. He has since retired, about a decade ago. Off the top of my head, I can name half a dozen people who have been affected by the economic hard times we're facing and have converted because they have been left behind and abandoned by the very system they used to advocate. Even my brother has taken a 180 degree turn because the republican candidate he supported promised to halt all construction projects in order to give more tax cuts for the rich in our state. Almost immediately, my brother's company prepared to face possible massive layoffs of its engineers. This is what it takes to make rightwingers see why conservative ideals are evil and unempathetic toward people. All it takes is put these right wingers in a situation where their livelihood could be compromised and see how long they'll keep advocating giving the rich more tax breaks at the cost of the middle and lower income brackets. Bill Maher's this week's show (which I managed to catch a glimpse of when I came home from work late tonight) suggested that we should have a new reality tv where every week we pick up a wall street executive and drop him in a poor neighborhood. I know how these executives will change because I've seen it happened to half a dozen people I know. Almost overnight, my brother, a devout right wing christian conservative, changed his stance because the republican candidate whom he supported was going to make him lose his job in order to give tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires. And over the course of 2 years, my acquaintance changed from a tea party member to an outright liberal because his tea party ideals was going to put him, his wife, and his two young daughters in the street just because he lost his job and he no insurance company would cover him for his condition. Try to be politically correct all you want, moderates. I won't negotiate with evil.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Some things Asay forgot:
http://jackdean.posterous.com/...s-is-what-class-war-looks-l
quote: Enjoy by our ability to understand Rebel American Zen Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Actually, I've been aware of these figures for quite a while. I've pointed them out once and a right winger called it a coincidence. Not being able to counter such claim, I never mentioned it again.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
Some things Asay forgot: Ted Rall has written a similar column entitled "The Phony Budget Crisis" (line here).
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rrhain Member Posts: 6351 From: San Diego, CA, USA Joined: |
RAZD writes:
quote: Incorrect. They claim to be so but every time they get into power, they destroy the budget with irresponsible spending. It's why since the modern economy began after WWII, the economy has always done better under Democrats than under Republicans. If it were not for the interest alone on the Reagan/Bush debt (with a Republican-controlled Senate Finance Committee run by Bob Dole, if you will recall), the budget would have been balanced in 1994. It's why the Great Depression happened. It's why, in 1937 when the Republicans got back into power in the Congress and started complaining about "irresponsible spending," the economy collapsed again. It's why the Reagan/Bush recession was the worst since the Great Depression. It's why the Bush II recession topped that. Clinton cut more public-sector jobs than Reagan created and yet still Clinton's total job-creation numbers trounced Reagan (in fact, all Democratic presidents since WWII have had better job-creation numbers than all Republicans.) Who do you think it was that said, "Deficits don't matter"? It wasn't a Democrat. Rrhain Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time. Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rrhain Member Posts: 6351 From: San Diego, CA, USA Joined: |
Omnivorous writes:
quote: Um, did you completely miss the 2000 election? Where on earth do you think "Gore said he invented the Internet" came from? Why do you think the media has adopted the Fox-style "just asking" nonsense: "Is Obama the Antichrist?" That was the cover of Newsweek. The Tea Party was an astroturf group created by Fox News and was treated as legitimate by the rest of the media with not a single player pointing out the nonsense of "Keep your government hands off my Medicare!" What on earth makes you think they don't "snarl and spit when they say Obama or roll their eyes when they interview Democrats"? Rrhain Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time. Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2136 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Who do you think it was that said, "Deficits don't matter"? It wasn't a Democrat. Does the term "dead on arrival" mean anything to you? How about the agreement Reagan had with the democrats in his first term to raise taxes if they cut spending? And how he allowed taxes to be raised but then the democrats raised spending even more? And then again? Plenty of blame to go around. How about we just blame almost all politicians instead of playing party politics?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024