Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 235 of 1229 (616106)
05-19-2011 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by AZPaul3
05-18-2011 6:14 PM


Re: Time
Hi Paul,
Here is the entire page.
quote:
2.3 Relevant Relativity
Several relativistic effects have already been incorporated into the GPS system so, for the ordinary user of broadcast ephemerides, only two relativistic corrections must be considered. First, the receiver must apply a correction to the transmitted time to account
for relativistic effects arising from orbit eccentricity of the transmitting satellite, This is the At, term defined in the ICD. Second, the finite and universally constant speed c of signals propagating in a vacuum from a transmitter to a receiver, relative to an inertial frame (the geometric path delay), must be accounted for. The receiver must also account for ionosplieric aiid tiqmqAicric: delay corrc‘c tioils, wliicli we do iiot consider here.
Three relativistic effects are gernime to GPS. Rates of clocks in GPS are adjusted (as they are for International Atomic Time) to match the rate that clocks would run on the geoid of the earth. The geoid is a surface of constant, gravitational potential in the rotating frame in which the effects (2) and (3) described below add to a constant value.
The three relativity effects are as follows.
(1) Constancy of the speed of light and relativity of synchronization. GPS time is defined using the principle of the constancy of c to synchronize an imagined system of clocks everywhere in space in the neighborhood of the earth (this is called Einstein syn-
chronization). GPS satellite clocks are in principle adjusted to agree with this imagined system of clocks. This network of synchronized GPS clocks realizes a coordinute time, a system of self-consistent time markers with which to label events. This definition of GPS
time requires a locally inertial coordinate system. GPS time is thus defined relative to an earth-centered inertial coordinate system (an ECIF), but the rate is set to match the rate at which clocks would run on the geoid. An ECIF is also used to simplify the paths of signals propagating from satellites, since, with sufficient accuracy for GPS, light travels in Euclidean straight lilies at the speed c iii vacuuiii relative to such inertial frames [a].
(2) Second-older Doppler shift. A clock moving with respect to an ECIF runs slower relative to coordinate time in that ECIF than if it were at, rest in the ECIF. This is the time dilation effect due to the magnitude of the relative velocity, sometimes called the
second-order Doppler effect. For satellites in GPS orbits, the fractional frequency offset needed to compensate for this is approximately +8.3 x relative to the rate of clocks on the earth’s geoid.
(3) Gravitational frequency shift. A clock at rest in a lower gravitational potential runs slower relative to coordinate time than if it were at rest in a higher potential. This is called the gravitational red shift. Thus, standard clocks closer to the earth run slower than standard clocks farther away, since the gravitational potential becomes more negative closer to the earth. Clocks on GPS satellites run faster than clocks at rest on the earth’s surface. Thus GPS satellite clock frequencies need to be adjusted by a fraction of about -5.3 x lo-’’ relative to the earth’s geoid, to compensate for this effect. To compensate for the relativistic effects described in paragraphs (2) an (3) above for circular orbits, and as a consequence of the requirement that GPS satellite clocks run at the rate’that a standard clock on the geoid would run, atomic clocks in GPS satellites are given a fixed fractional frequency offset of -4.4645 x 10-l’. The user does not have to be concerned about these rate corrections.
Emphasis mine.
So according to that the satellite clocks are adjustable and are adjusted to keep the exact time the clock on earth does.
If that is wrong please explain.
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : correct recipient

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by AZPaul3, posted 05-18-2011 6:14 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by Taq, posted 05-20-2011 3:53 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 237 of 1229 (616110)
05-19-2011 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 230 by fearandloathing
05-18-2011 8:39 PM


Re: Russian GPS/GLONASS
Hi fear,
fearandloathing writes:
I would really like to put this to bed, but I suspect it will be ignored also
From your source.
quote:
SATELLITE CLOCK OFFSETS
GLONASS clock offsets (I) are transmitted as part of each satellite's ephemeris data once every half-hour. The clock information arrives in the form of two parameters (i) the SV clock phase offset from GLONASS system time, @ and (ii) the SV clock fractional frequency offsets from the GLONASS system reference, al. The clock offset az, the second rate of change of phase used in GPS, is not employed by GLONASS as the half-hour update makes this unnecessary. GLONASS does transmit one additional timing parameter - the phase offset between system time and its reference standard, Ao. This last offset is normally only updated once a day. There is again a parallel here between the two satellite navigation systems as GPS also transmits a phase offset between GPS system time and its reference standard, UTC(USN0)
They adjust the offsets every half hour.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by fearandloathing, posted 05-18-2011 8:39 PM fearandloathing has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 238 of 1229 (616111)
05-19-2011 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 236 by Rahvin
05-19-2011 2:56 PM


Re: Time
Hi Rahvin,
Seems like I had Rahvin on the brain.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Rahvin, posted 05-19-2011 2:56 PM Rahvin has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 245 of 1229 (616167)
05-20-2011 2:24 AM
Reply to: Message 240 by AZPaul3
05-19-2011 4:08 PM


Re: Time
Hi Paul,
AZPaul3 writes:
The clock itself is not adjusted. The time output from the clock is adjusted before being placed in the transmitted message. The cesium clock ticks at its natural rate. That rate cannot be adjusted.
Gravity alone will change the frequency. And if I am not mistaken temperature can also change the frequency.
quote:
cesium standard: A primary frequency standard in which electronic transitions between the two hyperfine ground states of cesium-133 atoms is used to control the output frequency. (188) Note : The energy level between the two hyperfine ground states corresponds, in the absence of external influences (e.g. , the magnetic field of the Earth), to a frequency of 9,192,631,770 Hz.
emphasis mine. Source
I would interpert that to say the closer to the earth the slower the frequency. I could be wrong.
I can't make 'source' go to the exact page but if you click on the letter c under the letters, and scroll down to cesium standard and click it you will reach the quote.
AZPaul3 writes:
OK. So if you don't care why the output adjustments need to be made (Time Dilation per GR) for GPS to work then why are you even in this discussion?
What happened to the part where I said "they have to match"?
The GPS satellite clock and the earthbound clock has to match. If they don't the system will not work.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by AZPaul3, posted 05-19-2011 4:08 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by NoNukes, posted 05-20-2011 11:35 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 257 by AZPaul3, posted 05-20-2011 3:03 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 259 by Theodoric, posted 05-20-2011 4:21 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 246 of 1229 (616168)
05-20-2011 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 239 by hooah212002
05-19-2011 3:34 PM


Re: Existence=?????
Hi hooah,
hooah writes:
Sounds like you really do have a priori. Why did you start this thread if you already have the answer? Do you have any experiments to provide the validity of this gentleman's claim of being the existing one?
I just prefer to call that eternal existing one God.
Rather that a higher power.
Or string theory, or instanton, or God particle, or higgs bosom or any of the other names or hypothesis of what caused the universe to begin to exist in the form we see it today.
Just as many as there are for any of these other things I mentioned.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by hooah212002, posted 05-19-2011 3:34 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by hooah212002, posted 05-20-2011 10:52 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 248 of 1229 (616171)
05-20-2011 3:04 AM
Reply to: Message 225 by fearandloathing
05-18-2011 6:06 PM


Re: Time
Hi fear,
fearandloathing writes:
OK chew on this about the ESA's GNSS system and let me know what you think.
You really want to know what I think.
I think they could just make up a time and as long as the clocks in the satellites and the one on earth were in sync the system would work.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by fearandloathing, posted 05-18-2011 6:06 PM fearandloathing has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 249 of 1229 (616209)
05-20-2011 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 247 by Straggler
05-20-2011 3:02 AM


Re: Time
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
If I want to very very precisely measure how long something takes which clock should I use and why?
Either one as long as they have been adjusted to the 9,192,631,770 Hz. frequency.
In fact you could use any of the clocks in the GPS system as they are all adjusted to operate at the 9,192,631,770 Hz frequency.
Time is not affected by the location of the clock, the rate of duration stays the same.
The clock mechanism is affected by the gravity or movement of the clock.
The stronger the gravity the slower the frequency.
The colder the atom the slower the frequency.
The more excited the atom the faster the frequency.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2011 3:02 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by granpa, posted 05-20-2011 10:40 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 252 by crashfrog, posted 05-20-2011 11:04 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 255 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2011 2:15 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 256 of 1229 (616244)
05-20-2011 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by NoNukes
05-20-2011 11:35 AM


Re: Time, Clocks, and GR denial
Hi NoNukes,
Sorry about the neglect.
NoNukes writes:
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cesium.html
quote:
This frequency is electronically divided down and used in a feedback control circuit ("servo-loop") to keep a quartz crystal oscillator locked to a frequency of 5 megahertz (MHz), which is the actual output of the clock, along with a one-pulse-per-second signal. The entire apparatus is shielded from external magnetic fields.
The third paragraph below the one you quoted says:
quote:
In 1967, the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures first defined the International System (SI) unit of time, the second, in terms of atomic time rather than the motion of the Earth. Specifically, a second was defined as the duration of 9,192,631,770 cycles of microwave light absorbed or emitted by the hyperfine transition of cesium-133 atoms in their ground state undisturbed by external fields.
Your source agrees with the source I presented.
They both agree that unaffected by a external magnetic fields such as the gravity of earth the frequency will be 9,192,631,770 Hz.
NoNukes writes:
ICANT writes:
quote:
A primary frequency standard in which electronic transitions between the two hyperfine ground states of cesium-133 atoms is used to control the output frequency. (188) Note : The energy level between the two hyperfine ground states corresponds, in the absence of external influences (e.g. , the magnetic field of the Earth), to a frequency of 9,192,631,770 Hz.
emphasis mine.
I would interpert that to say the closer to the earth the slower the frequency. I could be wrong.
NoNukes writes:
The clocks don't have to match. It is enough that we know the degree of mismatch.
My little Tom Tom is not smart enought to figure out the differences from 4 or 5 different satellites. If it does not get the same time stamp from each GPS clock it will not be able to figure out where it is at on the ground.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by NoNukes, posted 05-20-2011 11:35 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by crashfrog, posted 05-20-2011 4:39 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 261 by NoNukes, posted 05-20-2011 5:36 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 262 by fearandloathing, posted 05-20-2011 5:38 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 269 of 1229 (616609)
05-23-2011 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by NoNukes
05-23-2011 12:10 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
Apparently ICANT does not accept the time dilation predicted by Special Relativity due to relative motion between frames.
ICANT don't believe time can be dilated.
Dilated meaning streached or expanded.
You can not streach time like you can bubble gum.
Time is a concept of man. A concept can not be streached.
An object can be streached or shortned.
What kind of an object is time?
So could you give me a definition of the time that you are streaching when you talk about time dilation?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by NoNukes, posted 05-23-2011 12:10 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by Taq, posted 05-23-2011 3:00 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 271 by NoNukes, posted 05-23-2011 3:34 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 272 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2011 4:20 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 346 by Jaderis, posted 06-02-2011 3:45 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 273 of 1229 (616672)
05-23-2011 9:40 PM
Reply to: Message 270 by Taq
05-23-2011 3:00 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
Then what word should we use for the observed fact that time moves at different rates in different frames of reference?
What makes you think it does?
Taq writes:
So could you give me a definition of the time that you are streaching when you talk about time dilation?
We could use the amount of time it takes for light to travel one meter.
So what do you use to determine the length of that duration?
Taq writes:
The oscillation of cesium has been mentioned before.
Are you saying the frequency of the cesium is time?
Taq writes:
Pretty much any physical interaction that depends on time would be applicable.
But nothing depends on time. Everything depends upon existing. Time is a concept of man that he invented to measure these physical interactions that you are talking about.
Taq writes:
For example, the rate at which iron is oxidized by free oxygen could be used. The rate at which a specific pendulum swings.
But iron oxidizing is not time.
The rate a specific pendulum swings is not time but it is used to measure man's concept of time.
So I ask again. Can you give me a definition of the time that is being streached by dilation?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by Taq, posted 05-23-2011 3:00 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by Taq, posted 05-24-2011 3:49 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 274 of 1229 (616675)
05-23-2011 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 271 by NoNukes
05-23-2011 3:34 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
You believe that gravity slows a cesium atom clock by exact amount to match the time dilation effect predicted by GR.
No.
I believe that the further away from the center of the earth a cesium clock is the faster the frequency will be. That is one of the reasons the clock has to be offset before launch to match the clock on the ground.
There is also an onboard frequency synthesizer built into the clock to tune the frequency of the satellite clock.
NoNukes writes:
But you seem to deny that relative motion has an effect on clocks or time. Is that correct?
I do not deny that motion has an effect on clocks.
Duration which is measured by the concept of time invented by man is more constant than the speed of light.
NoNukes writes:
As best I can tell your position on GR is that gravity produces an effect is on clocks but not time, while your position on SR is complete denial of any effect at all. I think that is a fairly unique combination.
Clocks are affected by the gravity of Earth probably by the gravity of the sun, and by motion.
Duration which is measured by the concept of time invented by man is not affected by anything.
I will get to the muons after further study.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 271 by NoNukes, posted 05-23-2011 3:34 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2011 11:34 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 278 by NoNukes, posted 05-23-2011 11:45 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 275 of 1229 (616677)
05-23-2011 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by crashfrog
05-23-2011 4:20 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi crash,
crashfrog writes:
Believe it or don't, but it happens. It has to happen, because the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers regardless of their velocity.
Can you even define the time that you say streaches?
Is time something physical that can be streached like bubble gum?
If time is not physical how do you streach it?
Question:
Where in the universe is light traveling in a vacuum?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2011 4:20 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2011 11:21 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 279 of 1229 (616693)
05-24-2011 1:21 AM
Reply to: Message 278 by NoNukes
05-23-2011 11:45 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi NoNukes,
Re-read your question.
NoNukes writes:
You believe that gravity slows a cesium atom clock...
I said NO I do not believe that.
I then said as you quoted: I believe that the further away from the center of the earth a cesium clock is the faster the frequency will be.
So no gravity does not make the clock frequency or tick rate be slower. The reduced gravity will make the clock tick faster because of less force exerted upon the atoms.
Now which one of my statements you quoted disagrees with that statement?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 278 by NoNukes, posted 05-23-2011 11:45 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 286 by NoNukes, posted 05-24-2011 10:53 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 292 by Taq, posted 05-24-2011 3:56 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 280 of 1229 (616695)
05-24-2011 1:39 AM
Reply to: Message 276 by crashfrog
05-23-2011 11:21 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi crash,
crashfrog writes:
Can you even define the time that you say streaches?
Time is the reason things don't happen all at once.
That is not a definition of time.
Time is what measures the duration between events or of events themselves.
So give me a definition of time.
You say it streaches so you must know what it is that can be streached.
crashfrog writes:
Where in the universe is light traveling in a vacuum?
Almost everywhere. It's generally only as it passes through transparent materials that the speed of light is measurably different from its speed in a vacuum.
If 70% of the universe is made up of dark energy and 25% is made up of dark matter with the other 5% made up of all the stuff we see how can there be a vaccum?
If the universe is 100% energy and matter there is no vaccum. Light has to travel through those to get to where it is going.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2011 11:21 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by Rahvin, posted 05-24-2011 2:28 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 284 by crashfrog, posted 05-24-2011 10:37 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 293 of 1229 (616856)
05-24-2011 6:32 PM
Reply to: Message 291 by Taq
05-24-2011 3:49 PM


Re: ICANT is not alone
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
Why don't you look up the units for frequency. Last I checked, frequency is measured in Hz which is cycles/second.
Where does the second come from?
Taq writes:
It occurs at a specific rate in a specific environment. Rate is measured in time.
Would it rust out whether the duration of that event is measured or not?
Taq writes:
Time exists whether man is there to measure it or not.
Then you should have no problem in giving a definition for the time that is streached in dilation.
Can you present one?
You guys keep harping about my understanding of time dilation and not one of you have given a definition of what is being dilated.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by Taq, posted 05-24-2011 3:49 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by Taq, posted 05-24-2011 6:45 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 296 by Rahvin, posted 05-24-2011 7:23 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024