Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 938 of 1229 (627807)
08-04-2011 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 936 by NoNukes
08-03-2011 4:34 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
What problem is that?
I seem to get the idea for the driver to fire the laser at the Salt Lake Flats as the car travels over the tracks he would need a hole in the floorboard of the car. Because as stated the driver just pointing a laser pen at the Salt Lake Flats and firing it the pulse would hit the inside bottom of the car and stop.
NoNukes writes:
When the pulse leaves the laser pen it is outside of the car...
Do you believe that this matters? Why would it?
The laser pen mentioned is mounted through the roof of the car and flush with the exterior of the car.
The car is traveling in a vacuum at 0.5 c over the Salt Lake Flats.
That means when the pulse is emitted from the laser pen it is on the exterior of the car and in a vacuum.
There is nothing in that vacuum to alter the direction of motion of the pulse. According to everything I have read that pulse will travel in a straight line in the direction the laser pen was pointed at the moment the pulse was emitted. That pulse will not move the width of a hair in the direction the car is traveling. There is nothing to force the pulse to hit the detector as there is in the modified cycle where the pulse is traveling in a vaccum tube between the mirrors.
Now can you explain how the pulse can not travel at a 180 angle relative to the mounted laser pen?
If you can't then the pulse can not hit the detector as the detector has moved 2 feet relative to the point in the vacuum the pulse was emitted from the laser pen.
NoNukes writes:
Over what distance does this signal travel. If the signal is traveling over a wire, how does it get to a moving vehicle?
The laser pen is mounted on a frame on the car 4 feet above the sensor that is mounted on the track.
A sensor is mounted on the frame that passes over the sensor on the tracks which sends the signal to the laser pen to release the pulse.
The sensor mounted on the frame on the car is conected to the laser pen with a wire so that the signal has to travel exactly 4 feet from the sensor on the tracks to cause the laser pen to emitt a pulse.
NoNukes writes:
I have no idea where you are saying this detector is located. Please clarify what "in the middle them" means. A diagram would be really helpful. Your description isn't very clear.
_________._____,_____._____,_____._____,
         S     D     S     D     S     D

There is 2 feet between the S and the D.
There is 4 feet between the S's and 4 feet between the D's.
S equals sensor and D equals detector.
The sensor on the car passes over the sensor on the tracks the signal goes to the laser pen which emitts a pulse. At the time the pulse is emitted the laser pen is directly over the detector.
My question was, will the pulse hit the detector that is below the laser pen when the pulse is emitted?
Or will the pulse hit the second sensor?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 936 by NoNukes, posted 08-03-2011 4:34 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 939 by NoNukes, posted 08-04-2011 11:46 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 940 by Son, posted 08-04-2011 1:07 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 941 by Taq, posted 08-04-2011 2:26 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 942 of 1229 (627846)
08-04-2011 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 940 by Son
08-04-2011 1:07 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Son,
Son writes:
The problem is that in your scenario, your pulse moves in the direction the salt flat lakes are traveling if it misses the detector.
Well in my scenario the car is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
I did not declare the car frame as stationary.
But if you do declare the car frame as stationary and say the Salt Lake Flats are receeding from the car at 0.5 c the point the pulse is released into the vacuum will also receed from the car at 0.5 c.
So let me modify my scenario and ask you a question.
_________._____,_____._____,_____._____,
         S     D     S     D     S     D

              Son

There is 2 feet between the S and the D.
There is 4 feet between the S's and 4 feet between the D's.
There is 25 feet between Son and the first detector.
S equals sensor and D equals detector.
The sensor on the car passes over the sensor on the tracks the signal goes to the laser pen which emitts a pulse. At the time the pulse is emitted the laser pen is directly over the detector.
My question was, will the pulse hit the detector that is below the laser pen when the pulse is emitted?
Or will the pulse hit the second sensor?
My question for you is what will Son observe?
Will Son observe the detector to flash a light?
Or will Son observe the pulse to hit the second sensor instead?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 940 by Son, posted 08-04-2011 1:07 PM Son has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 943 by Taq, posted 08-04-2011 2:36 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 944 by Son, posted 08-04-2011 3:00 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 945 by NoNukes, posted 08-04-2011 5:24 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 946 of 1229 (627861)
08-04-2011 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 945 by NoNukes
08-04-2011 5:24 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
Your own preferred answer to this problem appears to require that the laser beam make a substantial change in direction from its path within the laser pen to the path after the laser beam leaves the pen. I'd sure like to know how and why that happens.
I am not the one that is changing the direction of the pulse after it leaves the laser pen.
I am insisting that the pulse travel in a straight line in a vacuum at 180 relative to the position the laser pen was in when the pulse was emitted from the laser diode.
You on the other hand require the pulse to turn at a 63.43 angle relative to the position the laser pen was in when the pulse was emitted from the laser diode.
If I an outdoors and point my laser pen at the moon and press the button on my laser pen and let it go, how or what can effect where that pulse will go?
Will it go in a straight line until it scatters?
Or will it go at an angle to the position the laser pen is in when the pulse is released until it scatters.?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 945 by NoNukes, posted 08-04-2011 5:24 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 947 by NoNukes, posted 08-04-2011 9:10 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 948 by Taq, posted 08-04-2011 9:35 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 949 by NoNukes, posted 08-04-2011 11:05 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 950 of 1229 (627895)
08-05-2011 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 943 by Taq
08-04-2011 2:36 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
Where is the pen laser in relation to the spot on the tracks where the light strikes at the moment it does strike? That is a much better question.
The same place it is if you had answered my question.
|           |           | these represents the pen
               E     P     E     P     E     P
               |           |           |
               |           |           | these represents the pulse
               |           |           |
               |           |           |
_________._____,_____._____,_____._____,_____,
         S     D     S     D     S     D     S

S = sensor
D = detector
E = pulse emitted
P = pen when pulse strikes the detector
Since the pen is pointed at the D when the pulse is emitted and the pulse will travel in a straight line in a vacuum at c independent of the motion of the emitter the pulse will hit the detector and the light will flash.
At the same time the sensor attached to the frame on the car will pass over the sensor on the track and send the signal to the laser pen which will emitt a pulse directly above the second detector that will strike the detector when the laser pen reaches the position directly above the third sensor etc.
Now for the pulse to hit the sensor which is directly under the P when the pulse hits the detector rather than the detector as you claim it would do the pulse would have to leave the laser pen at a 63.43 angle relative to the position the laser pen is in when the pulse is emitted.
But what does the position the laser pen being in when the pulse strikes the detecetor have to do with where the pulse strikes?
Taq writes:
Why? What is so special about the salt flats that they can remotely grab light and stop it?
There is nothing special about the Salt Lake Flats.
They do not grab the pulse and stop it.
The pulse just continues on it's journey at 180 relative to the position of the pen when emitted from the pen. So if the Salt Lake Flats is all of a sudden receeding from the car so would the pulse be receeding from the car, as the car is traveling at 0.5 c horozontally relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
The pulse is traveling zero horozontally to the Salt Lake Flats. It is also traveling c towards the Salt Lake Flats relative to the point it was emitted from the laser pen.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 943 by Taq, posted 08-04-2011 2:36 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 951 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 5:01 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 953 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 10:48 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 954 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 11:28 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 957 of 1229 (627932)
08-05-2011 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 951 by NoNukes
08-05-2011 5:01 AM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
If the salt flats were to suddenly recede away from the car,
Well actually the only place the Salt Lake Flats would be receeding from, is the car frame you declared as the stationary frame that is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
When you declare the car's frame of reference as stationary the car does not stop traveling 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
It can only be said that the Salt Lake Flats is receeding from the reference frame of the car due to the fact the car is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
The earth does not stop its rotation.
The earth does not reverse its rotation and begin to rotate backwards at 0.5 c.
The car is still moving relative to the Salt Lake Flats at 0.5 c.
The car is still moving relative to the pulse that was emitted from the laser pen at 0.5 c.
The pulse is still moving relative to the point it was released at c.
NoNukes writes:
It's one thing to insist that the direction of the light beam is independent of the source, something which is not correct, but it is a completely different idea to suggest that the light beam must maintain a fix relationship to the salt flats regardless of how the salt flats moves. ICANT, even you ought to be able to see the problem with your statement above.
The Salt Lake Flats do not change their movement they are attached to the earth and move with the earth relative to the core of the earth.
NoNukes writes:
It's pretty easy for any of us to find support for the speed of light in a vacuum being c as measured in any reference frame.
Relative to what?
NoNukes writes:
Here's something to think about. Referring again to your original car and sensor experiment, surely it is possible to aim the light pen at some angle so that it would strike the sensor.
The laser pen would have to be installed through the roof of the car at a 26.57 angle relative to the motion of the car.
NoNukes writes:
What angle would that light beam take from the point of view of an observer sitting on the roof of the car?
An observer on the roof would observe the pulse to travel at 180 relative to the point the pulse was emitted.
NoNukes writes:
How do you reconcile that with the fact that a vertical beam (as determined by a salt flat's bound observer) would miss the sensor?
Both observers would observe the pulse to travel at 180 relative to the point the pulse was emitted, and miss the detector.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 951 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 5:01 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 958 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 1:25 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 961 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 1:50 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 962 of 1229 (627946)
08-05-2011 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 953 by NoNukes
08-05-2011 10:48 AM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
It is certainly possible for a photon to be emitted from the laser pen in such a way that it takes the paths shown in your drawing. So let's just accept the drawing you provided as the reality at least for the purpose of this post.
If the laser pen is installed at a 90 angle relative to the travel of the car on the tracks will the pulse hit the detector as drawn in Message 950?
NoNukes writes:
Let's chose the car sensor as the origin (0, 0 coordinates) of the car reference frame. Of course any arbitrary point fixed to the the car can serve the origin point. Initially the car sensor is directly below the point at which the photon was emitted. The coordinates of the photon at the time of emission are 4 feet high, and zero feet horizontally away from the car sensor which is our origin point. So x,y coordinates are (0, +4 feet).
But at the time that the photon reaches point D, according to your diagram the car sensor is now at the second point S and the light beam is two feet behind the origin of the car reference frame (the sensor) at the first D a height of zero. Surely you would agree with this description. So relative to the car sensor the pulse is now two feet behind the car sensor at height zero. Second x, y coordinates (-2 feet, 0 feet).
Lets see if I understand what you are trying to say.
y = pen
x = sensor
| = direction pen pointed when pulse emitted.
> = direction of car traveling at 0.5 c.
                |          |         |          |
                y          y         y          y

                                     >>>>>

     x          x          x          x          x
     S          D          S          D          S  
The signal is sent when the sensor passes over the first S.
This signal causes the laser pen to release a pulse at the first y.
At this point the sensor mounted on the car just above the tracks is over the first D.
y
.
.
.
.
.
x     x  
Are you saying because the sensor mounted on the car and has moved 2 feet from the first x to the second x the pulse can not travel at a 180 relative to the position the laser pen was in when the pulse was emitted?
You do realize the laser pen is directly over the second x when the sensor gets there as they are attached to the same frame.
Is Newton's first law which is
quote:
Newton's First Law states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force.
incorporated and operational in postulate #1 of SR?
If so what external force do you apply to cause the pulse to travel at an angle?
NoNukes writes:
But more to the point when you say that the path is vertical, without stating in which reference frame you mean, your problem specification is ambiguous. You might well mean that the photon travels vertically in the car reference frame. In fact the latter assumption makes the most logical sense given that the light pen is mounted to the car. Most of us would reach the opposite conclusion if the laser pen were mounted to the ground. In that case I probably would draw something quite similar to your drawing.
What difference does it make whether the laser pen is mounted on the frame added to the car or mounted on the ground and trigered by a sensor on the car.
The pulse when emitted from the laser pen will travel in a vacuum in a straight line in which the laser pen is pointed at the moment the pulse was emitted.
That means the location the sensor on the car is after it has moved 2 feet will have no effect on the pulse that was emitted from the laser pen directly above the detector on the track. The pulse will hit the detector and cause the light to flash.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 953 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 10:48 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 963 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 3:33 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 964 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2011 3:38 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 967 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 4:17 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 965 of 1229 (627951)
08-05-2011 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 961 by NoNukes
08-05-2011 1:50 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
Are you suggesting that it is impossible to direct a beam to hit the sensor using a laser pen mounted on the roof of the car? That we cannot somehow weld the pen to the roof and pick some angle, possibly 26.57 from vertical, for which the photon will strike the sensor. Sorry dude, but I think we both know that there is no need to fire the beam from inside the car. That's just a stalling tactic to avoid the shoe drop that's coming.
Do you ever read anything posted?
Are do you just put your fingers in motion and allow them to type anything without first putting your brain into gear?
The experiment is set up with the car traveling over the Salt Lake Flats at 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
There is a pole mounted on top of the car at a 90 angle relative to the travel of the car. On top of that pole is exactly 4 feet from the exterior surface of the roof of the car. The detector extends 9 inches towards the rear of the car.
The laser pen is mounted through the roof of the car flush with exterior of the roof at a 90 angle relative to the travel of the car.
The laser pen is not mounted at an angle other than 90 relative to the travel of the car.
Now according to Newton the pulse will travel in a vacuum in a straight line at a constant c unless an external force is applied.
This law of Newton is a part of postulate #1.
Taq writes:
Consider this. If the light pen is mounted at the base of the pole, the only straight line paths to the sensor in the car frame of reference are lines essentially parallel to the four foot pole.
Yes.
Taq writes:
If the photon travels in a straight line and if it hits the sensor from the point on the car I've described, the photon must travel along such a path in the car frame of reference. Period.
Yes the pulse will travel in a straight line relative to the pole.
The problem is the pole is moving as it is attached to the car that is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the emitted pulse.
Taq writes:
There are no other straight line paths between the base of the pole and the sensor.
So the pulse will travel in a straight line path from the point it was emitted which will be 2 feet from the pole when the pulse reaches the 4 foot height the detector is from the roof of the car.
Therefore the pulse will miss the detector.
Taq writes:
But if the photon pulse is moving parallel to the vertical pole, what angle does that constitute, as measured in the reference frame of the car?
But the pulse is not traveling parallel to the vertical pole, because the pole is moving at 0.5 c horozontal relative to the vertical motion of the pulse.
Taq writes:
Okay, make a hole in the roof at the base of the pole if you need to. It won't change anything.
The laser pen has been mounted through and flush with the exterior of the roof of the car since Message 827.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 961 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 1:50 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 966 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-05-2011 4:00 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 968 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 4:18 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 969 by crashfrog, posted 08-05-2011 4:23 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 973 by NoNukes, posted 08-05-2011 5:53 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 970 of 1229 (627957)
08-05-2011 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 963 by Taq
08-05-2011 3:33 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
That is when the pulse is emitted. That pulse still has to travel the distance between the pen laser and the tracks.
Yes.
Taq writes:
By the time the light pulse travels that distance the pen laser will be directly over the second S, will it not?
Yes.
Taq writes:
If the pulse is travelling in a straight line from the pen laser in the car's frame of reference then the light pulse will strike the second S.
The pulse does not travel in a straight line from the laser pen.
So no the pulse will not strike the second S.
The pulse is not traveling verticle relative to the position of the pen.
The pulse is traveling verticle relative to the position the pulse was emitted at Y.
At the moment the pulse is emitted from the laser pen at Y which is mounted at a 90 angle to the motion of the car the pulse is in a vacuum with nothing to exert force on it to change it's direction.
Since it was emitted at the point it was directly over the detector aimed at the detector the pulse will hit the detector and cause the light to flash.
For the pulse to somehow change its direction and hit the S as you claim there would have to be external force placed upon the pulse to change it's straight line journey to the detector.
What do you propose to exert that force.
In the modified light clock on my cycle where the pulse is in a vacuum tube the tube exerts external force on the pulse as it travels between the mirrors and forces the pulse in the direction the cycle is traveling.
But in the open vacuum there is nothing to force the pulse to not travel at 180 relative to the laser pen which is mounted at a 90 angle to the travel of the car.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 963 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 3:33 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 971 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 5:03 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 981 by NoNukes, posted 08-06-2011 9:01 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 972 of 1229 (627962)
08-05-2011 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 969 by crashfrog
08-05-2011 4:23 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi crash,
crashfrog writes:
No, this is incorrect. The pole is not moving at all in the reference frame of the car. Thus, in the reference frame of the car the pulse will strike the detector.
How do you place the pulse in the frame of the car?
The pulse has it's own coordinate system. It has distance from the laser diode and distance from the pole and distance from the detector.
So the car is traveling relative to that coordinate system at 0.5 c.
crashfrog writes:
No, this is incorrect. If the pulse were traveling at .5 c relative to the car or the car .5 c relative to the pulse, then an observer in the car would observe that the speed of light was .5 c.
The pulse is traveling at c in a straight line relative to the position of the laser pen at the point the laser pen was activated and the pulse was emitted, which is at a 90 angle relative to the motion of the car.
So the statement the car is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the point the pulse was emitted at is true. And if you want to say the point the pulse was emitted at is traveling at 0.5 c relative to the car that is also true. Maybe I did not make that clear. If you disagree explain why.
crashfrog writes:
But we know what speed of light the observer in the car has to observe: c. Therefore we know that the pulse is moving at c relative to the car.
To be correct you would have to say the observer will observe the pulse moving at c at a 90 angle relative to the motion of the car.
crashfrog writes:
So the pulse will travel in a straight line path from the point it was emitted which will be 2 feet from the pole when the pulse reaches the 4 foot height the detector is from the roof of the car.
Completely wrong. The pulse's path of travel in the reference frame of both the car and both the salt flats is straight, and it intersects with the detector in both reference frames
I was talking about the car with the laser pen mounted on a frame on the rear and you are talking about the one with the laser pen in the roof with the pole on top. So I will make you a diagram.
D = detector
P = pulse emitted
| = direction pen pointed when pulse emitted.
> = direction of car traveling at 0.5 c.

     D          D          D

                  ^ 4 feet
                     direction of car travel  >>>>>

     ^          ^ direction pulse emitted
     P  > 2'    P
     |          | 
The laser pen is located below the P in the position it is in when the pulse is released.
So the pulse is released from the pen at the first P in the direction the pen is pointed.
You say the pulse will travel in a straight line but will hit the second detector rather that the one directly above the point the pulse is emitted.
What causes the pulse to change it's straight line direction so it hits the second detector instead of the one directly above the point the pulse is emitted?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 969 by crashfrog, posted 08-05-2011 4:23 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 974 by crashfrog, posted 08-05-2011 5:54 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 975 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 6:12 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 984 of 1229 (628054)
08-06-2011 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 981 by NoNukes
08-06-2011 9:01 AM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
ICANT writes:
But in the open vacuum there is nothing to force the pulse to not travel at 180 relative to the laser pen which is mounted at a 90 angle to the travel of the car.
Exactly so. There is no force available. And it turns out that no force is needed.
No force needed to do what?
In the following diagram for the pulse emitted from the pen above the second y when trigered by the signal from the first S to hit the second S the direction of the travel of the pulse has to be altered.
y = pen
x = sensor
| = direction pen pointed when pulse emitted.
> = direction of car traveling at 0.5 c.
     |          |          |         |          |
     y          y          y         y          y
                |                      \
                |                        \
                |                        >>\>>>
                |                            \
     x          x          x          x        \ x
     S          D          S          D          S

                           N
                        NoNukes 
You are standing on the Salt Lake Flats 100 feet from the track the car is traveling on.
Will you see the pulse travel as depicted from the second y to the first D?
This pulse travels at a 180 angle relative to the position of the laser pen when the pulse is emitted.
Or will you see the pulse travel as depicted from the fourth y to the third S?
This pulse travels at a 26.57 angle relative to the position of the laser pen when the pulse is emitted.
NoNukes writes:
When a photon (or any object) moves vertically at finite speed as measured in one inertial frame of reference, we can always find some other inertial reference frame in which that same motion is neither vertical nor horizontal. Always.
I would agree that you could put a dot in the center of a piece of paper and draw a six inch line through the dot with 3 inches on each side of the dot and have the direction a photon or any other object could move in a straight line.
You could then draw a line at any degree around a 360 degree circle intersecting the dot and still have a straight line for the photon to travel.
So when you say a photon moves vertically at finite speed, what is the photon traveling vertical relative too?
In the experiment we have been talking about it is specified that the pulse is emitted traveling at a 90 angle relative to the travel motion of the car on the tracks on the Salt Lake Flats.
So it would not make any difference where the earth was in it's rotation cycle the pulse would be emitted traveling at a 90 angle relative to the travel motion of the car on the tracks on the Salt Lake Flats.
Now where could you place an observer where said observer could see the pulse emitted that said observer would not see the pulse emitted at a 90 angle relative to the travel motion of the car on the tracks on the Salt Lake Flats.
NoNukes writes:
the light beam does actually travel along the same direction that the light pen points,
Where have I discussed a light beam in these experiments?
A pulse of laser light from my laser pen occurs when I press and release the button on the side of the pen.
I can not change the trajectory of this pulse of light.
A beam of laser light from my laser pen occurs when I press and hold the button on the side of the pen.
I can change the trajectory of the beam of light simply by changing the direction the laser pen is pointed or the position of the laser pen.
Are you sure you are not getting the two confused?
NoNukes writes:
but that parameter is also different in different inertial reference frames.
So where would you place an inertial reference frame that the pulse could be observed from by an observer when emitted from the laser pen that the pulse would not leave the laser pen at a 90 angle relative to the travel motion of the car on the tracks on the Salt Lake Flats?
Playing around with my Chief Architect professional 3D architectural program I can find no place in a 3D picture I can place a 90 angle and turn and twist it that it ceases to be a 90 angle.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 981 by NoNukes, posted 08-06-2011 9:01 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 985 by Taq, posted 08-06-2011 1:49 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 992 by NoNukes, posted 08-06-2011 3:57 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 995 by crashfrog, posted 08-06-2011 4:39 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 997 by NoNukes, posted 08-06-2011 8:35 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 986 of 1229 (628066)
08-06-2011 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 971 by Taq
08-05-2011 5:03 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
The pulse does not travel in a straight line from the laser pen.
Why not?
You did not use enough of the quote to ask a question.
This is what brought about my comment you quoted.
In Message 970 I said:
quote:
Taq writes:
If the pulse is travelling in a straight line from the pen laser in the car's frame of reference then the light pulse will strike the second S.
The pulse does not travel in a straight line from the laser pen.
So no the pulse will not strike the second S.
The pulse is not traveling verticle relative to the position of the pen.
The pulse is traveling verticle relative to the position the pulse was emitted at Y.
You were saying the pulse had traveled at an angle to reach the second S when the pulse was emitted 2 feet to the left of that point.
So you saying it was a straight line it was not correct as it would have to be at a 26.57 angle relative to the position of the laser pen when the pulse is emitted to strike the second S.
Taq writes:
The pulse is not traveling verticle relative to the position of the pen.
Why not? The pen laser is pointed straight down. Why doesn't the light pulse travel straight down?
The light pulse does travel straight down from the point the pulse is emitted.
It does not travel straight down from the point the laser pen is above the second S. That would require instant travel.
Taq writes:
In the car's frame of reference, the car is not moving. Please adjust your math accordingly. The tracks, sensors, and detectors are moving in the car's frame of reference.
In any reference frame that the pulse can be observed when emitted from the laser pen the car will be moving at 0.5 c relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
Taq writes:
It was emitted at a target moving 0.5 c relative to the motionless car. Are you saying that there is some sort of aether that causes the light to be drug along by the moving sensors and detectors?
No aether is required.
At the moment the pulse is created and emitted from the laser pen it is observed in the frame the tracks, sensors and detectors are motionless in and the car is traveling at 0.5 c relative too.
The pulse is traveling at c relative to the point it was emitted toward the detector the laser pen was pointed at when the pulse was emitted.
The point the pulse was emitted at and the detector are motionless in their frame.
Taq writes:
That is the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard. Tubes do not exert force on photons.
OK remove the vacuum tube from between the mirrors and the pulse will miss the top mirror.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 971 by Taq, posted 08-05-2011 5:03 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 988 by Taq, posted 08-06-2011 3:24 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 990 by Son, posted 08-06-2011 3:40 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 987 of 1229 (628071)
08-06-2011 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 985 by Taq
08-06-2011 1:49 PM


Re: ICANT on inertial reference frames
Hi Taq,
Taq writes:
Why does it have to be altered? The pen laser is directly above the second S when the light pulse strikes it.
Because the point the pulse is emitted is 2 feet to the left of where you say the pulse hits the second S.
You would have to draw a straight line from the point emitted to the second S which would be at a 26.57 angle relative to the position of the laser pen when the pulse is emitted.
Taq writes:
In the driver's frame of reference the pen laser is not moving.
OK.
But when the pulse is created and emitted from the laser pen pointed at the detector the detector and the point the pulse was emitted is at rest in their frame.
Therefore the pulse will travel in a straight line and hit the detector causing the light to flash.
What you are failing to get is that the pulse when emitted is no longer in the laser pen and therefore no longer in the drivers frame of reference.
Taq writes:
If you can, please draw a diagram for the driver's frame of reference. Hopefully this will allow you to understand the differences between the frames of reference.
From a seated position in the car there is no way the driver could observe the pulse being emitted from the laser pen which is mounted on the rear of the car pointed downard at a 90 angle to the motion of the car relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
So no I can't draw a diagram for the driver's observations.
Taq writes:
That's just it, you have to define what vertical is and in relation to what, or else it doesn't make sense.
But I have stated constantly that the pulse travels verticle at a 90 angle relative to the travel of the car relative to the Salt Lake Flats.
So there should be no question of what I am talking about the pulse traveling relative too.
Taq writes:
Think of two guys throwing a ball back and forth to one another. Have them run sideways at the same speed and keep the same distance between them. IOW, have them run parallel paths. From the perspective of the guys throwing the ball they are throwing at a 90 degree angle with respect to the motion of the ground below them. From the perspective of someone in a hot air balloon above them the ball is being thrown at a less than 90 degree angle with respect to the guys motion with respect to the ground. This is exactly what is going on in our light experiments.
B1----------B2
     B1----------B2
     B1----------B2
     B1----------B2   
The boys are parallel and we will ignore the drop the ball will make between them.
The ground is under both of their feet so the ball is travelling parallel to the ground as it travels back and forth between the boys.
There is no place the ball is traveling at a 90 angle with respect to the motion of the ground below them.
Now if one of them were to start dribbling the ball the ball would be traveling at or near a 90 angle to the motion of the ground below them.
Taq writes:
From the perspective of someone in a hot air balloon above them the ball is being thrown at a less than 90 degree angle with respect to the guys motion with respect to the ground.
From a hot air balloon the observer would have a hard time telling whether the boys were rolling the ball on the ground or tossing it between themselves.
That observer would not see anything other than the ball traveling parallel to the motion of the earth.
Taq writes:
This is exactly what is going on in our light experiments.
Guess again.
A 90 angle looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|_______
90 angle

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 985 by Taq, posted 08-06-2011 1:49 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 989 by Taq, posted 08-06-2011 3:36 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 991 by Son, posted 08-06-2011 3:42 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 998 by NoNukes, posted 08-07-2011 1:31 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 999 by NoNukes, posted 08-08-2011 12:20 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 1000 of 1229 (628714)
08-12-2011 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 999 by NoNukes
08-08-2011 12:20 AM


Re: NoNukes on Inertial Reference Frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
Exercise for the intuitive student: Where would the location of sensor S be on the above diagram.
When the laser pen reaches the horizontal point that the sensor sends the signal to the laser pen to cause it to emit the second pulse the laser pen is directly over the S sensor.
The question is what did the first photon that was emitted from the laser pen strike.
If the laser pulse was 1 attometer long when it is emitted from the laser pen, where would it strike?
Would it strike the D or the S?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 999 by NoNukes, posted 08-08-2011 12:20 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1001 by Taq, posted 08-12-2011 11:41 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1002 by NoNukes, posted 08-12-2011 11:48 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 1007 of 1229 (628748)
08-12-2011 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1002 by NoNukes
08-12-2011 11:48 AM


Re: NoNukes on Inertial Reference Frames
Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
I've already answered your question about where the photon would strike. Ignoring SR effects, the photon would strike S under my understanding of the problem,
For the pulse to strike S the laser pen would have to be mounted at a
26.57 angle to the travel of the car, as you would have to draw a straight line from the point emitted to the S.
y = pen
x = sensor
| = direction pen pointed when pulse emitted.
> = direction of car traveling at 0.5 c.
     |          |          |         |          |
     y          y          y         y          y
                |                      \
                |                        \
                |                        >>\>>>
                |                            \
     x          x          x          x        \ x
     S          D          S          D          S

                           N
                        NoNukes 
So for NoNukes to see the pulse hit the second S directly in from of him the pen at the second y would have to be mounted at a 26.57 angle to the travel of the car as the line from the fourth y to the third S shows.
But the laser pen is mounted at a 90 angle to the travel of the car.
Therefore for the 1 attometer long pulse to strike the S it could not travel in a straight line from the laser pen and strike the S.
If the 1 attometer long pulse travels in a straight line from the point emitted where the laser pen is pointed directly at the D detector the pulse will strike the D.
So does the pulse travel in a straight line in the direction the laser pen is pointed when the pulse is emitted?
Or does the pulse acquire a 26.57 angle after emitted and travel in a straight line from that point to strike the S?
I am trying to understand how the statement that the light will travel in a straight line independent of the motion of the emitter, can allow the pulse to travel at a 26.57 angle relative to the direction the pulse was traveling when emitted from the laser pen which is mounted at a 90 angle to the travel of the car.
All the math in the world will not explain that.
y
|\
| \
|  \
|   \
|    \
D     S  
You claim the pulse will not hit the D but will hit the S instead so please explain how the pulse changes directions, when it is emitted pointed at D.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1002 by NoNukes, posted 08-12-2011 11:48 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1008 by NoNukes, posted 08-12-2011 2:49 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 1009 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-12-2011 2:51 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 1010 by Taq, posted 08-12-2011 2:52 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 1013 by Son, posted 08-13-2011 5:13 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 1011 of 1229 (628768)
08-12-2011 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1009 by New Cat's Eye
08-12-2011 2:51 PM


Re: NoNukes on Inertial Reference Frames
Hi CS,
Catholic Scientist writes:
The reference frame is moving.
Which reference frame is that?
The drivers reference frame inside the car?
The cars reference frame on the Salt Lake Flats?
The Salt Lake Flats reference frame?
The pulse's reference frame after it is emitted in the vaccum?
Or NoNukes reference frame in my diagram?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1009 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-12-2011 2:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1012 by NoNukes, posted 08-12-2011 7:46 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 1014 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-13-2011 11:26 AM ICANT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024