The Awesome Obama Thread II

Are you certain that they said it was comical?

So, because Iraq refused to give permission to allow US troops to abuse and kill it's citizens, Obama sent the US troops to Afganistan.
Does this mean that Afgahnistan has given permission for its civilians to be abused and murdered? Well, it was good enough for George Bush.

I definitely have a problem with your timeline: it makes no sense - oh, unless your 2 statements were completely unconnected.

quote:

---

Obama wanted to keep american forces in Iraq beyond the new year. But the Iraqis wouldn't allow Obama's demand for immunity for american soldiers to carry out atrocities against women and children like the above.

---

Which would make that just a baseless assertion with only the most trivial of connections to the Afghan atrocity. Damn those powerful Iraqis!
They can make the US bend to their every whim!Look: I can sense you flailing madly, but you are failing to hit anything.
It seems that you wanted to shout about Obama but instead found a single soldier committing murder.Maybe you could start by showing how Obama bears any responsibility for that crime?Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

And the person that quote mines my replies will misrepresent my position. So, now you claim the opposite?
If you could just keep your claims even slightly consistent, then maybe you wouldn't look like such a conspiracy nut. Again, you are clearly reaching for some kind of meaning - but you have pulled up short.
You have somehow mixed up your claim about Iraq with how the victims of a soldier murderer in Afghanistan feels. Correct.
You have not evidenced anything else.Maybe you could start by showing how Obama bears any responsibility for that crime?Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.